Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#766 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-27% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
751 HAIGUI
IMO 9505821
114,900 2013
3.8
C
753 SERTANEJO SPIRIT
IMO 9637715
154,233 2013
3.8
C
752 VST AMARA
IMO 9742211
109,990 2017
3.8
C
755 NAVIG8 PROMISE
IMO 9791298
109,992 2015
3.8
C
754 STI CONNAUGHT
IMO 9697600
109,999 2013
3.8
C
756 ARCHANGEL
IMO 9302592
163,216 2006
3.8
C
757 STI OXFORD
IMO 9697595
109,999 2015
3.8
C
758 PACIFIC RAWAN
IMO 9772022
109,999 2017
3.8
C
765 SEA SAPPHIRE
IMO 9935600
156,669 2022
3.8
C
764 ALFA ALANDIA
IMO 9752797
106,324 2016
3.8
C
763 ELANDRA BAY
IMO 9821691
115,674 2018
3.8
C
762 PIS RINJANI
IMO 9792864
109,900 2019
3.8
C
761 KWK EXCELSUS
IMO 9728411
114,716 2013
3.8
C
760 KMARIN RELIANCE
IMO 9683025
109,466 2016
3.8
C
759 STI LAVENDER
IMO 9838254
109,999 2017
3.8
C
766 ALFA BALTICA
IMO 9696773
106,373 2015
3.8
C
767 NISSOS CHRISTIANA
IMO 9694658
114,264 2015
3.8
C
768 SWORD
IMO 9783631
104,027 2018
3.8
C
770 SELIGER
IMO 9402263
115,126 2009
3.8
C
769 AMADES
IMO 9903126
112,708 2022
3.8
C
771 VELOS AMBER
IMO 9571038
74,902 2010
3.8
C
773 MINERVA DOXA
IMO 9304617
159,438 2003
3.8
C
772 SAMOS
IMO 9772345
156,978 2014
3.8
C
775 JAG LAXMI
IMO 9568196
105,525 2012
3.8
C
774 ATLANTIC JADE
IMO 9892987
109,325 2019
3.8
C
777 STI SPIGA
IMO 9708148
109,999 2015
3.8
C
776 PIS KERINCI
IMO 9838242
109,994 2017
3.8
C
778 CIELO DI HOUSTON
IMO 9791860
74,999 2019
3.9
C
779 AFRODITI
IMO 9452880
166,164 2011
3.9
C
781 STI ORCHARD
IMO 9690834
109,999 2013
3.9
C
780 STI CONDOTTI
IMO 9690810
109,999 2013
3.9
C
782 STI RAMBLA
IMO 9730880
109,999 2017
3.9
C
783 MARETA
IMO 9537927
115,795 2008
3.9
C
784 STI SANCTITY
IMO 9719707
109,999 2013
3.9
C
787 STI GLADIATOR
IMO 9722170
109,999 2017
3.9
C
786 SUNDA
IMO 9806146
79,902 2015
3.9
C
785 ZUMBI DOS PALMARES
IMO 9453810
157,055 2007
3.9
C
789 AL DASMA
IMO 9653446
109,719 2014
3.9
C
788 PROTEUS ELSIE
IMO 9923451
109,999 2020
3.9
C
794 PROTEUS BOHEMIA
IMO 9923437
109,999 2020
3.9
C
793 SAND
IMO 9379612
115,878 2009
3.9
C
792 BANIYAS
IMO 9838228
109,994 2017
3.9
C
791 AL AGAILA
IMO 9415404
164,787 2009
3.9
C
790 EAGLE KLANG
IMO 9417892
107,481 2010
3.9
C
795 NAMRATA
IMO 9401154
105,830 2008
3.9
C
800 SPETSA
IMO 9337004
150,265 2008
3.9
C
799 ALBERT
IMO 9843572
113,095 2019
3.9
C
798 STI LOMBARD
IMO 9708150
109,999 2015
3.9
C
797 ADVANTAGE SUMMER
IMO 9419890
156,527 2010
3.9
C
796 ALMI HORIZON
IMO 9579494
157,787 2011
3.9
C
Page 16 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.