Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#472 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
5.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-48% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 443 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

95
Q4
83
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
59
'27 Q3
74
'27 Q4
115
'28 Q1
84
'28 Q2
66
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.26
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
450 MSC TARANTO
IMO 9475258
14,036 TEU 2011
5.1
B
452 COSCO EXCELLENCE
IMO 9472189
13,700 TEU 2012
5.1
B
454 MSC TRIESTE
IMO 9484479
13,050 TEU 2011
5.1
B
453 MSC ISTANBUL
IMO 9606326
16,652 TEU 2015
5.1
B
455 MAERSK ESSEN
IMO 9456783
13,100 TEU 2010
5.1
B
456 CMA CGM BOUGAINVILLE
IMO 9702156
17,554 TEU 2015
5.1
B
457 AL DAHNA EXPRESS
IMO 9708825
19,870 TEU 2016
5.1
B
459 AL JASRAH
IMO 9732321
14,993 TEU 2016
5.1
B
458 EVER GIFTED
IMO 9786827
20,124 TEU 2018
5.1
B
462 YM TIPTOP
IMO 9860946
12,726 TEU 2021
5.1
B
461 MSC DILETTA
IMO 9897004
23,656 TEU 2021
5.1
B
460 APL LION CITY
IMO 9631967
17,292 TEU 2013
5.1
B
465 MSC VALERIA
IMO 9461439
14,036 TEU 2012
5.1
B
464 HMM HANBADA
IMO 9869203
14,000 TEU 2021
5.1
B
463 MAERSK SERANGOON
IMO 9315214
5,648 TEU 2007
5.1
B
466 PANAMA EXPRESS
IMO 9641223
6,927 TEU 2013
5.2
B
467 COSCO GLORY
IMO 9466245
13,100 TEU 2011
5.2
B
470 YM WIND
IMO 9708461
14,078 TEU 2017
5.2
B
469 HYUNDAI EARTH
IMO 9725110
10,055 TEU 2016
5.2
B
468 MSC GABON
IMO 9974539
8,300 TEU 2024
5.2
B
471 HMM HOPE
IMO 9637234
13,050 TEU 2014
5.2
B
472 HYUNDAI NEPTUNE
IMO 9725158
10,000 TEU 2016
5.2
B
473 OOCL MALAYSIA
IMO 9627980
13,200 TEU 2011
5.2
B
478 MSC VANDYA
IMO 9484467
13,050 TEU 2012
5.2
B
477 EVER GREET
IMO 9832729
20,160 TEU 2019
5.2
B
476 AFIF
IMO 9732345
14,993 TEU 2017
5.2
B
475 AL DHAIL
IMO 9732307
14,993 TEU 2016
5.2
B
474 SEASPAN BEYOND
IMO 9739678
10,100 TEU 2016
5.2
B
481 EVER GLORY
IMO 9786839
20,150 TEU 2019
5.2
B
480 COSCO SHIPPING SAKURA
IMO 9785794
13,500 TEU 2018
5.2
B
479 CMA CGM JULES VERNE
IMO 9454450
16,000 TEU 2013
5.2
B
483 CMA CGM OSIRIS
IMO 9882504
15,000 TEU 2021
5.2
B
482 ONE RECOGNITION
IMO 9952701
7,000 TEU 2024
5.2
B
484 MSC AURIGA
IMO 9857183
15,000 TEU 2020
5.2
B
488 YM WINNER
IMO 9684689
14,080 TEU 2015
5.2
B
487 MSC SOFIA
IMO 9927275
14,812 TEU 2023
5.2
B
489 APL SINGAPURA
IMO 9632002
17,292 TEU 2013
5.2
B
486 SEASPAN BEAUTY
IMO 9713349
10,100 TEU 2015
5.2
B
490 COSCO SHIPPING SCORPIO
IMO 9789635
19,273 TEU 2018
5.2
B
485 JADE I
IMO 9968059
7,000 TEU 2024
5.2
B
491 MSC SIXIN
IMO 9839301
23,656 TEU 2019
5.2
B
492 YM WELLSPRING
IMO 9757230
13,870 TEU 2019
5.2
B
493 EVER GOVERN
IMO 9832717
20,000 TEU 2015
5.2
B
496 YM WELLBEING
IMO 9820908
14,000 TEU 2015
5.2
B
495 CMA CGM BUTTERFLY
IMO 9365790
9,661 TEU 2008
5.2
B
494 OOCL VERACRUZ
IMO 9979266
5,920 TEU 2021
5.2
B
500 TIHAMA
IMO 9736107
18,800 TEU 2016
5.2
B
499 MSC ELAINE
IMO 9393321
8,600 TEU 2009
5.2
B
498 MSC AMSTERDAM
IMO 9606338
16,652 TEU 2015
5.2
B
497 EVER MUSE
IMO 9935349
15,000 TEU 2025
5.2
B
Page 10 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.