Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#122 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
4.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
-65% greener
A

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 627 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 627 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 525 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

244
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (244 of 244 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
101 OCEANA SKY
IMO 9189938
50,655 1998
4.8
A
102 EAGLE ARROW
IMO 9529592
62,967 2011
4.8
A
103 EIKE OLDENDORFF
IMO 9794472
38,520 2017
4.8
A
104 GOLD OAK
IMO 9806342
37,732 2017
4.8
A
107 ESTRELLA
IMO 9477270
50,448 2012
4.8
A
106 HOSANGER
IMO 9081801
50,211 1995
4.8
A
105 CALYPSO.GR
IMO 9785134
37,865 2017
4.8
A
108 GREEN HELSINKI
IMO 9976068
68,022 2023
4.8
A
109 SOUND PEARL
IMO 9452907
52,125 2011
4.8
A
110 CHANNEL PEARL
IMO 9644550
50,633 2012
4.8
A
111 POLSTEAM OKRA
IMO 9984819
37,592 2024
4.9
A
112 POLAND PEARL
IMO 9731236
45,474 2015
4.9
A
113 COSCO SHIPPING HONOR
IMO 9881653
62,013 2020
4.9
A
115 JU FU
IMO 1072828
61,346 2025
4.9
A
114 AFRICAN PIPIT
IMO 9890903
37,636 2020
4.9
A
117 BERGE JUNGFRAU
IMO 9846304
37,683 2019
4.9
A
116 COSCO SHIPPING GRACE
IMO 9928865
61,613 2021
4.9
A
118 FERUSA R
IMO 9668556
37,429 2014
4.9
A
119 SAGA FALCON
IMO 9613848
55,596 2012
4.9
A
120 AFRICAN RAVEN
IMO 9700287
37,711 2014
4.9
A
121 TATUNG
IMO 9811921
37,685 2018
4.9
A
125 SAGA DISCOVERY
IMO 9317418
46,618 2006
4.9
A
124 OPTIMANA
IMO 9253856
57,599 2003
4.9
A
123 AMBER CONFIDENCE
IMO 9866550
37,720 2020
4.9
A
122 DEVBULK KAYA
IMO 9530711
40,527 2012
4.9
A
126 LOUISE
IMO 9470301
37,207 2012
4.9
A
127 TUJU ARROW
IMO 9443920
72,863 2010
4.9
A
128 GREEN ITAQUI
IMO 9976410
64,996 2024
4.9
A
129 CANADA PEARL
IMO 9659749
45,566 2014
5.0
A
131 SAGA VOYAGER
IMO 9233454
46,882 2001
5.0
A
130 SAGA ODYSSEY
IMO 9401788
46,500 2008
5.0
A
133 DRINA S
IMO 9635743
38,037 2012
5.0
A
132 POLSTEAM PILE
IMO 9971886
37,592 2024
5.0
A
134 VELVET
IMO 9782651
37,324 2021
5.0
A
135 BBC MARS
IMO 9947770
40,297 2022
5.0
A
136 PUFFIN ARROW
IMO 9566605
62,967 2011
5.0
A
138 STAR HARMONIA
IMO 9103130
46,604 1998
5.0
A
137 HOYANGER
IMO 9100073
50,194 1995
5.0
A
139 SAGA MONAL
IMO 9117739
56,801 1996
5.0
A
141 SAGA FUTURE
IMO 9613836
55,596 2012
5.1
A
140 STAR JAVA
IMO 9310513
44,692 2006
5.1
A
142 STAR KINN
IMO 9396141
49,850 2010
5.1
A
143 POLSTEAM KOPROWO
IMO 9971862
37,592 2024
5.1
A
144 STAR HANSA
IMO 9103128
46,428 1995
5.1
A
148 UNI BLOSSOM
IMO 9816567
37,634 2018
5.1
A
147 PANAMANA
IMO 9401805
58,022 2010
5.1
A
146 ADASUN
IMO 9747053
34,483 2017
5.1
A
145 POLSTEAM LEBSKO
IMO 9971874
37,574 2024
5.1
A
150 STAR LYSEFJORD
IMO 9616840
50,728 2014
5.1
A
149 POLSTEAM INSKO
IMO 9984833
37,630 2025
5.1
A
Page 3 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.