Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#943 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
15.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+37% higher
D

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 275 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 763 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 659 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 ONEGO EMS
IMO 9290074
10,683 2004
14.4
D
902 LUCITA
IMO 9338113
8,577 2005
14.4
D
903 ONEGO RIO
IMO 9258985
10,300 2003
14.4
D
904 VAASABORG
IMO 9196242
9,567 2000
14.4
D
905 SIDER VULCANO
IMO 9486312
8,108 2010
14.4
D
906 PASILA
IMO 9113018
13,367 1995
14.4
D
907 GOLDEN LION
IMO 9363974
6,315 2006
14.5
D
908 SPUIGRACHT
IMO 9202534
21,449 2001
14.5
D
909 SIDER BILBAO
IMO 9338151
14,184 2007
14.5
D
910 GITO
IMO 9428152
8,139 2007
14.5
D
911 KAROLIINA
IMO 9381380
8,379 2008
14.5
D
912 VEERSEBORG
IMO 9184653
8,667 1998
14.5
D
913 FWN SOLIDE
IMO 9321093
11,541 2006
14.5
D
914 BBC PERU
IMO 9549592
13,537 2012
14.5
D
915 GEMINI MAESTRO
IMO 9350006
7,448 2007
14.6
D
916 MARIETJE ANDREA
IMO 9361134
8,493 2009
14.6
D
917 FRISIAN OCTA
IMO 9526095
8,284 2010
14.6
D
918 DIAMANTGRACHT
IMO 9420813
17,966 2009
14.6
D
919 MAGPIE S
IMO 9188922
10,335 2007
14.6
D
920 GOLDEN ROSE
IMO 8801620
9,919 1989
14.6
D
921 FWN SEA
IMO 9721657
10,600 2016
14.6
D
922 MEHMET AGA
IMO 8914312
9,169 1989
14.7
D
923 TONY STARK
IMO 9046423
15,346 1993
14.7
D
924 SEA ENDURANCE
IMO 9516179
9,762 2012
14.7
D
925 WESERBORG
IMO 9505558
9,685 2011
14.7
D
926 SITHONIA II
IMO 9455571
8,790 2007
14.7
D
927 IRENA
IMO 9306380
8,153 2005
14.8
D
928 AK GLORIOUS
IMO 9362657
8,099 2006
14.8
D
929 TRENT NAVIGATOR
IMO 9631369
8,102 2013
14.8
D
930 TIMBER NAVIGATOR
IMO 9532824
8,289 2011
14.8
D
931 SEA EXPLORER
IMO 9516155
9,736 2012
14.8
D
932 FWN ATLANTIDE
IMO 9535620
10,872 2011
14.8
D
933 BORE WAVE
IMO 9892896
6,747 2022
14.8
D
934 SINAA
IMO 9081318
12,760 1994
14.9
D
935 NORDIC KYLIE
IMO 9357999
12,791 2005
14.9
D
936 FROLAND
IMO 9505584
9,692 2011
14.9
D
937 DOMINICA
IMO 9232204
13,022 2001
14.9
D
938 SEA PROSPECT
IMO 9516143
9,735 2012
14.9
D
939 MANASSA MIRA M
IMO 9081992
8,816 1997
14.9
D
940 EYUP
IMO 9306392
7,601 2005
15.0
D
941 BOHWA TSINGTAO
IMO 9623192
8,952 2011
15.0
D
942 ATALAYA TMA
IMO 9369291
7,353 2008
15.0
D
943 TANGO RIO
IMO 9205718
9,231 2000
15.0
D
944 FORTUNAGRACHT
IMO 9507609
12,094 2012
15.0
D
945 AYITA
IMO 9290048
10,384 2004
15.0
D
946 ALANIS
IMO 9468085
12,744 2010
15.1
D
947 NORJARL
IMO 9436264
7,365 2009
15.1
D
948 LILY-HA
IMO 8116972
12,352 1982
15.1
D
949 ZEKO Y
IMO 8027573
8,528 1981
15.1
D
950 MERWEBORG
IMO 9142552
9,200 1997
15.1
D
Page 19 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.