Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#2,424 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
5.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
+13% higher
D

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2401 PANEMORFI
IMO 9660097
61,430 2013
5.3
D
2402 QING PING SHAN
IMO 9741504
63,474 2015
5.3
D
2403 MANGUSTA
IMO 9726853
33,393 2015
5.3
D
2404 XIN HAI TONG 59
IMO 9615315
56,642 2011
5.3
D
2405 KOTRAG
IMO 9503287
57,000 2012
5.3
D
2406 TIANJIN VENTURE
IMO 9457294
53,000 2009
5.3
D
2407 PACIFIC CONSTANT
IMO 9712888
61,450 2016
5.3
D
2408 ROMY
IMO 9890862
37,897 2020
5.3
D
2409 TRAMMO INDEPENDENT
IMO 9762895
38,800 2016
5.3
D
2410 FEDERAL BARENTS
IMO 9697820
34,564 2015
5.3
D
2411 KIRAN EUROPE
IMO 9491197
56,666 2010
5.3
D
2412 MOONRISE
IMO 9438054
53,800 2009
5.3
D
2413 BULKER BEE 30
IMO 9489986
34,935 2010
5.3
D
2414 AFRICAN MARGAUX
IMO 9889655
38,047 2020
5.3
D
2415 CHRYSANTHI S
IMO 9527441
80,269 2012
5.3
D
2416 STAR HELSINKI
IMO 9699270
63,605 2015
5.3
D
2417 PAN SPIRIT
IMO 9487433
56,891 2011
5.3
D
2418 PVT PERIDOT
IMO 9601170
57,300 2013
5.3
D
2419 FUAT BEY
IMO 9663817
35,437 2014
5.3
D
2420 QING QUAN SHAN
IMO 9741530
63,472 2016
5.3
D
2421 HU PO HAI
IMO 9738090
39,780 2015
5.3
D
2422 EBURY TRADER
IMO 9596727
56,603 2008
5.3
D
2423 SEA BRAVERY
IMO 9386407
58,722 2008
5.3
D
2424 FEDERAL CLYDE
IMO 9671072
34,564 2016
5.3
D
2425 NAVIOS CELESTIAL
IMO 9496226
58,063 2009
5.3
D
2426 XIN AN NING
IMO 9407859
55,256 2009
5.3
D
2427 INDIAN BULKER
IMO 9791925
37,717 2017
5.3
D
2428 ASTERAS
IMO 9610999
56,605 2013
5.3
D
2429 SCOTER
IMO 9902299
38,270 2021
5.3
D
2430 CARPE DIEM
IMO 1014967
40,455 2024
5.3
D
2431 AYANA STAR
IMO 9291212
28,449 2004
5.3
D
2432 KIRAN AMERICA
IMO 9491264
56,569 2010
5.3
D
2433 FEDERAL COLUMBIA
IMO 9671084
34,564 2016
5.3
D
2434 CHANG SHUN II
IMO 9546071
57,000 2009
5.3
D
2435 OCEANIC PRAISE
IMO 9687150
37,431 2015
5.3
D
2436 KNOSSOS
IMO 9567544
56,762 2011
5.3
D
2437 IASOS
IMO 9233882
52,817 2001
5.3
D
2438 POLES
IMO 9254989
50,326 2002
5.3
D
2439 THOR BREEZE
IMO 9474802
53,572 2013
5.4
D
2440 QUEEN
IMO 9425928
58,096 2010
5.4
D
2441 ECUADOR L
IMO 9426192
57,937 2011
5.4
D
2442 SEA DHYANA
IMO 9626912
56,521 2012
5.4
D
2443 COLUMBIA RIVER
IMO 9331907
55,922 2006
5.4
D
2444 MARYAM
IMO 9615676
56,798 2011
5.4
D
2445 CHARISMA
IMO 9409132
55,667 2010
5.4
D
2446 SHEILA
IMO 9730244
58,607 2016
5.4
D
2447 SHUN FU XING
IMO 9213363
75,172 2001
5.4
D
2448 ALKYONIS
IMO 9709465
37,418 2016
5.4
D
2449 SIDER MIRAMARE
IMO 9865233
39,172 2019
5.4
D
2450 ARUNA CIHAN
IMO 9543756
57,411 2011
5.4
D
Page 49 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.