Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#18 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-56% greener
A

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1 SEA WOLF I
IMO 9540807
49,936 2011
3.5
A
2 DELOS C
IMO 1058341
49,996 2025
3.7
A
3 MANDALA
IMO 9299135
65,125 2006
3.8
A
4 MH IBUKI
IMO 9994711
49,948 2025
3.9
A
5 LAGERI
IMO 1021934
50,609 2023
3.9
A
6 HAFNIA GUANGZHOU
IMO 9856622
74,999 2019
3.9
A
7 SILVER MOON
IMO 1018872
49,986 2025
4.0
A
8 VICTORIA BAY
IMO 9974981
49,999 2024
4.0
A
9 BANTRY BAY
IMO 9967249
49,999 2023
4.1
A
10 MOSSEL BAY
IMO 9970375
49,999 2022
4.1
A
12 ELAIA
IMO 9798363
49,996 2019
4.1
A
13 MUSTANG
IMO 9995442
50,539 2025
4.1
A
11 KALK BAY
IMO 9970363
49,999 2022
4.1
A
14 JAL PRERANA
IMO 1013987
50,640 2025
4.1
A
15 TORM INTEGRITY
IMO 9602710
73,811 2013
4.2
A
16 ISLA DE BIOKO
IMO 9767235
51,609 2016
4.2
A
17 DEE4 NERIUM
IMO 9929821
49,990 2022
4.2
A
18 ATLANTIC SUNSHINE
IMO 9993810
49,954 2022
4.2
A
19 TORM DORIS
IMO 9683398
49,680 2015
4.2
A
22 TORM SUBLIME
IMO 9854789
49,974 2019
4.2
A
21 TORM DAGMAR
IMO 9702209
49,999 2013
4.2
A
20 TORM DURGA
IMO 9682382
49,680 2014
4.2
A
23 TORM DAPHNE
IMO 9692313
49,746 2013
4.2
A
24 DEE4 KASTANIA
IMO 9933638
49,999 2020
4.2
A
25 ARDMORE PURSUIT
IMO 9732931
50,000 2013
4.2
A
26 MUGELLO
IMO 1030040
74,976 2025
4.2
A
27 STI GALLANTRY
IMO 9712876
109,999 2016
4.2
A
28 TORM DIANA
IMO 9702223
49,999 2013
4.3
A
29 MH NORIKURA
IMO 9994694
49,999 2025
4.3
A
30 PS IMABARI
IMO 9908504
52,838 2022
4.3
A
32 STENA PRO MARINE
IMO 9899739
49,990 2022
4.3
A
31 DEE4 JUNIPER
IMO 9930923
49,999 2020
4.3
A
33 TORM SOVEREIGN
IMO 9797723
49,999 2015
4.3
A
34 PHILOXENIA
IMO 9857250
49,999 2019
4.3
A
35 DEE4 ILEX
IMO 9922093
49,999 2020
4.3
A
37 TORM DAMINI
IMO 9682370
49,746 2012
4.3
A
36 AMIRA
IMO 9917842
55,202 2022
4.3
A
38 PALAWAN STAR
IMO 9401233
73,796 2008
4.4
A
39 SEYMOUR SUN
IMO 9911501
49,999 2022
4.4
A
40 TORM BIRGITTE
IMO 9664720
49,995 2012
4.4
A
41 SEAMERIT
IMO 1014034
50,498 2023
4.4
A
42 STENA PROSPEROUS
IMO 9923750
49,990 2022
4.4
A
45 IONIAN STAR
IMO 9828895
50,506 2019
4.4
A
44 AGISILAOS
IMO 9953418
50,113 2023
4.4
A
43 TORM DULCE
IMO 9682394
49,746 2012
4.4
A
46 AGIOS NIKOLAOS
IMO 9820283
49,988 2018
4.4
A
47 TORM DEBORAH
IMO 9683386
49,680 2015
4.4
A
48 AGIOI FANENDES
IMO 9798375
49,996 2019
4.5
A
50 MINDORO STAR
IMO 9441207
73,677 2009
4.5
A
49 EUROSAILOR
IMO 9895915
49,999 2021
4.5
A
Page 1 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.