Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#902 of 2,221 container ships
CO₂ intensity
7.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.9)
-27% greener
C
2,267
vessels ranked
2.88
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.38
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
899 VALOR
IMO 9628154
8,800 TEU 2013
7.2
C
903 VENTA MAERSK
IMO 9775763
3,600 TEU 2018
7.2
C
902 ONE HANNOVER
IMO 9302138
8,212 TEU 2006
7.2
C
904 CHICAGO EXPRESS
IMO 9295268
8,235 TEU 2006
7.2
C
906 MSC UBERTY VIII
IMO 9337444
8,241 TEU 2008
7.3
C
905 CMA CGM TITUS
IMO 9450636
8,500 TEU 2010
7.3
C
908 MSC SAO PAULO V
IMO 9147071
4,688 TEU 1998
7.3
C
907 MSC REGULUS
IMO 9465291
13,100 TEU 2012
7.3
C
911 NYK RIGEL
IMO 9416977
4,888 TEU 2009
7.3
C
913 MSC BARBADOS
IMO 9289544
5,047 TEU 2005
7.3
C
910 LAURA MAERSK
IMO 9944546
2,100 TEU 2023
7.3
C
909 ACASTOS
IMO 9973004
2,800 TEU 2024
7.3
C
912 HYUNDAI COURAGE
IMO 9347542
8,600 TEU 2008
7.3
C
914 MSC DUBAI VII
IMO 9444285
6,310 TEU 2007
7.3
C
915 MSC ANTONELLA
IMO 9702273
8,800 TEU 2016
7.3
C
916 MSC ABY
IMO 9166778
7,226 TEU 1999
7.3
C
917 VALIANT
IMO 9628178
8,800 TEU 2013
7.3
C
918 PORTO GERMENO
IMO 9260902
5,928 TEU 2002
7.3
C
919 CMA CGM CHOPIN
IMO 9280603
5,762 TEU 2004
7.3
C
920 MSC ALTAMIRA
IMO 9619426
8,762 TEU 2012
7.3
C
922 MSC TOKYO
IMO 9318046
8,204 TEU 2006
7.4
C
921 MSC DORADO VIII
IMO 9301495
8,204 TEU 2006
7.4
C
923 MSC MAXINE
IMO 9720287
9,400 TEU 2015
7.4
C
924 SANTA TERESA
IMO 9430375
7,114 TEU 2011
7.4
C
927 ONE HUMBER
IMO 9302140
8,212 TEU 2006
7.4
C
926 SFL HAWAII
IMO 9679555
6,845 TEU 2014
7.4
C
925 MSC ESTHI
IMO 9304411
9,200 TEU 2006
7.4
C
929 JOLLY ORO
IMO 9450313
4,600 TEU 2009
7.4
C
928 HYUNDAI BRAVE
IMO 9346304
8,562 TEU 2008
7.4
C
931 CMA CGM EXCELLENCE
IMO 9948217
6,963 TEU 2023
7.4
C
930 PAGE
IMO 9215660
3,799 TEU 2001
7.4
C
932 MSC ANTIGUA
IMO 9619476
8,762 TEU 2013
7.4
C
934 CMA CGM MOZART
IMO 9280615
5,762 TEU 2004
7.4
C
935 MSC ELODIE
IMO 9704972
8,800 TEU 2015
7.4
C
933 MSC RENAISSANCE III
IMO 9358436
3,400 TEU 2006
7.4
C
936 MSC ABIDJAN
IMO 9618264
8,800 TEU 2013
7.4
C
939 CMA CGM RUNDALE
IMO 9961300
2,000 TEU 2024
7.4
C
938 MAERSK KENSINGTON
IMO 9333010
6,200 TEU 2007
7.4
C
937 CMA CGM ALCAZAR
IMO 9335197
5,089 TEU 2007
7.4
C
940 CMA CGM NINGBO
IMO 9295218
7,455 TEU 2005
7.4
C
941 CYPRESS
IMO 9461477
8,600 TEU 2011
7.4
C
942 CLEMENS SCHULTE
IMO 9665671
5,400 TEU 2014
7.4
C
945 CMA CGM ERMITAGE
IMO 9961295
2,000 TEU 2024
7.4
C
944 MSC ANS
IMO 9282261
4,900 TEU 2004
7.4
C
943 EVER LIVING
IMO 9629031
8,488 TEU 2013
7.4
C
948 MSC LORETTA
IMO 9230490
6,730 TEU 2002
7.4
C
947 ANAXAGORAS
IMO 9972983
2,800 TEU 2022
7.4
C
946 CMA CGM NIAGARA
IMO 9722675
9,894 TEU 2015
7.4
C
950 NANSHA EXPRESS
IMO 9778131
10,100 TEU 2018
7.5
C
949 GREENVILLE
IMO 9970014
7,200 TEU 2024
7.5
C
Page 19 of 45 — 2,221 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.