Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#916 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-19% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 556C 557D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 279 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

53
Q4
60
'27 Q1
57
'27 Q2
37
'27 Q3
45
'27 Q4
71
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
34
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,874 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,757 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,371 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,195 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,185 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

411
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,668–3,970M
capex range, top measure per vessel (411 of 411 with computable scaling)
0.26–0.49 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 ADVANTAGE LIFE
IMO 9708564
109,999 2015
4.1
C
902 IONIC ASPIS
IMO 9523287
107,508 2011
4.1
C
903 BONITA
IMO 9297541
108,386 2006
4.1
C
904 PALLADIUM
IMO 9773923
113,221 2017
4.1
C
905 ANDRE REBOUCAS
IMO 9453846
157,055 2015
4.1
C
906 CATALAN SEA
IMO 9577044
116,620 2012
4.1
C
907 HUA LIN WAN
IMO 9614086
109,475 2012
4.1
C
908 YINGHAO CONFIDENCE
IMO 9389978
107,600 2010
4.1
C
909 JAG AANCHAL
IMO 9390161
74,811 2008
4.1
C
910 AMAZON VICTORY
IMO 9660358
72,412 2014
4.1
C
911 JAARLI
IMO 9892432
112,459 2021
4.1
C
912 SCORPIO
IMO 9389071
107,157 2009
4.1
C
913 GREEN ATTITUDE
IMO 9808156
112,532 2018
4.1
C
914 AMAZON
IMO 9476654
149,999 2011
4.1
C
915 SFL PANTHER
IMO 9664782
115,238 2015
4.1
C
916 LUCKY TRADER
IMO 9952608
49,813 2022
4.1
C
917 IASONAS
IMO 9419357
115,500 2009
4.1
C
918 HAFNIA SHINANO
IMO 9506069
76,594 2008
4.1
C
919 DONEGAL SPIRIT
IMO 9312846
105,611 2006
4.1
C
920 DELTA STAR
IMO 9458016
115,618 2013
4.1
C
921 CIELO BIANCO
IMO 9778296
74,999 2017
4.1
C
922 STI OXFORD
IMO 9697595
109,999 2015
4.1
C
923 CSK VANGUARD
IMO 9728423
114,667 2016
4.1
C
924 ADVANTAGE PADOVA
IMO 9794848
75,342 2019
4.2
C
925 SAGA
IMO 9528031
115,738 2011
4.2
C
926 STI PARK
IMO 9690793
109,999 2013
4.2
C
927 STI GOAL
IMO 9717125
109,999 2016
4.2
C
928 GULF CORAL
IMO 9389851
74,999 2009
4.2
C
929 CIELO ROSSO
IMO 9778301
74,999 2015
4.2
C
930 STI KINGSWAY
IMO 9712852
109,999 2015
4.2
C
931 CAPTAIN A. STELLATOS
IMO 9439670
105,848 2010
4.2
C
932 A LEOPARD
IMO 9838589
114,066 2021
4.2
C
933 SYROS WARRIOR
IMO 9370850
107,687 2005
4.2
C
934 TYRRHENIAN SEA
IMO 9829100
114,218 2019
4.2
C
935 HAFNIA YANGTZE
IMO 9393096
76,578 2009
4.2
C
936 BNEIDER
IMO 9595010
110,587 2012
4.2
C
937 ALTAI
IMO 9446427
115,952 2011
4.2
C
938 MINERVA ELLIE
IMO 9297321
103,195 2005
4.2
C
939 APSOGOS
IMO 9282053
115,444 2004
4.2
C
940 LEYTE SPIRIT
IMO 9484089
109,670 2011
4.2
C
941 DUGI OTOK
IMO 9334727
108,414 2008
4.2
C
942 ALYARMOUK
IMO 9356438
116,038 2008
4.2
C
943 ARCTICA
IMO 9305556
117,099 2005
4.2
C
944 HAFNIA PRECISION
IMO 9760213
74,997 2016
4.2
C
945 P. MONTEREY
IMO 9568172
105,525 2011
4.2
C
946 LIWA-V
IMO 9489039
105,221 2011
4.2
C
947 BLUE PRINCE
IMO 9429182
109,010 2009
4.2
C
948 NEW VISION
IMO 9804459
157,617 2018
4.2
C
949 SEA JEWEL
IMO 9607722
112,081 2013
4.2
C
950 ALPES
IMO 9817470
112,504 2018
4.2
C
Page 19 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.