Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,862 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
+32% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2851 AYMAR GRACE
IMO 9395252
53,406 2009
6.2
E
2852 KOSZALIN
IMO 9594236
37,885 2012
6.2
E
2853 PISTI
IMO 9456367
56,898 2011
6.2
E
2854 SZARE SZEREGI
IMO 9708057
39,071 2017
6.2
E
2855 IGUAZU
IMO 9725914
43,343 2017
6.2
E
2856 EIDER
IMO 9415143
29,860 2010
6.2
E
2857 TAI HONOR
IMO 9298519
52,292 2005
6.2
E
2858 LILA HOUSTON
IMO 9559676
32,581 2010
6.2
E
2859 NJ AIO
IMO 9267089
33,528 2004
6.2
E
2860 KARAMEL
IMO 9316921
35,287 2005
6.2
E
2861 KOSMAN
IMO 9630731
58,078 2013
6.2
E
2862 ORIENT PRESTIGE
IMO 9397248
31,883 2006
6.2
E
2863 IONIAN BAY
IMO 9747247
39,359 2016
6.2
E
2864 ORAWA
IMO 9386926
38,956 2009
6.2
E
2865 ULTRA HANDY
IMO 9643958
38,215 2013
6.2
E
2866 MALAMIR
IMO 9555151
57,000 2011
6.2
E
2867 GREAT BEAUTY
IMO 9792876
38,645 2018
6.2
E
2868 TAN BINH 357
IMO 9606534
29,118 2012
6.2
E
2869 REGINA S
IMO 9767041
36,193 2017
6.2
E
2870 ONE AND ONLY
IMO 9657868
40,576 2014
6.2
E
2871 TRANSTIME
IMO 9595929
56,726 2012
6.2
E
2872 BC ARMONIA
IMO 9706334
28,365 2014
6.2
E
2873 KOCIEWIE
IMO 9423798
38,981 2009
6.2
E
2874 BC AMER
IMO 9685619
38,486 2013
6.2
E
2875 WL LADOGA
IMO 9659799
37,681 2014
6.2
E
2876 FEDERAL KUSHIRO
IMO 9284702
32,762 2004
6.2
E
2877 MAVERICK
IMO 9762493
37,845 2018
6.2
E
2878 KURPIE
IMO 9423786
38,981 2009
6.2
E
2879 BOS COSTA
IMO 9310616
28,709 2007
6.2
E
2880 COPENHAGEN BULKER
IMO 9831490
39,511 2018
6.2
E
2881 APOGEE SPIRIT
IMO 9561875
29,638 2011
6.2
E
2882 ASL CRYSTAL
IMO 9778997
38,582 2019
6.2
E
2883 DSM ROSE
IMO 9303601
33,540 2004
6.2
E
2884 NEVA
IMO 9213753
31,824 2000
6.2
E
2885 WHITE WANDERER
IMO 9621869
37,869 2012
6.2
E
2886 TOKYO SPIRIT
IMO 9669627
35,550 2014
6.2
E
2887 TRUST STAR
IMO 9610236
36,232 2012
6.2
E
2888 CERES ONE
IMO 9698434
37,914 2017
6.2
E
2889 MUSTAFA BEY
IMO 9110339
27,369 1995
6.2
E
2890 ZEYNEP C
IMO 9232151
53,806 2003
6.2
E
2891 LILA SYDNEY
IMO 9660035
28,226 2013
6.2
E
2892 EFFICIENCY OL
IMO 9491666
37,130 2010
6.3
E
2893 DALARNA
IMO 9626120
35,958 2014
6.3
E
2894 YANGTZE ALPHA
IMO 9632791
56,692 2012
6.3
E
2895 LMZ EUROPA
IMO 9588562
56,771 2011
6.3
E
2896 BLUE SAPPHIRE
IMO 9877339
38,580 2020
6.3
E
2897 EGRET BULKER
IMO 9441295
57,809 2010
6.3
E
2898 COREOCEAN OL
IMO 9519212
28,358 2009
6.3
E
2899 NICHOLAS
IMO 9490765
58,018 2010
6.3
E
2900 DENSA FALCON
IMO 9649081
36,752 2011
6.3
E
Page 58 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.