Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#442 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-33% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 628 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

121
Q4
135
'27 Q1
85
'27 Q2
76
'27 Q3
137
'27 Q4
133
'28 Q1
95
'28 Q2
111
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,904 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,854 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,788 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,571 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,571 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,985 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,134
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,950–11,816M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,134 of 1,134 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
404 YM NAVIGATOR
IMO 9518191
81,955 2014
3.2
A
403 SYLVANER
IMO 9947275
82,412 2023
3.2
A
402 COTINGA
IMO 9786011
82,061 2019
3.2
A
401 ROSTRUM SCEPTIC
IMO 9955923
82,191 2024
3.2
A
409 GENEVAN TRADER
IMO 9846122
82,226 2020
3.2
A
408 PM HAYABUSA II
IMO 9926477
63,883 2022
3.2
A
410 MEDI GINEVRA
IMO 9815939
87,091 2018
3.2
A
407 POPEYE
IMO 9599078
98,730 2013
3.2
A
411 MONDIAL SUN
IMO 9859296
82,035 2019
3.2
A
406 STAR NICOLE
IMO 9673783
81,120 2013
3.2
A
405 NORD AQUARIUS
IMO 9941398
82,375 2022
3.2
A
414 ORIENT PEONY
IMO 9946764
82,195 2022
3.2
A
413 GALAXY GLOBE
IMO 9723629
81,167 2015
3.2
A
412 GREAT BLOSSOM
IMO 9986910
82,781 2024
3.2
A
418 CYMONA ENERGY
IMO 9638173
74,867 2012
3.2
A
421 STARDUST
IMO 9591959
78,072 2012
3.2
A
417 TZOUMAZ
IMO 9694921
89,772 2015
3.2
A
419 PACIFIC SOUTH
IMO 9474967
176,000 2012
3.2
A
416 TRITON CENTURY
IMO 9805702
82,079 2018
3.2
A
415 TATRY
IMO 9582960
82,138 2013
3.2
A
420 SENTOSA CHALLENGER
IMO 9866586
81,601 2020
3.2
A
424 JOSCO SHENGZHOU
IMO 9934175
64,250 2022
3.2
A
432 RICH AZURE
IMO 9950648
64,452 2023
3.2
A
423 BENTLEY
IMO 9847891
80,856 2019
3.2
A
434 CRIMSON EMPRESS
IMO 9485021
82,250 2014
3.2
A
433 JEWEL
IMO 9567037
175,784 2012
3.2
A
422 NORDIC NULUUJAAK
IMO 9884966
95,758 2021
3.2
A
425 SASEBO GLORY
IMO 9740823
85,020 2016
3.2
A
431 CARLTON TRADER
IMO 9937567
82,237 2023
3.2
A
430 MARAN VOYAGER
IMO 9458688
179,718 2007
3.2
A
429 NORDIC QINNGUA
IMO 9884978
95,758 2021
3.2
A
428 SCARLET ROSELLA
IMO 9609627
82,235 2015
3.2
A
427 KAVOKAMILI
IMO 9840661
85,141 2020
3.2
A
426 GLOBAL FANFARE
IMO 9969027
63,734 2023
3.2
A
436 LIEFDE
IMO 9961934
82,725 2024
3.2
A
438 ANDERMATT
IMO 9738791
77,113 2015
3.2
A
435 XING YANG HAI
IMO 9949297
85,016 2022
3.2
A
441 ATLANTIC SAMURAI
IMO 9783980
81,725 2019
3.2
A
440 DONNA ALEXANDRA
IMO 9950595
82,183 2023
3.2
A
439 KEY JOURNEY
IMO 9433640
80,591 2012
3.2
A
437 IONIC KALLIRHOE
IMO 9796195
84,769 2020
3.2
A
450 AM JYOTI
IMO 9880233
82,603 2020
3.2
A
449 YANGZE 21
IMO 9602368
82,122 2012
3.2
A
448 CL TAIZHOU
IMO 9747314
81,119 2019
3.2
A
447 FORTE SAO MARCELO
IMO 9939072
121,669 2021
3.2
A
446 GLORY CUIABA
IMO 9311189
75,886 2008
3.2
A
445 CARDIFF
IMO 9966568
90,014 2021
3.2
A
444 SWANSEA
IMO 9966570
90,023 2024
3.2
A
443 KYPROS LAND
IMO 9667368
77,060 2014
3.2
A
442 ERMIS
IMO 9723643
81,175 2016
3.2
A
Page 9 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.