Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#69 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-61% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
48 FRONT EARL
IMO 9788320
303,121 2015
1.9
A
51 KASSAB
IMO 9783710
298,721 2018
1.9
A
54 NISSOS DESPOTIKO
IMO 9845697
318,744 2019
1.9
A
53 NEW AMBITION
IMO 9900667
307,620 2021
1.9
A
55 MARAN ATALANTA
IMO 9810393
319,398 2018
1.9
A
56 FRONT MORGAN
IMO 9877781
299,999 2021
1.9
A
57 GEM NO. 1
IMO 9735361
302,652 2013
1.9
A
58 NEW RENOWN
IMO 9759604
318,926 2017
1.9
A
60 DEGAS
IMO 9926673
299,829 2022
1.9
A
59 KHK EMPRESS
IMO 9830965
314,014 2017
1.9
A
61 DIAS I
IMO 9858474
299,999 2020
1.9
A
62 FRONT BEAVER
IMO 9943748
300,008 2023
2.0
A
63 MARAN LEO
IMO 9602473
319,450 2010
2.0
A
64 MARAN ARTEMIS
IMO 9753002
319,398 2016
2.0
A
65 ZOURVA
IMO 9679593
319,000 2010
2.0
A
68 SPHERICAL
IMO 9890977
313,166 2018
2.0
A
67 EAGLE VALENCE
IMO 9910234
289,999 2022
2.0
A
66 NISSOS KEA
IMO 9920758
300,323 2022
2.0
A
69 NEW VOYAGE
IMO 9686364
313,733 2015
2.0
A
70 FPMC C NOBLE
IMO 9419955
297,258 2012
2.0
A
72 SOPHIA
IMO 9776559
319,398 2017
2.0
A
71 MARAN ARES
IMO 9796872
319,398 2017
2.0
A
73 FRONT GAULA
IMO 9933652
299,982 2022
2.0
A
74 SHADEN
IMO 9779848
298,750 2017
2.0
A
75 ALMI HYDRA
IMO 9583720
319,357 2013
2.0
A
76 CARIBBEAN GLORY
IMO 9788875
301,528 2017
2.0
A
77 AROSA
IMO 9784386
299,323 2017
2.0
A
81 FRONT VEFSNA
IMO 9730098
297,638 2017
2.0
A
80 RED NOVA
IMO 9602643
319,778 2013
2.0
A
79 NEW DREAM
IMO 9689976
318,292 2014
2.0
A
78 NISSOS NIKOURIA
IMO 9920760
300,323 2022
2.0
A
82 SEA MAJESTY
IMO 9783344
308,206 2017
2.1
A
83 NISSOS DONOUSSA
IMO 9853840
318,744 2019
2.1
A
84 FARHAH
IMO 9484742
319,329 2010
2.1
A
85 AQUILA
IMO 9521473
319,329 2008
2.1
A
86 GULF LOYALTY
IMO 9441245
316,373 2011
2.1
A
87 NEW MERIT
IMO 9706396
318,348 2017
2.1
A
88 SIREN
IMO 9405423
158,583 2009
2.1
A
89 COSWISH LAKE
IMO 9804277
318,737 2018
2.1
A
90 ARAGONA
IMO 9513115
319,319 2012
2.1
A
92 HELIOS
IMO 9941673
302,093 2017
2.1
A
91 MARAN ARETE
IMO 9776547
319,398 2015
2.1
A
94 SAN JACINTO
IMO 9730373
158,734 2014
2.1
A
93 VL PIONEER
IMO 9683661
319,300 2014
2.1
A
95 BREST
IMO 9941867
157,071 2023
2.2
A
96 EAGLE VENICE
IMO 9728710
298,991 2016
2.2
A
98 SUR
IMO 9870824
299,997 2020
2.2
A
97 HORTEN
IMO 9740342
297,638 2014
2.2
A
100 NAVE ALLEGRO
IMO 9876414
313,433 2020
2.2
A
99 NEW CONSTANT
IMO 9708514
318,862 2016
2.2
A
Page 2 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.