Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#582 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
9.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
-31% greener
B

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
552 CHIPOLBROK GALAXY
IMO 9432141
30,330 2010
9.2
B
551 ATLANTA
IMO 9513373
12,223 2009
9.2
B
553 LEOPOLD STAFF
IMO 9272228
30,469 2004
9.2
B
554 BEATRIX
IMO 9419280
14,603 2009
9.2
B
555 XIA MEN ZE SHUN
IMO 9695107
27,263 2014
9.2
B
556 ASH ADRIATIC
IMO 9614830
11,396 2012
9.3
B
557 MATTEO BR
IMO 9556844
25,000 2010
9.3
B
558 LAKE ST. CLAIR
IMO 9315549
27,740 2005
9.3
B
559 MAXIMUS-1
IMO 9344734
10,632 2004
9.3
B
560 VERTOM CYTA
IMO 9938731
7,281 2023
9.3
B
561 ADAVEGA
IMO 9539339
12,427 2010
9.3
B
563 AAL PUSAN
IMO 9498389
32,279 2012
9.3
B
562 EGBERT WAGENBORG
IMO 9802695
14,367 2017
9.3
B
564 FISHER
IMO 9177791
12,974 1999
9.3
B
565 MARIA FRANCISCA
IMO 9235361
30,320 2004
9.3
B
566 ARKLOW WIND
IMO 9818943
16,861 2019
9.4
B
567 VERTOM ANETTE
IMO 9972763
7,292 2024
9.4
B
569 SIENNA
IMO 9353022
8,163 2005
9.4
B
568 ARKLOW WOOD
IMO 9818967
16,861 2020
9.4
B
570 ORUBA
IMO 9430624
10,611 2007
9.4
B
571 ADAROSE
IMO 9392107
12,497 2009
9.4
B
572 MARIA JOSE
IMO 9593672
24,964 2011
9.5
B
573 MISJE ROSE
IMO 9967548
5,310 2024
9.5
B
575 ULTRA KUROSHIO
IMO 1057543
13,796 2025
9.5
B
574 VERTOM LISA
IMO 9972775
7,280 2024
9.5
B
576 MUHARREM DADAYLI
IMO 9558581
13,449 2010
9.5
B
577 BLUE CAPRAMAR
IMO 9641845
7,800 2012
9.5
B
578 PEACE
IMO 9553983
16,817 2012
9.5
B
579 LAKE ONTARIO
IMO 9283538
27,783 2004
9.6
B
580 SIRUS SKY
IMO 9648738
7,800 2012
9.6
B
581 ZI JING SONG
IMO 9608910
27,402 2012
9.6
B
582 WO LONG SONG
IMO 9416783
27,354 2010
9.6
B
583 SANDSTAD
IMO 1028956
8,583 2025
9.6
B
584 JADE I
IMO 9162411
25,012 1998
9.6
B
585 WESER STAHL
IMO 9186687
47,257 1999
9.6
B
586 LADY AYSE
IMO 9227871
16,239 2001
9.7
B
587 FINNBORG
IMO 9419321
14,603 2011
9.7
B
588 MOHAMAD Y
IMO 8107000
11,990 1982
9.7
B
589 PATAGONMAN
IMO 9521851
18,858 2012
9.7
B
590 ICDAS-5
IMO 9829916
15,621 2019
9.7
B
591 MIKAWA
IMO 9354208
14,078 2006
9.8
B
593 ARKLOW WILLOW
IMO 9818955
16,861 2019
9.8
B
592 LADY ESMA
IMO 9402110
31,612 2009
9.8
B
594 TRINITYBORG
IMO 9546485
21,277 2013
9.8
B
595 ARAGONBORG
IMO 9466312
17,294 2010
9.8
B
598 TIMBERLAND
IMO 9204790
20,406 2000
9.8
B
597 BRAVE WARRIOR
IMO 7208728
6,336 1972
9.8
B
596 VERTOM TOMMA
IMO 9938743
7,281 2023
9.8
B
599 LAKE ERIE
IMO 9283540
27,781 2004
9.8
B
600 KING JOY
IMO 9537472
16,808 2009
9.8
B
Page 12 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.