Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,822 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.7 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-4% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 525 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

93
Q3
125
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
101
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,881 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,831 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,327 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,159 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,159 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,972 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,098
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,915–11,729M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,098 of 1,098 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1801 GHARAPURI ISLAND
IMO 9496147
57,978 2010
4.6
C
1802 BULK SPIRIT
IMO 9355501
52,950 2009
4.7
C
1803 AFRICAN QUEEN
IMO 9389930
55,000 2007
4.7
C
1804 DSI DRAMMEN
IMO 9775141
63,379 2016
4.7
C
1805 NORVIC SINGAPORE
IMO 9958341
39,738 2023
4.7
C
1806 ERGUVAN S
IMO 9603063
57,970 2011
4.7
C
1807 MAKEDONIKOS
IMO 9884605
61,087 2020
4.7
C
1808 LIGNUM GRID
IMO 9897975
42,446 2022
4.7
C
1809 FLAG GANGOS
IMO 9643908
56,526 2013
4.7
C
1810 ROSTRUM HAMBURG
IMO 9997268
40,012 2024
4.7
C
1811 JUST
IMO 9581370
57,551 2011
4.7
C
1812 PACIFIC TALISMAN
IMO 9712931
61,415 2016
4.7
C
1813 GREAT 61
IMO 9731365
61,580 2015
4.7
C
1814 TZAREVETZ
IMO 9968504
45,210 2024
4.7
C
1815 LIBRA
IMO 9494242
56,702 2010
4.7
C
1816 TIGER JILIN
IMO 9712216
63,415 2015
4.7
C
1817 CLIFTON BAY
IMO 9615743
58,628 2012
4.7
C
1818 KAVO PERDIKA
IMO 9584889
58,740 2013
4.7
C
1819 DENITA WAVE
IMO 9476458
93,201 2011
4.7
C
1820 SUMMIT SUCCESS
IMO 9310628
82,922 2005
4.7
C
1821 STAR STONINGTON
IMO 9575151
63,301 2012
4.7
C
1822 OKOLCHITSA
IMO 9841653
45,494 2020
4.7
C
1823 MARO MARO
IMO 9553725
61,143 2022
4.7
C
1824 NEW ISLAND
IMO 9258349
47,304 2002
4.7
C
1825 AGAPI S
IMO 9514822
62,145 2010
4.7
C
1826 KRONOS
IMO 9625815
57,399 2012
4.7
C
1827 WEST BAY
IMO 9278868
52,451 2004
4.7
C
1828 GREAT ZHOU
IMO 9766932
64,794 2017
4.7
C
1829 KN FOREST
IMO 9558268
58,037 2013
4.7
C
1830 HONG KONG EAGLE
IMO 9743590
63,472 2016
4.7
C
1831 KYTHIRA
IMO 9943243
37,400 2022
4.7
C
1832 HAATO
IMO 9589786
61,472 2011
4.7
C
1833 EQUINOX SEAS
IMO 9229697
52,009 2000
4.7
C
1834 KWAI KWAI
IMO 9780976
57,819 2016
4.7
C
1835 EVA ISTANBUL
IMO 9972440
40,552 2023
4.7
C
1836 HONY FUTURE
IMO 9583823
56,716 2012
4.7
C
1837 CETUS HUMPBACK
IMO 9670731
43,479 2015
4.7
C
1838 TOMINI KAIMAI
IMO 9709269
40,112 2013
4.7
C
1839 OZGUR AKSOY
IMO 9475040
58,410 2011
4.7
C
1840 FEDERAL PRESTIGE
IMO 9942196
42,701 2023
4.7
C
1841 SUNRISE JADE
IMO 9732955
63,244 2015
4.7
C
1842 ZHOUSHAN ISLAND
IMO 9610729
58,044 2010
4.7
C
1843 STELLA L
IMO 9500687
58,096 2012
4.7
C
1844 VICTORIAN TRADER
IMO 9945526
40,255 2023
4.7
C
1845 WADI ALYARMOUK
IMO 9460772
80,384 2010
4.7
C
1846 SPAR TAURUS
IMO 9299288
53,195 2005
4.7
C
1847 BONAS
IMO 9401972
51,687 2010
4.7
C
1848 SSI PRIDE
IMO 9250579
48,635 2002
4.7
C
1849 CLIPPER BARI-STAR
IMO 9792711
37,976 2023
4.7
C
1850 AMIS UNICORN
IMO 9882279
61,175 2020
4.7
C
Page 37 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.