Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#405 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-34% greener
A

CII band distribution

1,300 at D/E
A 1,145B 955C 1,317D 765E 535

4,717 rated vessels · 529 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

93
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
75
'27 Q2
57
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
88
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,788 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,673 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 2,673 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,100
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,980–11,883M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,100 of 1,100 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
404 YM NAVIGATOR
IMO 9518191
81,955 2014
3.2
A
403 COTINGA
IMO 9786011
82,061 2019
3.2
A
402 SYLVANER
IMO 9947275
82,412 2023
3.2
A
401 EOLOS G
IMO 9623738
81,817 2014
3.2
A
409 MEDI GINEVRA
IMO 9815939
87,091 2018
3.2
A
408 NORD AQUARIUS
IMO 9941398
82,375 2022
3.2
A
410 PM HAYABUSA II
IMO 9926477
63,883 2022
3.2
A
407 STAR NICOLE
IMO 9673783
81,120 2013
3.2
A
411 MONDIAL SUN
IMO 9859296
82,035 2019
3.2
A
406 GENEVAN TRADER
IMO 9846122
82,226 2020
3.2
A
405 POPEYE
IMO 9599078
98,730 2013
3.2
A
414 GALAXY GLOBE
IMO 9723629
81,167 2015
3.2
A
413 TZOUMAZ
IMO 9694921
89,772 2015
3.2
A
412 CYMONA ENERGY
IMO 9638173
74,867 2012
3.2
A
418 TATRY
IMO 9582960
82,138 2013
3.2
A
421 PACIFIC SOUTH
IMO 9474967
176,000 2012
3.2
A
417 STARDUST
IMO 9591959
78,072 2012
3.2
A
419 TRITON CENTURY
IMO 9805702
82,079 2018
3.2
A
416 GREAT BLOSSOM
IMO 9986910
82,781 2024
3.2
A
415 SENTOSA CHALLENGER
IMO 9866586
81,601 2020
3.2
A
420 ORIENT PEONY
IMO 9946764
82,195 2022
3.2
A
424 RICH AZURE
IMO 9950648
64,452 2023
3.2
A
423 CRIMSON EMPRESS
IMO 9485021
82,250 2014
3.2
A
425 GLOBAL FANFARE
IMO 9969027
63,734 2023
3.2
A
422 CARLTON TRADER
IMO 9937567
82,237 2023
3.2
A
433 JOSCO SHENGZHOU
IMO 9934175
64,250 2022
3.2
A
432 NORDIC NULUUJAAK
IMO 9884966
95,758 2021
3.2
A
431 SASEBO GLORY
IMO 9740823
85,020 2016
3.2
A
430 KAVOKAMILI
IMO 9840661
85,141 2020
3.2
A
429 JEWEL
IMO 9567037
175,784 2006
3.2
A
428 SCARLET ROSELLA
IMO 9609627
82,235 2015
3.2
A
427 MARAN VOYAGER
IMO 9458688
179,718 2010
3.2
A
426 BENTLEY
IMO 9847891
80,856 2019
3.2
A
435 DONNA ALEXANDRA
IMO 9950595
82,183 2023
3.2
A
437 ATLANTIC SAMURAI
IMO 9783980
81,725 2019
3.2
A
434 NORDIC QINNGUA
IMO 9884978
95,709 2021
3.2
A
441 ANDERMATT
IMO 9738791
77,113 2015
3.2
A
440 KEY JOURNEY
IMO 9433640
80,591 2012
3.2
A
438 XING YANG HAI
IMO 9949297
85,016 2022
3.2
A
439 IONIC KALLIRHOE
IMO 9796195
84,769 2020
3.2
A
436 LIEFDE
IMO 9961934
82,725 2024
3.2
A
450 ERMIS
IMO 9723643
81,175 2016
3.2
A
449 KYPROS LAND
IMO 9667368
77,060 2014
3.2
A
448 FORTE SAO MARCELO
IMO 9939072
121,669 2021
3.2
A
447 CARDIFF
IMO 9966568
90,014 2024
3.2
A
446 SWANSEA
IMO 9966570
90,023 2021
3.2
A
445 GLORY CUIABA
IMO 9311189
75,886 2008
3.2
A
444 YANGZE 21
IMO 9602368
82,122 2012
3.2
A
443 CL TAIZHOU
IMO 9747314
81,119 2019
3.2
A
442 AM JYOTI
IMO 9880233
82,603 2020
3.2
A
Page 9 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.