Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#3,468 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
8.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+83% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3451 SKIPPER PLANET
IMO 9060730
22,176 1993
8.7
E
3452 GULNAK
IMO 9579028
35,166 2011
8.7
E
3453 PIRIN
IMO 9381861
21,211 2007
8.7
E
3454 AFRICAN JACARANDA
IMO 9354076
18,909 2007
8.7
E
3455 GLOBAL HARMONY
IMO 9473573
34,529 2010
8.7
E
3456 RUN CHEN 2
IMO 9611618
32,709 2011
8.7
E
3457 ABK LEGEND
IMO 9238674
30,039 2002
8.7
E
3458 CS CAPRICE
IMO 9406104
30,487 2010
8.7
E
3459 IC PROGRESS
IMO 9611577
32,527 2011
8.7
E
3460 SIDER AMBOS
IMO 9805295
19,998 2017
8.7
E
3461 CS CRYSTAL
IMO 9406128
30,478 2010
8.8
E
3462 ELAR TRADER
IMO 9409534
37,782 2010
8.8
E
3463 HONORINE
IMO 9146974
28,542 1996
8.8
E
3464 RAVNI KOTARI
IMO 9489168
34,373 2010
8.9
E
3465 CLIPPER TYNE
IMO 9594535
31,905 2012
8.9
E
3466 ASIA SPIRIT
IMO 9637430
35,031 2006
8.9
E
3467 TRUE BROTHER
IMO 9243693
31,812 2001
8.9
E
3468 AURELIA
IMO 9392133
23,641 2009
8.9
E
3469 SAKAR
IMO 9104811
21,583 1995
8.9
E
3470 WICKO
IMO 9393474
30,379 2010
8.9
E
3471 BOBIC
IMO 9317781
31,896 2006
8.9
E
3472 LEGEND
IMO 9587685
24,319 2010
8.9
E
3473 HOPE
IMO 9460277
35,957 2010
8.9
E
3474 CHESTNUT
IMO 9477866
30,810 2010
9.0
E
3475 SAMENTHA
IMO 9118264
16,860 1998
9.0
E
3476 AK LIZA
IMO 9300855
30,541 2007
9.1
E
3477 CENTURY BRIGHT
IMO 9694866
16,210 2014
9.1
E
3478 SANDNES
IMO 9306029
27,711 2005
9.1
E
3479 LADY SPERANZA
IMO 9200574
16,870 2000
9.1
E
3480 REK R
IMO 9085895
16,857 1997
9.1
E
3481 SUPRA
IMO 9397200
16,648 2006
9.1
E
3482 JIN YUAN LING
IMO 9487081
31,771 2009
9.1
E
3483 LABRADOR
IMO 9415222
30,899 2010
9.1
E
3484 YA HUSSEIN
IMO 9114490
24,290 1996
9.2
E
3485 LITA
IMO 9117416
18,305 1995
9.2
E
3486 THOE
IMO 9400588
12,500 2006
9.2
E
3487 HTK NEPTUNE
IMO 9329411
37,426 2007
9.2
E
3488 TZAREVNA
IMO 9145231
21,470 2004
9.2
E
3489 AL KARRAR
IMO 9076387
27,308 1994
9.2
E
3490 ONEGO WISLA
IMO 9521875
18,833 2012
9.2
E
3491 DRAWSKO
IMO 9393450
30,487 2010
9.3
E
3492 SPARTA
IMO 9524803
18,969 2009
9.3
E
3493 SIDER KING
IMO 9615913
25,467 2011
9.3
E
3494 SHOVELER
IMO 9459979
30,928 2009
9.3
E
3495 MBC DAISY
IMO 9609902
15,332 2011
9.3
E
3496 YUKA D
IMO 9586710
34,270 2011
9.3
E
3497 VENI
IMO 9611589
32,526 2011
9.3
E
3498 CSL THAMES
IMO 9440447
29,827 2006
9.4
E
3499 CELINA
IMO 9119074
24,325 1995
9.4
E
3500 EQUATOR
IMO 9363766
18,965 2008
9.4
E
Page 70 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.