Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#404 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
7.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.91)
-50% greener
A

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,034B 685C 507D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 223 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

45
Q4
39
'27 Q1
40
'27 Q2
34
'27 Q3
32
'27 Q4
30
'28 Q1
35
'28 Q2
28
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 752 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 648 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.18
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.44
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
401 GULLHOLMEN ISLAND
IMO 9605085
38,309 2011
7.0
A
400 MADDOX
IMO 9277486
32,354 2005
7.0
A
403 SEREF KURU
IMO 8606111
13,047 1987
7.0
A
404 CEDAR ARROW
IMO 9232802
47,817 2001
7.0
A
406 SENATOR
IMO 9117612
29,458 1996
7.0
A
405 GLORIEUSE
IMO 9646429
38,338 2012
7.0
A
407 PETRA
IMO 9597630
33,688 2011
7.0
A
408 GLENPARK
IMO 9781621
37,838 2017
7.1
A
410 NALINEE NAREE
IMO 9302906
31,699 2005
7.1
A
409 UBC SALERNO
IMO 9652519
32,702 2013
7.1
A
412 PRINCESS LAYLA
IMO 9149677
29,501 1998
7.1
A
411 MANTA MERVE
IMO 9597678
37,118 2012
7.1
A
413 ALIATTIN D
IMO 1074905
8,521 2025
7.1
A
414 CS FAITH
IMO 9509700
33,210 2011
7.1
A
415 PACIFIC HARMONY
IMO 9701451
31,798 2015
7.2
A
416 TURAN C
IMO 9558490
18,429 2010
7.2
A
417 USG ZURICH
IMO 9458444
28,309 2013
7.2
A
418 REGGEBORG
IMO 9592575
23,296 2014
7.2
A
419 BAHRI RIYADH
IMO 9695224
31,777 2014
7.2
A
420 HAAGA
IMO 9797632
25,600 2018
7.3
A
421 INUYAMA
IMO 9392080
19,922 2009
7.3
A
422 V MONOCEROS
IMO 9478470
33,145 2011
7.3
A
423 AMALIA
IMO 9973327
14,389 2024
7.3
A
424 ECO TIDE
IMO 9576739
35,916 2011
7.3
A
425 LADY HATICE
IMO 9413078
18,930 2009
7.4
A
426 NEREUS
IMO 9400916
32,280 2010
7.4
A
427 NORD BRAVE
IMO 9473690
33,745 2011
7.4
A
428 LADY RANIA
IMO 9123099
29,538 1996
7.4
A
429 MJ MAYA
IMO 9261011
31,842 2002
7.4
A
430 SUPERNOVA B
IMO 9610212
36,261 2012
7.4
A
432 LADY MERAL
IMO 9311311
32,131 2005
7.5
A
431 ABDULLAH M
IMO 9295579
32,347 2004
7.5
A
433 MANTA HATICE
IMO 9338565
31,931 2007
7.5
A
434 MISJE IRIS
IMO 1049728
5,309 2025
7.5
A
435 TIAN SHOU
IMO 9704752
38,134 2016
7.5
A
436 JESSICA B
IMO 9262534
37,384 2003
7.5
A
437 CHIPOLBROK MOON
IMO 9272216
30,435 2004
7.5
A
438 CHIPOL CHANGAN
IMO 9509645
33,175 2010
7.5
A
439 XIA MEN ZE PING
IMO 9304019
27,415 2006
7.5
A
440 ESSAYRA
IMO 9735452
35,084 2016
7.5
A
441 BOLTEN SYMI
IMO 9427380
25,951 2009
7.5
A
442 ATLANTIC ORCHARD
IMO 9638159
34,317 2014
7.5
A
443 SIDER ONDA
IMO 9700316
40,482 2015
7.6
A
444 IKEBANA
IMO 9186209
45,038 1999
7.6
A
445 UBC SANTOS
IMO 9376000
31,569 2008
7.6
A
447 EMINE AKAY
IMO 9580211
16,233 2011
7.6
A
446 AGIOS FANOURIOS
IMO 9465368
33,261 2009
7.6
A
448 DA DAN XIA
IMO 9451290
28,451 2009
7.7
A
449 PRINCE FAROUK
IMO 9125229
26,412 1997
7.7
A
450 POLESTAR
IMO 9278167
31,818 2004
7.7
A
Page 9 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.