Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Two Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships

Most Emission-Efficient Container Ships

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#968 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
8.0 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.39)
-23% greener
C
2,141
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/t·nm)
8.58
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
952 KALAHARI EXPRESS
IMO 9400095
6,300 TEU 2010
7.9
C
951 CHENNAI EXPRESS
IMO 9306158
6,539 TEU 2006
7.9
C
950 MSC MARTA
IMO 9295385
5,599 TEU 2005
7.9
C
954 CMA CGM BIANCA
IMO 9436367
8,533 TEU 2011
8.0
C
957 SANTA ISABEL
IMO 9444728
7,090 TEU 2007
8.0
C
956 MAERSK LEON
IMO 9526966
8,700 TEU 2012
8.0
C
955 MSC SARYA III
IMO 9241451
2,478 TEU 2003
8.0
C
958 YM EVOLUTION
IMO 9496460
4,662 TEU 2014
8.0
C
962 MSC MANZANILLO
IMO 9289960
5,060 TEU 2005
8.0
C
961 EVER LIVING
IMO 9629031
8,488 TEU 2013
8.0
C
960 ROTTERDAM
IMO 9398450
9,262 TEU 2010
8.0
C
959 GSL TRIPOLI
IMO 9437048
5,303 TEU 2009
8.0
C
963 C HAMBURG
IMO 9450375
8,600 TEU 2009
8.0
C
964 GJERTRUD MAERSK
IMO 9320233
6,600 TEU 2005
8.0
C
966 SANTA TERESA
IMO 9430375
7,114 TEU 2011
8.0
C
965 EVER LEGION
IMO 9604110
8,000 TEU 2010
8.0
C
967 EXPRESS ROME
IMO 9484936
10,114 TEU 2011
8.0
C
968 JOLLY VERDE
IMO 9320441
4,860 TEU 2007
8.0
C
970 ANTWERP
IMO 9398448
9,262 TEU 2009
8.0
C
969 LARS MAERSK
IMO 9294379
4,300 TEU 2004
8.0
C
972 SFL HAWAII
IMO 9679555
6,845 TEU 2014
8.0
C
971 ORCA I
IMO 9318113
5,041 TEU 2006
8.0
C
975 MAERSK DENVER
IMO 9332999
6,188 TEU 2007
8.0
C
974 MAERSK NUBA
IMO 9356115
2,478 TEU 2008
8.0
C
976 VENTO DI GRECALE
IMO 9985045
24,000 2024
8.0
C
973 ASTERIOS
IMO 9951135
1,800 TEU 2023
8.0
C
977 MSC HONG KONG V
IMO 9231810
4,800 TEU 2002
8.1
C
978 MSC ROSHNEY V
IMO 9337676
4,888 TEU 2007
8.1
C
979 OOCL SEOUL
IMO 9417244
8,063 TEU 2010
8.1
C
981 ARICA EXPRESS
IMO 9495765
4,600 TEU 2013
8.1
C
980 HYUNDAI TOKYO
IMO 9305673
6,800 TEU 2006
8.1
C
982 CONTI CHIVALRY
IMO 9293791
8,084 TEU 2006
8.1
C
983 CMA CGM COLUMBIA
IMO 9722663
9,894 TEU 2015
8.1
C
985 GSL TINOS
IMO 9437050
5,303 TEU 2010
8.1
C
984 VENTO DI MAESTRALE
IMO 9985021
24,457 2024
8.1
C
987 MSC AZOV
IMO 9605255
9,400 TEU 2014
8.1
C
986 MSC KALAMATA VII
IMO 9244946
6,246 TEU 2003
8.1
C
988 MSC PAMIRA III
IMO 9239903
2,490 TEU 2002
8.1
C
989 SEASPAN HAMBURG
IMO 9224300
4,253 TEU 2001
8.1
C
990 JOLLY BIANCO
IMO 9320427
4,860 TEU 2006
8.2
C
991 PUSAN C
IMO 9307229
9,572 TEU 2006
8.2
C
992 COSTA RICA EXPRESS
IMO 9641235
6,900 TEU 2013
8.2
C
993 MSC SUEZ
IMO 8918978
2,668 TEU 1993
8.2
C
996 MSC SHRISTI
IMO 9293442
4,738 TEU 2005
8.2
C
995 MSC ANAHITA
IMO 9302085
5,642 TEU 2006
8.2
C
994 MSC ORNELLA
IMO 9281267
4,900 TEU 2004
8.2
C
997 CMA CGM PUGET
IMO 9248124
4,367 TEU 2002
8.2
C
1000 VISTULA MAERSK
IMO 9775737
3,600 TEU 2018
8.2
C
999 HAWK I
IMO 9960564
5,300 TEU 2024
8.2
C
998 MSC HUSUM III
IMO 9326835
2,556 TEU 2006
8.2
C
Page 20 of 42 — 2,098 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.