Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#518 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
5.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-46% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,080 at D/E
A 313B 411C 706D 599E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 556 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

97
Q4
99
'27 Q1
72
'27 Q2
77
'27 Q3
94
'27 Q4
119
'28 Q1
105
'28 Q2
95
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,670 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,443 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,346 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 952 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 782 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 369 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

636
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,283–7,763M
capex range, top measure per vessel (636 of 636 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.64 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,208
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.25
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
501 EVER MUSE
IMO 9935349
15,000 TEU 2025
5.2
B
500 TIHAMA
IMO 9736107
18,800 TEU 2016
5.2
B
505 MSC JEWEL
IMO 9842073
14,272 TEU 2019
5.2
B
504 HMM SKY
IMO 9976599
85,516 2025
5.2
B
503 MAYA BAY
IMO 9983401
2,954 TEU 2023
5.2
B
506 MSC MAYA
IMO 9708679
19,224 TEU 2015
5.2
B
507 ALS CERES
IMO 9938303
7,165 TEU 2023
5.3
B
508 CSCL PACIFIC OCEAN
IMO 9695133
18,982 TEU 2014
5.3
B
511 COSCO SHIPPING ALPS
IMO 9757864
14,568 TEU 2018
5.3
B
510 EVER GENIUS
IMO 9786815
20,150 TEU 2018
5.3
B
509 EVER MEED
IMO 9935258
15,000 TEU 2024
5.3
B
512 MSC SOLA
IMO 9401104
11,668 TEU 2008
5.3
B
513 AL NEFUD
IMO 9708813
19,870 TEU 2015
5.3
B
514 EBBA MAERSK
IMO 9321524
11,000 TEU 2007
5.3
B
515 GREENFIELD
IMO 9970026
7,200 TEU 2024
5.3
B
517 CMA CGM ENDURANCE
IMO 9951549
7,600 TEU 2024
5.3
B
516 MSC ARIANE
IMO 9484443
13,050 TEU 2012
5.3
B
521 EVER GIVEN
IMO 9811000
20,000 TEU 2015
5.3
B
520 HMM DRIVE
IMO 9637246
13,154 TEU 2014
5.3
B
519 MSC DITTE
IMO 9754953
19,224 TEU 2016
5.3
B
518 EVER GLOBE
IMO 9786841
20,150 TEU 2019
5.3
B
522 KIEL EXPRESS
IMO 9229855
7,506 TEU 2003
5.4
B
523 MSC OLIVER
IMO 9703306
19,224 TEU 2015
5.4
B
524 EVER GENTLE
IMO 9820922
20,000 TEU 2019
5.4
B
525 MSC FAITH
IMO 9842085
14,272 TEU 2019
5.4
B
526 YM WREATH
IMO 9708473
14,078 TEU 2017
5.4
B
529 MSC ERICA
IMO 9755191
19,224 TEU 2016
5.4
B
528 EXPRESS BRAZIL
IMO 9443023
3,398 TEU 2010
5.4
B
527 APL TEMASEK
IMO 9631955
17,292 TEU 2013
5.4
B
531 COSCO JAPAN
IMO 9448748
8,500 TEU 2010
5.4
B
530 MSC GENOVA
IMO 9461386
14,036 TEU 2010
5.4
B
532 MSC DEILA
IMO 9461415
14,036 TEU 2012
5.4
B
533 MAERSK SHIVLING
IMO 9728253
9,162 TEU 2016
5.4
B
534 TAMPA TRIUMPH
IMO 9737462
13,870 TEU 2017
5.4
B
536 COSCO INDONESIA
IMO 9448786
8,500 TEU 2010
5.4
B
535 MSC GAIA
IMO 9401142
13,798 TEU 2010
5.4
B
539 ELLY MAERSK
IMO 9321536
11,000 TEU 2007
5.4
B
538 NINGBO EXPRESS
IMO 9229843
7,506 TEU 2002
5.4
B
537 AL RIFFA
IMO 9525912
13,296 TEU 2012
5.4
B
540 MAERSK CHAMBAL
IMO 9525376
4,500 TEU 2008
5.5
B
541 EVER LAWFUL
IMO 9595498
8,000 TEU 2012
5.5
B
543 MSC DANIELA
IMO 9399002
13,798 TEU 2008
5.5
B
542 CMA CGM TIGA
IMO 9938418
5,598 TEU 2025
5.5
B
544 MSC KATIE
IMO 9467457
12,400 TEU 2012
5.5
B
546 CAP SAN ARTEMISSIO
IMO 9633939
9,600 TEU 2014
5.5
B
545 MSC BIANCA
IMO 9770749
12,091 TEU 2019
5.5
B
548 CAP SAN SOUNIO
IMO 9633953
9,600 TEU 2014
5.5
B
547 CONTI CRYSTAL
IMO 9293820
8,084 TEU 2006
5.5
B
550 NICARAGUA EXPRESS
IMO 9635676
6,900 TEU 2013
5.5
B
549 OOCL KOREA
IMO 9627992
13,200 TEU 2011
5.5
B
Page 11 of 44 — 2,163 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.