Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#14 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
1.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-68% greener
A

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1 VL BRIGHT
IMO 9926740
319,202 2022
1.4
A
2 MARAN DANAE
IMO 9930791
320,916 2021
1.4
A
3 MARAN DIONE
IMO 9930806
320,916 2023
1.4
A
4 MARIA A. ANGELICOUSSIS
IMO 9930789
320,916 2021
1.4
A
5 YUAN YUE HU
IMO 9681211
308,079 2015
1.4
A
6 ANTONIS I. ANGELICOUSSIS
IMO 9930777
320,916 2021
1.4
A
7 SEAWAYS ENDEAVOR
IMO 9933573
299,365 2023
1.5
A
8 ADVANTAGE VISION
IMO 9933559
299,455 2023
1.6
A
9 EAGLE VELLORE
IMO 9933602
299,554 2023
1.6
A
10 SEAWAYS EXCELSIOR
IMO 9933597
299,468 2023
1.6
A
12 EAGLE VERACRUZ
IMO 9933626
299,525 2024
1.6
A
13 SEAWAYS ENTERPRISE
IMO 9933585
299,365 2023
1.6
A
11 YUAN RUI YANG
IMO 9843326
318,451 2022
1.6
A
14 NEW LAUREL
IMO 9603192
320,611 2014
1.6
A
16 EAGLE VENTURA
IMO 9933614
299,407 2023
1.6
A
15 OLYMPUS
IMO 9941661
301,850 2017
1.6
A
17 ADVANTAGE VERDICT
IMO 9933535
299,451 2022
1.7
A
18 FRONT EMPIRE
IMO 9788332
303,120 2018
1.7
A
20 ALTEREGO
IMO 9926697
299,847 2020
1.7
A
19 ADVANTAGE VICTORY
IMO 9933547
299,468 2022
1.7
A
21 FRONT BEAVER
IMO 9943748
300,008 2023
1.7
A
22 ADVANTAGE VITAL
IMO 9933561
299,590 2023
1.7
A
23 FRONT GANDER
IMO 9937098
300,018 2023
1.7
A
24 AGIOS NIKOLAS
IMO 9845506
363,186 2019
1.7
A
25 FRONT MORGAN
IMO 9877781
299,999 2021
1.7
A
26 NEW ODYSSEY
IMO 9708497
318,167 2016
1.7
A
28 AROSA
IMO 9784386
299,323 2017
1.7
A
27 NEW VOYAGE
IMO 9686364
313,733 2015
1.7
A
29 MARAN ARETE
IMO 9776547
319,398 2015
1.8
A
30 HELLAS PALIROS
IMO 9928657
299,999 2022
1.8
A
31 UNIVERSAL WINNER
IMO 9837602
299,981 2019
1.8
A
33 FRONT GAULA
IMO 9933652
299,982 2022
1.8
A
32 ESTEEM EXPLORER
IMO 9855484
312,135 2015
1.8
A
36 RED NOVA
IMO 9602643
319,778 2013
1.8
A
35 LEGIO X EQUESTRIS
IMO 9912256
299,937 2022
1.8
A
34 ANTIGONE
IMO 9709075
299,421 2015
1.8
A
38 DHT LEOPARD
IMO 9733961
299,629 2014
1.8
A
37 ANDRONIKOS
IMO 9830812
320,784 2017
1.8
A
40 NISSOS RHENIA
IMO 9845685
318,744 2019
1.8
A
39 GEM NO. 1
IMO 9735361
302,652 2013
1.8
A
41 WATER TIGER
IMO 9858034
299,995 2020
1.8
A
42 ASCONA
IMO 9828338
299,999 2019
1.8
A
43 HUNTER
IMO 9896414
299,940 2021
1.8
A
45 DHT LION
IMO 9722895
299,629 2013
1.8
A
44 DHT PEONY
IMO 9385843
320,013 2011
1.8
A
48 IOANNA
IMO 9387566
299,999 2008
1.8
A
46 NEW WEALTH
IMO 9706384
318,705 2017
1.8
A
47 NEW COMFORT
IMO 9706413
313,727 2016
1.8
A
50 TWIN CASTOR
IMO 9625956
321,039 2013
1.9
A
49 DHT PUMA
IMO 9728837
299,629 2014
1.9
A
Page 1 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.