Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#129 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
5.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
-52% greener
A

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 275 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 659 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
101 HOSANGER
IMO 9081801
50,211 1995
5.0
A
102 FERUSA R
IMO 9668556
37,429 2014
5.0
A
103 STAR NAVARRA
IMO 9548823
51,624 2010
5.0
A
104 GOLD OAK
IMO 9806342
37,732 2017
5.0
A
105 SAGA CREST
IMO 9014066
47,069 1994
5.1
A
106 MOMI ARROW
IMO 9385506
54,204 2009
5.1
A
109 PROVIDANA
IMO 9380788
58,022 2007
5.1
A
108 EVANGELIA L
IMO 9737058
38,167 2015
5.1
A
107 BRAVE ARSENAL
IMO 9616101
33,383 2013
5.1
A
111 SAGA BEIJA-FLOR
IMO 9160798
46,990 1997
5.1
A
110 DEVBULK DEMET
IMO 9625592
32,309 2012
5.1
A
112 KULTUS COVE
IMO 9701059
37,574 2016
5.1
A
113 SAGA HORIZON
IMO 9121297
47,016 1995
5.1
A
114 SAGA FRONTIER
IMO 9343510
46,550 2007
5.1
A
116 BRASSIANA
IMO 9613290
57,536 2012
5.1
A
115 STAR MAIA
IMO 9189940
50,655 1998
5.1
A
117 IRVINE BAY
IMO 9682928
37,920 2014
5.1
A
119 SAGA FAITH
IMO 9808651
55,807 2019
5.2
A
118 SPANACO ADVENTURE
IMO 9014078
47,076 1994
5.2
A
120 LADY SERRA
IMO 9449883
30,124 2010
5.2
A
122 STAR LAGUNA
IMO 9593854
50,827 2012
5.2
A
121 BBC SATURN
IMO 9932127
40,255 2022
5.2
A
123 DEVBULK BEGUM
IMO 9625607
32,309 2012
5.2
A
124 SAGA NAVIGATOR
IMO 9371062
46,652 2007
5.2
A
125 POLSTEAM DABIE
IMO 9971850
37,592 2024
5.2
A
126 STAR MINERVA
IMO 9355513
50,757 2008
5.2
A
127 LAYLA
IMO 9973420
37,359 2023
5.2
A
128 LOCOMOTION
IMO 9667423
38,046 2013
5.2
A
130 DEVBULK ALARA
IMO 9449895
32,309 2010
5.2
A
129 SAGA ENTERPRISE
IMO 9343481
46,550 2006
5.2
A
131 NORD NANAMI
IMO 9624627
38,204 2012
5.3
A
132 BERGE JUNGFRAU
IMO 9846304
37,683 2019
5.3
A
134 STAR DALMATIA
IMO 9548835
51,588 2011
5.3
A
133 STAR LOUISIANA
IMO 9593880
50,720 2013
5.3
A
135 ICY BAY
IMO 9722467
37,570 2017
5.3
A
136 HOYANGER
IMO 9100073
50,194 1995
5.3
A
137 DEVBULK IMABARI
IMO 9550412
29,451 2009
5.3
A
140 HERANGER
IMO 9079121
50,198 1995
5.3
A
139 BBC CERES
IMO 9972490
40,600 2024
5.3
A
138 SAGA JANDAIA
IMO 9200421
47,027 1998
5.3
A
141 STAR LIVORNO
IMO 9593907
50,700 2013
5.3
A
142 SAGA ANDORINHA
IMO 9197002
47,027 1998
5.3
A
143 QUEEN ISLAND
IMO 9741188
37,802 2018
5.3
A
146 NARIE
IMO 9767728
36,648 2018
5.4
A
145 AMBER CONFIDENCE
IMO 9866550
37,720 2020
5.4
A
144 MOUNTPARK
IMO 9773844
37,839 2016
5.4
A
148 CANELO ARROW
IMO 9107318
48,077 1997
5.4
A
147 HYDRA DAWN
IMO 9607447
35,390 2013
5.4
A
149 EMERALD BAY
IMO 9385075
32,258 2008
5.4
A
150 SAGA VOYAGER
IMO 9233454
46,882 2001
5.4
A
Page 3 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.