Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#530 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
6.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-39% greener
B
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
501 HYUNDAI PLATINUM
IMO 9637155
5,000 TEU 2013
6.1
B
502 SEASPAN AMAZON
IMO 9630391
10,100 TEU 2014
6.1
B
503 APL SALALAH
IMO 9462029
10,800 TEU 2012
6.1
B
505 TUCAPEL
IMO 9569970
8,000 TEU 2012
6.1
B
504 MSC LAUREN
IMO 9467407
12,400 TEU 2011
6.1
B
506 MAERSK CALABAR
IMO 9525302
4,500 TEU 2011
6.2
B
508 CSCL SATURN
IMO 9467299
13,300 TEU 2011
6.2
B
507 APL BARCELONA
IMO 9462043
10,800 TEU 2012
6.2
B
509 APL COLUMBUS
IMO 9597525
9,200 TEU 2014
6.2
B
510 MSC EUGENIA
IMO 9785469
11,500 TEU 2022
6.2
B
512 POTOMAC EXPRESS
IMO 9349526
6,435 TEU 2008
6.2
B
511 MSC RENEE
IMO 9465306
13,100 TEU 2012
6.2
B
513 CMA CGM PEGASUS
IMO 9399210
11,400 TEU 2010
6.2
B
514 MSC RACHELE
IMO 9290282
7,747 TEU 2005
6.2
B
515 NORTHERN JAVELIN
IMO 9465095
8,400 TEU 2009
6.2
B
516 CMA CGM FORT JAMES
IMO 9966764
7,600 TEU 2024
6.2
B
517 CMA CGM NILE
IMO 9732589
9,443 TEU 2015
6.2
B
518 MAYA BAY
IMO 9983401
2,954 TEU 2023
6.2
B
519 MSC REGULUS
IMO 9465291
13,100 TEU 2012
6.2
B
521 CSCL MERCURY
IMO 9467275
13,300 TEU 2011
6.2
B
520 MSC VEGA
IMO 9465265
13,100 TEU 2012
6.2
B
522 MSC BRANKA
IMO 9720495
9,400 TEU 2016
6.3
B
523 MSC DUBAI VII
IMO 9444285
6,310 TEU 2007
6.3
B
524 CSCL STAR
IMO 9466867
13,300 TEU 2011
6.3
B
525 BUDAPEST EXPRESS
IMO 9450430
8,600 TEU 2010
6.3
B
526 MH PERSEUS
IMO 9967433
7,000 TEU 2021
6.3
B
529 MSC SOFIA PAZ
IMO 9695028
9,000 TEU 2014
6.3
B
528 MSC SAVONA
IMO 9460356
14,000 TEU 2010
6.3
B
527 COPIAPO
IMO 9687526
9,326 TEU 2014
6.3
B
531 ONE REASSURANCE
IMO 9952696
7,000 TEU 2023
6.3
B
530 MSC MARIA SAVERIA
IMO 9467421
12,400 TEU 2011
6.3
B
532 MSC ALIYA
IMO 9842097
15,000 TEU 2019
6.3
B
533 MSC JUDITH
IMO 9299549
8,034 TEU 2006
6.3
B
534 MAERSK GUAYAQUIL
IMO 9727871
10,100 TEU 2015
6.3
B
536 CMA CGM GEMINI
IMO 9410791
11,400 TEU 2011
6.3
B
535 MAERSK CONGO
IMO 9525340
4,500 TEU 2008
6.3
B
539 CMA CGM MUSSET
IMO 9406611
6,570 TEU 2010
6.3
B
538 VALENCE
IMO 9628180
8,800 TEU 2013
6.3
B
537 MSC TORONTO
IMO 9299525
8,034 TEU 2006
6.3
B
542 CMA CGM KHAO SOK
IMO 9925837
5,940 TEU 2023
6.3
B
543 MSC DAMLA
IMO 9250983
4,924 TEU 2002
6.3
B
541 MSC EMANUELA
IMO 9399052
10,000 TEU 2010
6.3
B
544 TEMPANOS
IMO 9447897
8,000 TEU 2011
6.3
B
540 ZIM MOONSTONE
IMO 9968073
7,000 TEU 2024
6.3
B
545 ONE ORPHEUS
IMO 9313008
9,040 TEU 2008
6.3
B
547 MSC ASYA
IMO 9339296
9,200 TEU 2008
6.4
B
546 CMA CGM BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
IMO 9706891
17,859 TEU 2015
6.4
B
550 SPEED
IMO 9475698
13,100 TEU 2012
6.4
B
549 MSC PARIS
IMO 9301483
8,204 TEU 2006
6.4
B
548 MSC NITYA B
IMO 9778117
11,000 TEU 2017
6.4
B
Page 11 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.