Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#641 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
10.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-26% greener
B

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 271 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 756 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 652 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
603 TIMBERLAND
IMO 9204790
20,406 2000
9.8
B
602 VERTOM TOMMA
IMO 9938743
7,281 2023
9.8
B
601 BRAVE WARRIOR
IMO 7208728
6,336 1972
9.8
B
604 LAKE ERIE
IMO 9283540
27,781 2004
9.8
B
605 KING JOY
IMO 9537472
16,807 2009
9.8
B
606 ADAPEARL
IMO 9539432
12,427 2011
9.9
B
607 NORD LOTUS
IMO 9742390
16,963 2015
9.9
B
608 FLEVOBORG
IMO 9419292
14,603 2010
9.9
B
609 DA DE
IMO 9608403
29,572 2014
9.9
B
610 ALPPILA
IMO 9381706
20,499 2011
9.9
B
611 MUZAFFER ANA
IMO 9554157
12,447 2010
9.9
B
613 FIVELBORG
IMO 9419307
14,575 2010
9.9
B
612 PROGRESS IV
IMO 8358130
7,400 2006
9.9
B
614 BOHWA AMOY
IMO 9300958
10,084 2005
9.9
B
615 DA XIN
IMO 9608427
29,565 2014
10.0
B
616 THAMESBORG
IMO 9546459
21,359 2013
10.0
B
618 JOY LINE
IMO 9370094
14,376 2007
10.0
B
617 PRINCESS MARIAM
IMO 9407005
7,004 2006
10.0
B
620 ARIF AMCA
IMO 9616084
11,086 2012
10.0
B
619 CHIPOLBROK SUN
IMO 9272230
30,435 2004
10.0
B
621 PADEREWSKI
IMO 9731389
31,673 2016
10.1
B
622 SUNDRY
IMO 9045651
7,321 2000
10.1
B
625 VERACRUZ
IMO 9521849
19,596 2012
10.1
B
624 TOPTERIX
IMO 9630016
10,487 2011
10.1
B
623 ASH BALTIC
IMO 9606493
13,121 2011
10.1
B
626 ADNAN N
IMO 9334973
11,776 2006
10.1
B
627 NOWOWIEJSKI
IMO 9710189
31,664 2016
10.1
B
628 ROYAL II
IMO 9355109
13,721 2007
10.2
B
630 SAADET
IMO 9522063
12,198 2009
10.2
B
632 PRINCE JOY
IMO 9644251
22,983 2012
10.2
B
629 SELECTA
IMO 9424807
14,030 2007
10.2
B
631 SIDER TAYRONA
IMO 9728849
14,695 2015
10.2
B
633 MATSUSHIRO
IMO 9477672
13,815 2009
10.2
B
634 ANT
IMO 9412311
5,095 2006
10.3
B
636 KARANFIL
IMO 9369162
12,616 2008
10.3
B
635 FRASERBORG
IMO 9419319
14,583 2011
10.3
B
637 SANTORINI
IMO 9181493
24,175 1998
10.3
B
638 FWN ADRIATIC
IMO 9970533
12,544 2025
10.3
B
640 ATA 2
IMO 9387669
6,555 2006
10.3
B
639 WLADYSLAW ORKAN
IMO 9271925
30,435 2003
10.3
B
643 YM EVEREST
IMO 9653812
16,717 2014
10.3
B
642 LUCKY
IMO 9037305
10,605 2002
10.3
B
641 TIBER RIVER
IMO 9650949
7,402 2014
10.3
B
644 AKDENIZ S
IMO 9519377
9,161 2008
10.3
B
645 IMMENSITY
IMO 9171395
10,979 2002
10.3
B
646 BUYUFIX
IMO 9538957
8,488 2010
10.4
B
647 ISMAIL S
IMO 9546007
12,952 2011
10.4
B
648 EXEBORG
IMO 9650482
11,950 2013
10.4
B
649 SEHER YAGCI
IMO 9556911
10,450 2009
10.4
B
650 LIDER HALIL
IMO 9462275
10,264 2020
10.4
B
Page 13 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.