Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#945 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
15.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.91)
+37% higher
D

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.21
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 ONEGO EMS
IMO 9290074
10,683 2004
14.4
D
902 LUCITA
IMO 9338113
8,577 2005
14.4
D
903 VAASABORG
IMO 9196242
9,567 2000
14.4
D
904 SIDER VULCANO
IMO 9486312
8,108 2010
14.4
D
905 ONEGO RIO
IMO 9258985
10,300 2003
14.4
D
906 PASILA
IMO 9113018
13,367 1995
14.4
D
907 SPUIGRACHT
IMO 9202534
21,448 2001
14.5
D
908 GOLDEN LION
IMO 9363974
6,315 2006
14.5
D
909 SIDER BILBAO
IMO 9338151
14,184 2007
14.5
D
910 GITO
IMO 9428152
8,139 2007
14.5
D
911 KAROLIINA
IMO 9381380
8,379 2008
14.5
D
912 VEERSEBORG
IMO 9184653
8,667 1998
14.5
D
913 FWN SOLIDE
IMO 9321093
11,541 2006
14.5
D
914 BBC PERU
IMO 9549592
13,537 2012
14.5
D
915 GEMINI MAESTRO
IMO 9350006
7,448 2007
14.6
D
916 MARIETJE ANDREA
IMO 9361134
8,493 2009
14.6
D
917 FRISIAN OCTA
IMO 9526095
8,284 2010
14.6
D
918 DIAMANTGRACHT
IMO 9420813
17,966 2009
14.6
D
919 MAGPIE S
IMO 9188922
10,335 2007
14.6
D
920 MEHMET AGA
IMO 8914312
9,169 1989
14.7
D
921 TONY STARK
IMO 9046423
15,346 1993
14.7
D
922 SEA ENDURANCE
IMO 9516179
9,762 2012
14.7
D
923 WESERBORG
IMO 9505558
9,685 2011
14.7
D
924 FWN SEA
IMO 9721657
10,544 2016
14.7
D
925 SITHONIA II
IMO 9455571
8,790 2007
14.7
D
926 IRENA
IMO 9306380
8,153 2005
14.8
D
927 MANASSA MIRA M
IMO 9081992
8,929 1997
14.8
D
928 JUNO
IMO 9421154
8,265 2009
14.8
D
929 TIMBER NAVIGATOR
IMO 9532824
8,289 2011
14.8
D
930 TRENT NAVIGATOR
IMO 9631369
8,102 2013
14.8
D
931 SEA EXPLORER
IMO 9516155
9,736 2012
14.8
D
932 ARGO
IMO 9421128
8,265 2009
14.8
D
933 FWN ATLANTIDE
IMO 9535620
10,872 2011
14.8
D
934 BORE WAVE
IMO 9892896
6,747 2022
14.8
D
935 AZOV COAST
IMO 9387736
10,244 2007
14.8
D
936 AK GLORIOUS
IMO 9362657
8,057 2006
14.9
D
937 SINAA
IMO 9081318
12,760 1994
14.9
D
938 FROLAND
IMO 9505584
9,692 2011
14.9
D
939 NORDIC KYLIE
IMO 9357999
12,791 2005
14.9
D
940 DOMINICA
IMO 9232204
13,022 2001
14.9
D
941 KARSOY
IMO 9555618
11,259 2009
14.9
D
942 SEA PROSPECT
IMO 9516143
9,735 2012
14.9
D
943 ATALAYA TMA
IMO 9369291
7,353 2008
15.0
D
944 BOHWA TSINGTAO
IMO 9623192
8,952 2011
15.0
D
945 TANGO RIO
IMO 9205718
9,231 2000
15.0
D
946 FORTUNAGRACHT
IMO 9507609
12,094 2012
15.0
D
947 AYITA
IMO 9290048
10,384 2004
15.0
D
948 MOEZELBORG
IMO 9180839
9,732 1999
15.1
D
949 GOLDEN ROSE
IMO 8801620
9,594 1989
15.1
D
950 NORJARL
IMO 9436264
7,365 2009
15.1
D
Page 19 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.