Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Bulk Carriers

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#116 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
2.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-48% greener
A
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
100 KSL SEATTLE
IMO 9683245
181,015 2014
2.5
A
102 BERGE DINARA
IMO 9273985
203,163 2005
2.5
A
103 BULK TIRRENO
IMO 9624263
181,366 2013
2.5
A
104 SHANDONG DE TAI
IMO 9872121
180,701 2021
2.5
A
105 EREIKOUSSA
IMO 9591739
178,895 2012
2.5
A
108 MILLICENT
IMO 9522714
180,223 2011
2.5
A
107 MINERAL HONSHU
IMO 9614892
181,408 2012
2.5
A
106 SEAFIGHTER
IMO 9686326
181,068 2015
2.5
A
109 CAPE PEREGRINE
IMO 9500754
180,643 2012
2.5
A
110 DUCHESS LILY
IMO 9996977
82,720 2024
2.5
A
111 GH KAHLO
IMO 9617521
179,816 2014
2.5
A
112 NAVIOS KOYO
IMO 9598127
181,415 2011
2.5
A
115 FRONTIER JACARANDA
IMO 9552393
182,757 2011
2.5
A
114 SSI BRILLIANT
IMO 9567099
175,428 2012
2.5
A
113 HERO
IMO 9446867
178,076 2010
2.5
A
117 OU MAY
IMO 9751016
180,003 2017
2.5
A
116 CAPE HARMONY
IMO 9514212
178,373 2012
2.5
A
118 NSU NEWSTAR
IMO 9668348
181,133 2014
2.5
A
119 SHANDONG DREAM
IMO 9907952
207,996 2021
2.6
A
120 TRUE CONRAD
IMO 9778430
207,609 2017
2.6
A
121 PIGASSOS
IMO 9423073
176,364 2011
2.6
A
123 SHANDONG DE RUI
IMO 9872042
180,613 2020
2.6
A
122 WANG MAY
IMO 9837327
180,682 2019
2.6
A
127 STAR MARTHA
IMO 9564097
180,274 2010
2.6
A
126 HANNA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9731614
208,941 2017
2.6
A
125 AM PORT CARTIER
IMO 9546801
180,715 2013
2.6
A
124 BERGE HOVERLA
IMO 9497359
175,918 2010
2.6
A
129 CAPE IRIS
IMO 9563689
181,403 2012
2.6
A
128 STAR VESTA
IMO 9446506
180,136 2010
2.6
A
132 ZAMPA BLUE
IMO 9454163
178,459 2011
2.6
A
131 MILLIE
IMO 9492103
180,311 2009
2.6
A
130 WAH SHAN
IMO 9693551
179,546 2015
2.6
A
134 DUKESHIP
IMO 9402304
181,453 2010
2.6
A
133 SAKIZAYA TREASURE
IMO 9861328
82,500 2020
2.6
A
138 KSL SYDNEY
IMO 9683269
181,009 2014
2.6
A
137 EHIME QUEEN
IMO 9767522
181,221 2016
2.6
A
139 KSL SAPPORO
IMO 9683257
180,960 2012
2.6
A
136 NAVIOS ALTAMIRA
IMO 9589827
179,164 2006
2.6
A
135 SEATTLE SLEW
IMO 9573737
181,447 2010
2.6
A
141 MOANA INFINITY
IMO 9261932
88,233 2002
2.6
A
140 BERGE TORRE
IMO 9453731
175,935 2011
2.6
A
142 EMERALD SHENGSI
IMO 9981300
85,594 2024
2.6
A
145 GCL KRISHNA
IMO 9939931
120,326 2023
2.6
A
146 FRONTIER HARVEST
IMO 9487976
179,293 2011
2.6
A
144 KSL SAKURA
IMO 9719941
181,062 2015
2.6
A
143 SAKIZAYA UNICORN
IMO 9892676
82,527 2021
2.6
A
150 MARAN HORIZON
IMO 9702699
180,940 2016
2.6
A
149 AQUABEAUTY
IMO 9881378
82,023 2020
2.6
A
148 ANNABEL L
IMO 9853711
180,803 2019
2.6
A
147 FRONTIER BONANZA
IMO 9511947
179,435 2010
2.6
A
Page 3 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.