Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#3,004 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.71)
+39% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3001 MAPLE AMBITION
IMO 9760354
35,513 2015
6.6
E
3002 SEAHOPE
IMO 9598294
32,922 2012
6.6
E
3003 STRATEGIC SAVANNAH
IMO 9686338
35,542 2013
6.6
E
3004 AUTUMN SEA
IMO 9639775
35,244 2013
6.6
E
3005 ORCINUS
IMO 9467952
34,094 2010
6.6
E
3006 BLUEBILL
IMO 9263306
37,332 2004
6.6
E
3007 AURORA TRADER
IMO 9595967
37,019 2012
6.6
E
3008 BARNACLE
IMO 9409742
30,803 2009
6.6
E
3009 MEL GRACE
IMO 9590955
38,225 2011
6.6
E
3010 ALANDA STAR
IMO 9189677
31,828 1999
6.6
E
3011 CETUS OMURA
IMO 9670781
43,532 2016
6.6
E
3012 HELENA G
IMO 9358383
37,251 2007
6.6
E
3013 ABK LEGEND
IMO 9238674
30,039 2002
6.6
E
3014 JAGUAR
IMO 9464948
36,839 2011
6.6
E
3015 STRATEGIC EXPLORER
IMO 9723708
39,880 2015
6.6
E
3016 STRATEGIC FORTITUDE
IMO 9753387
37,829 2016
6.6
E
3017 PUCK
IMO 9594250
37,930 2012
6.6
E
3018 LONDON BAY
IMO 9286944
29,727 2004
6.6
E
3019 GOLDEN CITRUS
IMO 9663740
39,232 2015
6.6
E
3020 REDHEAD
IMO 9413901
29,724 2010
6.6
E
3021 OSLEEN
IMO 9278739
33,658 2004
6.6
E
3022 AGIA DYNAMI
IMO 9502764
34,292 2010
6.6
E
3023 LADY VENEZIA
IMO 9641821
28,207 2013
6.6
E
3024 ROZTOCZE
IMO 9346835
38,980 2008
6.6
E
3025 AMALIA
IMO 9588354
35,063 2011
6.7
E
3026 BRAVE M
IMO 9153496
28,404 1998
6.7
E
3027 YARA J
IMO 9118147
34,169 1997
6.7
E
3028 BABITONGA BAY
IMO 9663776
39,202 2015
6.7
E
3029 MAAS CONFIDENCE
IMO 9713210
34,914 2016
6.7
E
3030 ACTION TRADER
IMO 9808663
39,481 2017
6.7
E
3031 K SUKRET
IMO 9571442
33,814 2014
6.7
E
3032 G PUTUO
IMO 9491238
56,780 2011
6.7
E
3033 YASA KYOTO
IMO 9948267
37,396 2023
6.7
E
3034 PHOENICIAN-M
IMO 9450806
37,973 2010
6.7
E
3035 WEST HARMONY
IMO 9665700
35,534 2012
6.7
E
3036 PODLASIE
IMO 9346811
38,981 2008
6.7
E
3037 VIVA COSMOS
IMO 9251327
52,089 2003
6.7
E
3038 SHIMANAMI STAR
IMO 9377717
28,447 2006
6.7
E
3039 BELASITZA
IMO 9498262
30,696 2011
6.7
E
3040 HANDY STRANGER
IMO 9643453
34,753 2014
6.7
E
3041 TAN BINH 345
IMO 9491680
37,218 2011
6.7
E
3042 DS MANATEE
IMO 9255189
27,129 2002
6.7
E
3043 SERENITY
IMO 9606120
52,000 2016
6.7
E
3044 ARDENNES
IMO 9646699
36,062 2013
6.7
E
3045 GOLDEN ARSENAL
IMO 9493212
28,221 2011
6.7
E
3046 CATIVERA
IMO 9172105
24,154 1998
6.7
E
3047 ALLEGRA
IMO 9519169
35,118 2011
6.7
E
3048 EXPLORER AMERICA
IMO 9566576
61,684 2011
6.7
E
3049 KEN BREEZE
IMO 9636383
37,148 2012
6.7
E
3050 LILA TOCHIGI
IMO 9683116
28,354 2014
6.7
E
Page 61 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.