Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#135 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-46% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 632 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

121
Q4
138
'27 Q1
84
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
137
'27 Q4
132
'28 Q1
97
'28 Q2
111
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,728 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,512 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,124
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,918–11,738M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,124 of 1,124 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
100 MARAN HOPE
IMO 9729178
179,445 2015
2.5
A
102 KSL SEATTLE
IMO 9683245
181,015 2012
2.5
A
103 SHANDONG DE TAI
IMO 9872121
180,702 2021
2.5
A
104 BULK TIRRENO
IMO 9624263
181,366 2013
2.5
A
105 EREIKOUSSA
IMO 9591739
178,896 2012
2.5
A
108 MILLICENT
IMO 9522714
180,223 2011
2.5
A
107 SEAFIGHTER
IMO 9686326
181,068 2015
2.5
A
106 MINERAL HONSHU
IMO 9614892
181,408 2012
2.5
A
109 CAPE PEREGRINE
IMO 9500754
180,643 2012
2.5
A
110 DUCHESS LILY
IMO 9996977
82,720 2024
2.5
A
111 NAVIOS KOYO
IMO 9598127
181,415 2011
2.5
A
112 GH KAHLO
IMO 9617521
179,816 2014
2.5
A
115 FRONTIER JACARANDA
IMO 9552393
182,757 2011
2.5
A
114 HERO
IMO 9446867
178,076 2010
2.5
A
113 SSI BRILLIANT
IMO 9567099
175,428 2012
2.5
A
117 NSU NEWSTAR
IMO 9668348
181,380 2014
2.5
A
116 CAPE HARMONY
IMO 9514212
178,373 2012
2.5
A
118 OU MAY
IMO 9751016
180,003 2014
2.5
A
119 SHANDONG DREAM
IMO 9907952
207,997 2021
2.6
A
120 TRUE CONRAD
IMO 9778430
207,609 2017
2.6
A
121 PIGASSOS
IMO 9423073
176,364 2011
2.6
A
123 WANG MAY
IMO 9837327
180,682 2019
2.6
A
122 SHANDONG DE RUI
IMO 9872042
180,613 2020
2.6
A
127 AM PORT CARTIER
IMO 9546801
180,715 2013
2.6
A
126 BERGE HOVERLA
IMO 9497359
175,918 2010
2.6
A
125 HANNA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9731614
208,941 2017
2.6
A
124 STAR MARTHA
IMO 9564097
180,274 2010
2.6
A
129 STAR VESTA
IMO 9446506
180,136 2010
2.6
A
128 CAPE IRIS
IMO 9563689
181,403 2012
2.6
A
132 SAKIZAYA TREASURE
IMO 9861328
82,500 2020
2.6
A
131 ZAMPA BLUE
IMO 9454163
178,459 2011
2.6
A
130 WAH SHAN
IMO 9693551
179,546 2015
2.6
A
134 MILLIE
IMO 9492103
180,311 2009
2.6
A
133 DUKESHIP
IMO 9402304
181,453 2010
2.6
A
138 NAVIOS ALTAMIRA
IMO 9589827
179,164 2006
2.6
A
137 EHIME QUEEN
IMO 9767522
181,221 2016
2.6
A
139 SEATTLE SLEW
IMO 9573737
181,447 2010
2.6
A
136 KSL SAPPORO
IMO 9683257
180,960 2012
2.6
A
135 KSL SYDNEY
IMO 9683269
181,009 2012
2.6
A
141 EMERALD SHENGSI
IMO 9981300
85,594 2024
2.6
A
140 BERGE TORRE
IMO 9453731
175,935 2011
2.6
A
142 MOANA INFINITY
IMO 9261932
88,233 2002
2.6
A
145 SAKIZAYA UNICORN
IMO 9892676
82,527 2021
2.6
A
146 FRONTIER HARVEST
IMO 9487976
179,293 2011
2.6
A
144 GCL KRISHNA
IMO 9939931
120,326 2021
2.6
A
143 KSL SAKURA
IMO 9719941
181,062 2013
2.6
A
150 AQUABEAUTY
IMO 9881378
82,023 2020
2.6
A
149 FRONTIER BONANZA
IMO 9511947
179,435 2010
2.6
A
148 MARAN HORIZON
IMO 9702699
180,940 2016
2.6
A
147 ANNABEL L
IMO 9853711
180,803 2019
2.6
A
Page 3 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.