Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#74 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-50% greener
A

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
52 CREOLE SUN
IMO 9850214
49,760 2019
4.5
A
51 TORM DANICA
IMO 9702194
50,000 2013
4.5
A
53 DINO
IMO 9995454
50,479 2025
4.5
A
54 MONA
IMO 9917880
55,202 2022
4.5
A
55 ST. PETRI
IMO 9788497
50,105 2019
4.5
A
56 KK MARLIN
IMO 9835939
77,452 2021
4.6
A
58 JEFFREYS BAY
IMO 1013937
49,999 2025
4.6
A
60 MARIA
IMO 9917828
55,202 2022
4.6
A
57 TORM BELIS
IMO 9661247
49,995 2012
4.6
A
59 STENA PROMISE
IMO 9923748
49,990 2022
4.6
A
63 TORM SPLENDID
IMO 9854791
49,932 2020
4.6
A
62 ATHENS C
IMO 1019761
50,170 2025
4.6
A
61 TORM STRENGTH
IMO 9836036
49,999 2019
4.6
A
64 TORM INNOVATION
IMO 9602722
73,847 2013
4.6
A
65 CAPTAIN LEON
IMO 9831206
49,999 2018
4.6
A
66 NORD MINAMI
IMO 9883041
52,825 2020
4.6
A
67 TORM DIWATA
IMO 9683350
49,680 2014
4.7
A
68 TORM SUCCESS
IMO 9836048
49,976 2019
4.7
A
70 ARDMORE DAUNTLESS
IMO 9707388
37,764 2015
4.7
A
69 PS NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9919577
52,853 2022
4.7
A
71 MANCHAC SUN
IMO 9724013
49,994 2016
4.7
A
72 STAMATIA
IMO 9864332
49,999 2018
4.7
A
73 CHIOS STAR
IMO 9827566
50,506 2018
4.7
A
75 TORM DENISE
IMO 9702211
49,999 2013
4.7
A
74 SILVER ELEANOR
IMO 9692301
49,746 2015
4.7
A
76 SOLAR TINE
IMO 9898527
49,343 2021
4.7
A
78 FARIDA
IMO 9845099
55,604 2020
4.7
A
77 GOLDEN SUN
IMO 1018860
49,988 2024
4.7
A
79 TABLE BAY
IMO 9974979
49,999 2024
4.7
A
80 YASA SEAGULL
IMO 9619543
49,990 2017
4.8
A
81 PACIFIC AQUAMARINE
IMO 9994515
49,819 2022
4.8
A
82 CAPE TEMPEST
IMO 9407263
73,720 2005
4.8
A
84 BOXER
IMO 9814193
49,852 2019
4.8
A
83 ATLANTIC MARBLE
IMO 9798959
49,999 2018
4.8
A
85 CELSIUS PORTSMOUTH
IMO 9884837
50,299 2015
4.8
A
86 SEAEXPLORER
IMO 1014022
50,498 2023
4.8
A
87 SAVONETTA SUN
IMO 9911549
49,999 2022
4.8
A
89 ARDMORE SEAFOX
IMO 9708215
49,999 2015
4.8
A
88 LARGO CALIFORNIA
IMO 9843780
50,290 2019
4.8
A
90 DORIC COURAGE
IMO 9847451
49,910 2019
4.8
A
91 PRECIOUS BALBOA
IMO 9997244
49,948 2025
4.8
A
92 MARATHO
IMO 9979448
49,999 2025
4.9
A
93 SEAWAYS CREST
IMO 9387920
51,510 2006
4.9
A
95 FPMC 34
IMO 9845166
49,781 2019
4.9
A
94 TAKAROA SUN
IMO 9850202
49,849 2019
4.9
A
96 JAL DHVANI
IMO 1021180
50,667 2025
4.9
A
98 ELANDRA REDWOOD
IMO 9834337
49,999 2018
4.9
A
97 RENAD
IMO 9917816
55,202 2022
4.9
A
99 TORM SOLUTION
IMO 9836050
49,999 2019
4.9
A
100 SM OSPREY
IMO 9786231
50,034 2017
4.9
A
Page 2 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.