Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#529 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-30% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
503 PELOPIDAS
IMO 9501071
176,006 2011
3.2
A
502 CL YICHUN
IMO 9938793
82,304 2023
3.2
A
501 MEDI ARGENTARIO
IMO 9771298
89,499 2015
3.2
A
500 CASTILLO DE NAVIA
IMO 9722974
119,612 2015
3.2
A
498 PISTI
IMO 9893503
81,737 2021
3.2
A
507 NBA MAGRITTE
IMO 9512331
82,099 2013
3.2
A
497 PATRICIA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9464584
114,753 2010
3.2
A
496 MAROUDIO
IMO 9815965
64,723 2022
3.2
A
495 ROYAL KALEIDO
IMO 9851505
80,871 2019
3.2
A
510 LEM MARIGOLD
IMO 9845805
64,663 2015
3.2
A
513 SAKIZAYA POWER
IMO 9783136
81,938 2015
3.3
A
512 SSI DISCOVERY
IMO 9969144
63,712 2023
3.3
A
511 MAXWELL
IMO 9782027
82,170 2017
3.3
A
516 SYLVANER
IMO 9947275
82,412 2023
3.3
A
515 AGIOS NIKOLAS
IMO 9702728
57,902 2014
3.3
A
514 FLAG MARINA
IMO 9384928
106,349 2010
3.3
A
519 YI PENG5
IMO 9221190
76,099 2001
3.3
A
518 GIA INSPIRATION
IMO 9948413
85,035 2022
3.3
A
520 GOLDEN STAR
IMO 9950703
85,000 2021
3.3
A
517 NORDIC OSHIMA
IMO 9687227
76,180 2014
3.3
A
528 ROLAND OLDENDORFF
IMO 9463633
121,448 2011
3.3
A
521 PETIT LANCY
IMO 9999814
82,585 2025
3.3
A
527 TM LUSTROUS
IMO 9897925
82,558 2021
3.3
A
526 ORCHID ISLAND
IMO 9987251
81,996 2024
3.3
A
525 EVRYDIKI
IMO 9448023
114,168 2010
3.3
A
524 TRANS ASIA
IMO 9935454
82,278 2022
3.3
A
523 GIA GLORY
IMO 9877913
84,998 2022
3.3
A
522 YM SPLENDOUR
IMO 9959424
82,715 2024
3.3
A
530 BTG LOGAN
IMO 9952517
82,155 2024
3.3
A
531 AQUAVITA WEALTH
IMO 9985784
64,700 2024
3.3
A
529 HSL TAMPA
IMO 9781035
81,818 2015
3.3
A
532 ALKIMOS HERACLES
IMO 9668881
81,922 2014
3.3
A
542 CL YANGJIANG
IMO 9977373
64,771 2024
3.3
A
541 PACIFIC APEX
IMO 9916226
63,620 2021
3.3
A
540 SYNTHESEA
IMO 9697959
78,020 2015
3.3
A
539 INDUS VICTORY
IMO 9563940
92,870 2006
3.3
A
538 ANGLO CYNOSURE
IMO 9599133
98,697 2012
3.3
A
537 STAR KAMILA
IMO 9285043
82,769 2005
3.3
A
536 MEDI SYDNEY
IMO 9755816
81,661 2015
3.3
A
535 SDM SHENYANG
IMO 9949261
64,318 2023
3.3
A
534 DIAMOND GLOBE
IMO 9828857
82,027 2018
3.3
A
543 STAR SAPPHIRE
IMO 9860037
82,000 2019
3.3
A
533 TRUSTN TRADER
IMO 9937555
82,245 2023
3.3
A
550 BASIC PASSION
IMO 1083425
82,073 2024
3.3
A
549 VIBEKE IRIS
IMO 9744996
81,886 2016
3.3
A
548 MYRTO C
IMO 9752383
81,011 2017
3.3
A
547 WEALTH CERES
IMO 9469053
87,328 2010
3.3
A
546 OCEAN TIME
IMO 9848522
82,024 2019
3.3
A
545 STAR SIRIUS
IMO 9520883
98,681 2011
3.3
A
544 SAKIZAYA DIAMOND
IMO 9697868
81,938 2013
3.3
A
Page 11 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.