Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#2,981 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+35% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2951 CLIPPER SPEY
IMO 9587219
33,985 2011
6.5
E
2952 ALLEGRA
IMO 9519169
35,118 2008
6.5
E
2953 UBC THESSALONIKI
IMO 9718454
37,567 2015
6.5
E
2954 NEW LIBERTY
IMO 9221645
28,471 2002
6.5
E
2955 AQUA REGIA
IMO 9199842
29,952 1999
6.5
E
2956 WESTERN MAPLE
IMO 9587154
32,493 2010
6.5
E
2957 DARYA SATI
IMO 9752424
64,000 2014
6.5
E
2958 DSM NORWICH
IMO 9274551
32,754 2004
6.5
E
2959 ROZANA
IMO 9198381
47,336 2000
6.5
E
2960 AG VALOR
IMO 9312327
28,510 2004
6.5
E
2961 INASE
IMO 9445148
28,429 2008
6.5
E
2962 AP DRZIC
IMO 9331684
53,414 2009
6.5
E
2963 VEGA CAROLINE
IMO 9587166
32,491 2011
6.5
E
2964 LAGAVULIN
IMO 9396555
16,925 2007
6.5
E
2965 SEA FAITH
IMO 9655420
33,343 2014
6.5
E
2966 NYMPHI
IMO 9615030
28,214 2012
6.5
E
2967 SIRIUS
IMO 9541887
34,537 2011
6.5
E
2968 FOUR NABUCCO
IMO 9450650
34,403 2010
6.5
E
2969 BELASITZA
IMO 9498262
30,696 2011
6.5
E
2970 CHARILAOS S
IMO 9493925
75,039 2011
6.5
E
2971 SATURNIA
IMO 9725380
38,947 2015
6.6
E
2972 IVORY GULL
IMO 9475715
32,929 2009
6.6
E
2973 MALLIKA NAREE
IMO 9354739
30,195 2008
6.6
E
2974 AT 27
IMO 9136539
26,551 1997
6.6
E
2975 JULIETTA D
IMO 9590618
37,202 2013
6.6
E
2976 NOTA APP
IMO 9249271
53,098 2003
6.6
E
2977 SEALION
IMO 9598282
32,860 2012
6.6
E
2978 MAZOWSZE
IMO 9386914
38,065 2009
6.6
E
2979 JASMUND
IMO 9696840
38,868 2015
6.6
E
2980 JAOHAR UK
IMO 9302463
27,112 2005
6.6
E
2981 FEDERAL YELLOWSTONE
IMO 9609653
37,153 2013
6.6
E
2982 LILA NOLA
IMO 9621041
35,501 2012
6.6
E
2983 MARYAM D
IMO 9740445
36,176 2016
6.6
E
2984 ARKLOW SPIRIT
IMO 9649536
34,905 2013
6.6
E
2985 URSA MINOR
IMO 9711767
40,097 2013
6.6
E
2986 LEFKES
IMO 9658783
33,398 2014
6.6
E
2987 STRATEGIC SYNERGY
IMO 9648087
40,000 2011
6.6
E
2988 CAPETAN VASSILIS II
IMO 9580118
36,429 2010
6.6
E
2989 SIGMA PIONEER
IMO 9543249
31,800 2011
6.6
E
2990 CHIOS VICTORY
IMO 9680243
36,612 2015
6.6
E
2991 ACACIA
IMO 9597642
33,677 2008
6.6
E
2992 OSLEEN
IMO 9278739
33,658 2004
6.6
E
2993 NIKATOR
IMO 9544372
28,336 2009
6.6
E
2994 SERENITY
IMO 9544762
36,599 2011
6.6
E
2995 AP SVETI VLAHO
IMO 9331696
53,529 2009
6.6
E
2996 IRYDA
IMO 9180384
34,946 1999
6.6
E
2997 PUCK
IMO 9594250
37,930 2012
6.6
E
2998 TRANSMERIDIAN
IMO 9577757
35,853 2011
6.6
E
2999 RESOLUTE BAY
IMO 9626314
36,798 2012
6.6
E
3000 PORT ALICE
IMO 9311402
33,505 2005
6.6
E
Page 60 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.