Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,174 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
-17% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1149 CHLOE
IMO 9749910
81,629 2014
3.9
B
1148 GENOA
IMO 9805659
60,396 2017
3.9
B
1147 SSI VIGILANT
IMO 9918743
63,861 2022
3.9
B
1155 TARIEL
IMO 9231303
76,623 2001
3.9
B
1154 MINOAN GLORY
IMO 9364447
74,748 2006
3.9
B
1159 CL ZHANJIANG
IMO 9977359
64,765 2024
3.9
B
1161 SUDESTADA
IMO 9426087
93,274 2010
3.9
B
1158 MH ARPEGGIO
IMO 9916965
61,236 2022
3.9
B
1163 SUMMER SKY
IMO 9790830
63,415 2017
3.9
B
1162 OCEAN GLSR
IMO 9529516
56,108 2014
3.9
B
1157 FEDERAL PASSION
IMO 9926049
42,692 2022
3.9
B
1156 TOKYO PIONEER
IMO 9856294
63,686 2020
3.9
B
1160 GCL GREECE
IMO 9906477
82,299 2021
3.9
B
1164 STAR SINGAPORE
IMO 9788100
63,386 2017
3.9
B
1165 EQUINOX MELIDA
IMO 9914503
61,211 2020
3.9
B
1168 GREAT ZHOU
IMO 9766932
64,794 2017
3.9
B
1167 STAR HAMBURG
IMO 9698587
63,800 2014
3.9
B
1166 STAR COPENHAGEN
IMO 9699359
63,495 2015
3.9
B
1172 PENELOPE I
IMO 9762601
81,835 2017
3.9
B
1171 AXION ESTI
IMO 1025928
63,928 2025
3.9
B
1173 RG ATHENA
IMO 9314648
82,282 2007
3.9
B
1170 KARO T
IMO 9942108
63,520 2023
3.9
B
1169 GUO YUAN 32
IMO 9591480
75,806 2013
3.9
B
1176 STAR MONICA
IMO 9715842
60,935 2015
3.9
B
1175 THEMIS
IMO 9594913
81,963 2012
3.9
B
1174 BELMONTE
IMO 9687124
81,261 2014
3.9
B
1184 MEDI ZUOZ
IMO 9789910
61,175 2013
3.9
B
1186 ARMERIA
IMO 1041245
64,670 2025
3.9
B
1178 PROPEL GRACE
IMO 9605023
61,439 2012
3.9
B
1187 PEACEFUL SEAS
IMO 9707584
63,350 2014
3.9
B
1177 CHAILEASE BRIGHT
IMO 9642485
76,249 2012
3.9
B
1183 STEFANOS
IMO 9719575
81,237 2017
3.9
B
1182 PAN HARVEST
IMO 9699335
63,577 2015
3.9
B
1181 ASTARTE
IMO 9600645
81,513 2013
3.9
B
1180 ALLIS SERENE
IMO 9425851
58,098 2011
3.9
B
1179 DESERT FAITH
IMO 9942067
63,675 2023
3.9
B
1185 KMAX LEADER
IMO 9477414
91,827 2010
3.9
B
1200 ASTREA
IMO 9705366
81,838 2015
3.9
B
1198 LOWLANDS ISLAND
IMO 9984534
63,739 2023
3.9
B
1197 NEARCHOS
IMO 9852030
61,148 2019
3.9
B
1196 PHOENIX
IMO 9609160
81,569 2012
3.9
B
1195 LEMESSOS WIND
IMO 9516399
76,523 2009
3.9
B
1194 MARKET PORTER
IMO 9852913
61,208 2015
3.9
B
1193 HONG YUAN
IMO 9500883
76,573 2009
3.9
B
1192 APJ PRIYA 2
IMO 9361196
82,298 2006
3.9
B
1191 SIKINOS
IMO 9967639
63,615 2023
3.9
B
1190 ANDERMATT
IMO 9738791
77,113 2015
3.9
B
1199 ADS ARENDAL
IMO 9652507
82,908 2013
3.9
B
1189 BELTANGO
IMO 9874284
64,061 2020
3.9
B
1188 DART TRADER
IMO 9566813
79,467 2006
3.9
B
Page 24 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.