Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,060 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
8.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-19% greener
C
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 LARS MAERSK
IMO 9294379
4,300 TEU 2004
7.9
C
1052 COSCO SHANGHAI
IMO 9221097
5,618 TEU 2001
7.9
C
1053 CMA CGM HARMONY
IMO 9952828
7,000 TEU 2021
7.9
C
1054 LONDON EXPRESS
IMO 9143568
4,612 TEU 1998
8.0
C
1056 MSC FABIENNE
IMO 9279965
4,862 TEU 2004
8.0
C
1055 MAERSK LEON
IMO 9526966
8,700 TEU 2012
8.0
C
1058 HMM PLATINUM
IMO 9637155
5,000 TEU 2013
8.0
C
1057 MSC JERSEY
IMO 9622007
4,800 TEU 2014
8.0
C
1059 MSC LILY
IMO 9704960
8,800 TEU 2015
8.0
C
1060 ROTTERDAM
IMO 9398450
9,262 TEU 2010
8.0
C
1061 W KYRENIA
IMO 9211494
6,802 TEU 2001
8.0
C
1062 CMA CGM NABUCCO
IMO 9299630
8,200 TEU 2006
8.0
C
1063 WIKING
IMO 9708382
4,771 TEU 2016
8.0
C
1066 CMA CGM CHIWAN
IMO 9224312
4,253 TEU 2001
8.0
C
1065 CONTI CHIVALRY
IMO 9293791
8,084 TEU 2006
8.0
C
1064 SANTA CLARA MAERSK
IMO 9444716
7,090 TEU 2010
8.0
C
1067 KOTA KAYA
IMO 9307401
3,081 TEU 2005
8.0
C
1068 MSC ROSHNEY V
IMO 9337676
4,888 TEU 2007
8.0
C
1069 EVER EXCEL
IMO 9241322
6,323 TEU 2002
8.1
C
1070 KOTKA
IMO 9085534
6,418 TEU 1996
8.1
C
1072 ACHELOOS
IMO 9972995
2,800 TEU 2024
8.1
C
1071 MAERSK IDAHO
IMO 9193264
4,338 TEU 2000
8.1
C
1074 HMM COLOMBO
IMO 9323508
6,763 TEU 2007
8.1
C
1073 MONTE TAMARO
IMO 9357949
4,000 TEU 2007
8.1
C
1075 MSC VIDHI
IMO 9238739
5,514 TEU 2001
8.1
C
1076 NYK ROMULUS
IMO 9416989
4,888 TEU 2010
8.1
C
1077 SANTA INES
IMO 9444845
7,114 TEU 2012
8.1
C
1079 MSC ELBE III
IMO 9236688
2,524 TEU 2001
8.1
C
1078 MSC ELA
IMO 9282259
4,900 TEU 2004
8.1
C
1082 API BHUM
IMO 9292149
4,944 TEU 2004
8.1
C
1081 MSC BRUNELLA
IMO 9702106
8,819 TEU 2015
8.1
C
1080 MAERSK UTAH
IMO 9305300
4,154 TEU 2006
8.1
C
1083 MSC TIANJIN
IMO 9285471
8,063 TEU 2005
8.1
C
1084 MSC JOHANNESBURG V
IMO 9252242
4,200 TEU 2003
8.1
C
1086 NINGBO
IMO 9398400
7,500 TEU 2009
8.1
C
1085 MSC SAMANTHA VI
IMO 9110377
5,551 TEU 1996
8.1
C
1087 GREEN BAY
IMO 9983437
2,954 TEU 2022
8.1
C
1089 MSC ATLANTIC III
IMO 8913447
2,668 TEU 1991
8.1
C
1088 HMM OAKLAND
IMO 9385013
6,350 TEU 2009
8.1
C
1090 JOLLY ARGENTO
IMO 9467043
4,600 TEU 2010
8.2
C
1091 MSC LAGOS X
IMO 9605152
9,400 TEU 2013
8.2
C
1092 MSC SUEZ
IMO 8918978
2,668 TEU 1993
8.2
C
1095 HMM TACOMA
IMO 9385001
6,350 TEU 2009
8.2
C
1094 MSC PRELUDE V
IMO 9450325
4,600 TEU 2009
8.2
C
1093 FORT DESAIX
IMO 9400174
4,043 TEU 2010
8.2
C
1098 MOL PROFICIENCY
IMO 9403619
6,350 TEU 2007
8.2
C
1097 YM CREDIBILITY
IMO 9864564
2,800 TEU 2021
8.2
C
1096 SEASPAN OCEANIA
IMO 9286009
8,468 TEU 2004
8.2
C
1100 MSC LISA
IMO 9281279
5,059 TEU 2004
8.2
C
1099 MSC MICHIGAN VII
IMO 9196864
6,420 TEU 2000
8.2
C
Page 22 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.