Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,739 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
5.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
+25% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2701 UBC HOUSTON
IMO 9697143
38,000 2015
5.8
D
2702 CHISE BULKER
IMO 9667722
33,355 2014
5.8
D
2703 QI XIAN LING
IMO 9656864
34,532 2012
5.8
D
2704 TULIP
IMO 9583835
56,716 2012
5.8
D
2705 ALAMO
IMO 9851335
39,258 2019
5.8
D
2706 PANOCEANIS
IMO 9460320
53,562 2007
5.8
D
2707 NAVI LYRA
IMO 9494747
33,271 2012
5.8
D
2708 BALTIC BAY
IMO 9761889
37,384 2018
5.8
D
2709 HOWES JOANNA
IMO 9442641
56,785 2009
5.8
D
2710 DRAWNO
IMO 9727508
39,092 2018
5.8
D
2711 CAPE GULL
IMO 9674804
36,320 2013
5.8
D
2712 LAGO DI COMO
IMO 9674361
37,500 2014
5.8
D
2713 FEDERAL BEAUFORT
IMO 9697818
34,564 2015
5.8
D
2714 RINIA
IMO 9594406
56,746 2012
5.8
D
2715 AFRICAN PIPER
IMO 9692777
34,365 2015
5.8
D
2716 LOLITA
IMO 1014979
40,420 2024
5.8
D
2717 ASALET
IMO 9574169
28,189 2010
5.8
D
2718 SHANGHAI BULKER
IMO 9599913
56,719 2012
5.8
D
2719 SUNFLOWER
IMO 9633020
28,364 2012
5.8
D
2720 ECO CERBERUS
IMO 9894624
37,875 2015
5.8
D
2721 THEODORA
IMO 9462445
53,569 2008
5.8
D
2722 ULTRA TATIO
IMO 9782986
37,927 2016
5.8
D
2723 EGE-M
IMO 9323895
56,676 2008
5.8
D
2724 BUNUN KALON
IMO 9768033
37,653 2018
5.9
D
2725 ERMOUPOLIS
IMO 9691503
28,339 2014
5.9
D
2726 JIAN GUO HAI
IMO 9751286
38,767 2016
5.9
D
2727 ULTRA OSORNO
IMO 9820996
37,981 2018
5.9
D
2728 S-BOUND
IMO 9610200
36,258 2012
5.9
D
2729 HARUKA
IMO 9589619
28,392 2011
5.9
D
2730 HARVESTER
IMO 9777711
37,600 2017
5.9
D
2731 DEMA
IMO 9416446
45,486 2011
5.9
D
2732 CRYSTAL LAND
IMO 9285146
38,981 2005
5.9
D
2733 LAGO DI FIASTRA
IMO 9471678
37,387 2013
5.9
D
2734 TS FLOWER
IMO 9719379
38,852 2017
5.9
D
2735 KASHKAR
IMO 9285029
38,890 2005
5.9
D
2736 AK MILANA
IMO 9251080
32,744 2002
5.9
D
2737 BIRGIT
IMO 9965655
39,988 2024
5.9
D
2738 GABRIELLA
IMO 9522908
36,892 2013
5.9
D
2739 V UNO
IMO 9698214
37,888 2015
5.9
D
2740 NEGMAR MEKO
IMO 9625451
38,657 2013
5.9
D
2741 NORDIC LUEBECK
IMO 9607459
34,236 2013
5.9
D
2742 FEDERAL SEVERN
IMO 9606821
37,169 2012
5.9
D
2743 CLIPPER MALLORCA
IMO 1047122
40,313 2025
5.9
D
2744 RIVER CONFIDENCE
IMO 9672222
34,393 2015
5.9
D
2745 ELIAS
IMO 9490777
57,970 2010
5.9
D
2746 ISTANBUL-M
IMO 9450818
36,000 2010
5.9
D
2747 HANDY INCLUSIVITY
IMO 9951800
37,770 2015
5.9
D
2748 ATLANTIC ISLAND
IMO 9628245
33,680 2012
5.9
D
2749 MABROKAH
IMO 9163489
45,572 1997
5.9
D
2750 LUCA
IMO 9166211
31,764 1998
5.9
D
Page 55 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.