Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#513 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
7.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-26% greener
B

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
501 LADY MARIELLA
IMO 9644433
39,316 2013
6.9
B
502 DDELPHINUS 12
IMO 9359375
46,011 2010
6.9
B
503 LADYBUG
IMO 9391385
37,527 2008
6.9
B
504 MONARCH
IMO 9461661
49,999 2011
6.9
B
505 MARQUETTE
IMO 9732785
37,596 2016
6.9
B
507 NCC SHAMS
IMO 9459010
45,468 2012
6.9
B
506 STORE BAY
IMO 9733698
30,711 2015
6.9
B
510 INTERMEZZO
IMO 9804825
37,328 2019
6.9
B
509 MEDALTA ADVENTURER
IMO 9761451
30,727 2015
6.9
B
508 BOW ELM
IMO 9388302
46,098 2011
6.9
B
511 HAFNIA TURQUOISE
IMO 9753674
49,516 2016
7.0
B
512 BOW LIND
IMO 9388314
46,047 2011
7.0
B
514 MRC NAZENDE
IMO 9419735
51,291 2009
7.0
B
513 ARDMORE ENDURANCE
IMO 9654567
49,466 2013
7.0
B
515 HAFNIA VIOLETTE
IMO 9690626
49,126 2015
7.0
B
516 FAUSKANGER
IMO 9387700
46,180 2009
7.0
B
517 MARLIN AMMOLITE
IMO 9697246
49,999 2016
7.0
B
518 RED GARNET
IMO 9694359
49,999 2015
7.0
B
519 STOLT COURAGE
IMO 9296731
32,858 2004
7.0
B
520 VALLE SOLE
IMO 9635781
49,999 2013
7.0
B
521 MANDAL
IMO 9732773
37,596 2016
7.0
B
522 BOW FLORA
IMO 9143207
37,369 1998
7.0
B
524 PTI NILE
IMO 9747338
49,999 2014
7.0
B
523 STENA IMPECCABLE
IMO 9693020
49,737 2017
7.0
B
525 GRANDE RIVIERE
IMO 9733686
30,732 2015
7.0
B
527 SC SCORPIO
IMO 9801079
40,964 2017
7.0
B
526 JIPRO NEFTIS
IMO 9459292
34,858 2011
7.0
B
528 MERAPI
IMO 9430167
46,872 2006
7.0
B
529 IONIAN SEA
IMO 9322384
48,315 2005
7.1
B
531 VINJERAC
IMO 9489194
49,999 2011
7.1
B
530 STENA IMPRESSION
IMO 9667461
49,776 2015
7.1
B
532 ASPROUDA
IMO 9478729
74,011 2013
7.1
B
533 NCC QASSIM
IMO 9306811
46,038 2006
7.1
B
534 CIELO DI SALERNO
IMO 9717292
39,309 2016
7.1
B
535 DIVA
IMO 9760548
37,296 2017
7.1
B
536 NCC NAJEM
IMO 9459022
45,499 2012
7.1
B
538 NAVIG8 EXCEL
IMO 9973901
49,127 2024
7.1
B
537 AQUADISIAC
IMO 9396713
50,695 2008
7.1
B
539 STOLT APAL
IMO 9719240
32,798 2016
7.1
B
540 SOLAR SHERIDAN
IMO 9877652
25,039 2021
7.1
B
542 LINUS P
IMO 9749350
32,247 2014
7.1
B
543 AMIF
IMO 9396373
40,429 2008
7.1
B
541 VELEBIT
IMO 9455741
49,999 2011
7.1
B
544 BOW TRAJECTORY
IMO 9669873
49,622 2014
7.1
B
545 BRISTOL TRADER
IMO 9737101
35,863 2016
7.2
B
546 TG CRAB
IMO 9400394
33,624 2009
7.2
B
550 SKYLIGHT
IMO 9396737
50,926 2008
7.2
B
549 BOW HERCULES
IMO 9752046
40,847 2017
7.2
B
548 STOLT PONDO
IMO 9374521
33,232 2007
7.2
B
547 HENG HUI YONG WANG
IMO 9294288
34,614 2004
7.2
B
Page 11 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.