Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#476 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
6.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-42% greener
B
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
451 OOCL FRANCE
IMO 9622617
13,200 TEU 2011
5.9
B
453 MSC BEIJING
IMO 9289099
8,034 TEU 2005
5.9
B
452 CMA CGM JULES VERNE
IMO 9454450
16,022 TEU 2013
5.9
B
457 MSC GIULIA
IMO 9770737
9,400 TEU 2017
5.9
B
456 TOLEDO TRIUMPH
IMO 9737486
13,870 TEU 2017
5.9
B
458 CAP SAN ARTEMISSIO
IMO 9633939
9,600 TEU 2014
5.9
B
455 CMA CGM ZHENG HE
IMO 9706906
17,859 TEU 2015
5.9
B
454 LUDWIGSHAFEN EXPRESS
IMO 9613018
13,000 TEU 2014
5.9
B
459 MSC ARIANE
IMO 9484443
13,050 TEU 2012
5.9
B
460 CAP SAN LAZARO
IMO 9717216
10,600 TEU 2015
5.9
B
461 MSC ALTAIR
IMO 9465277
13,100 TEU 2012
5.9
B
462 MSC CAROLE
IMO 9785445
12,200 TEU 2021
5.9
B
463 CSCL PACIFIC OCEAN
IMO 9695133
19,000 TEU 2014
5.9
B
466 COSCO ENGLAND
IMO 9516428
13,360 TEU 2008
5.9
B
465 NYK VEGA
IMO 9312781
9,012 TEU 2006
5.9
B
464 COSCO DENMARK
IMO 9516478
13,360 TEU 2014
5.9
B
467 MSC DANIELA
IMO 9399002
10,000 TEU 2008
6.0
B
468 MSC SIYA B
IMO 9793947
11,800 TEU 2018
6.0
B
469 MSC RAPALLO
IMO 9484455
13,050 TEU 2011
6.0
B
471 MSC BERYL
IMO 9467392
12,400 TEU 2010
6.0
B
470 CAP SAN JUAN
IMO 9717204
10,600 TEU 2015
6.0
B
472 ELEONORA MAERSK
IMO 9321500
11,000 TEU 2004
6.0
B
475 CCNI ANGOL
IMO 9683867
9,000 TEU 2015
6.0
B
474 MSC BENEDETTA XIII
IMO 9465253
13,100 TEU 2011
6.0
B
473 TOLTEN
IMO 9612870
8,000 TEU 2012
6.0
B
476 MSC CLORINDA
IMO 9484429
14,000 TEU 2012
6.0
B
477 MAERSK CUNENE
IMO 9561485
4,496 TEU 2011
6.0
B
478 NAGOYA EXPRESS
IMO 9450428
8,600 TEU 2010
6.0
B
480 HAIPHONG EXPRESS
IMO 9778129
10,100 TEU 2018
6.0
B
479 LAEM CHABANG EXPRESS
IMO 9768007
10,100 TEU 2018
6.0
B
481 EVER TOP
IMO 9665619
13,800 TEU 2014
6.0
B
483 HYUNDAI FAITH
IMO 9347554
8,600 TEU 2008
6.0
B
482 EVER FAME
IMO 9850800
11,000 TEU 2021
6.0
B
485 MSC MADELEINE
IMO 9305702
9,100 TEU 2006
6.0
B
484 CMA CGM VOLGA
IMO 9705081
10,622 TEU 2015
6.0
B
486 MSC ADONIS
IMO 9706310
9,288 TEU 2015
6.0
B
489 ULSAN EXPRESS
IMO 9613020
13,000 TEU 2014
6.0
B
488 MSC CRISTINA
IMO 9465241
13,100 TEU 2011
6.0
B
487 CAPE AKRITAS
IMO 9706190
11,000 TEU 2016
6.0
B
490 MAERSK FLORENCE
IMO 9969053
76,513 2021
6.1
B
491 MSC MAGNUM VII
IMO 9252541
6,750 TEU 2003
6.1
B
492 KLEVEN
IMO 9085546
6,418 TEU 1996
6.1
B
500 ONE RESILIENCE
IMO 9952751
7,000 TEU 2024
6.1
B
499 ONE READINESS
IMO 9952684
7,000 TEU 2023
6.1
B
498 ZIM JADE
IMO 9968059
7,000 TEU 2024
6.1
B
497 CAP SAN SOUNIO
IMO 9633953
9,600 TEU 2014
6.1
B
496 EMMA MAERSK
IMO 9321483
11,000 TEU 2004
6.1
B
495 TENO
IMO 9447859
8,000 TEU 2011
6.1
B
494 MUNDRA EXPRESS
IMO 9408865
9,954 TEU 2011
6.1
B
493 CAP SAN MALEAS
IMO 9633941
9,600 TEU 2014
6.1
B
Page 10 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.