Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#566 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-35% greener
B

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
551 RAVA
IMO 9796743
114,385 2017
3.4
B
553 AL BATEEN
IMO 9828376
114,637 2020
3.4
B
552 NEWBURY
IMO 9920497
112,095 2022
3.4
B
557 TORM KIARA
IMO 9701554
114,270 2015
3.4
B
556 ITHAKI DF
IMO 9953494
114,598 2024
3.4
B
555 NEW AMORGOS
IMO 9370836
107,510 2005
3.4
B
554 ELANDRA SWIFT
IMO 9945306
109,999 2024
3.4
B
558 SEA VOYAGER
IMO 9408310
107,506 2006
3.4
B
562 NOLDE
IMO 9787924
115,024 2015
3.4
B
561 SONANGOL NAMIBE
IMO 9325049
158,425 2004
3.4
B
560 FRONT FUSION
IMO 9887803
109,899 2021
3.4
B
559 AGIOS GERASIMOS
IMO 9693056
109,999 2013
3.4
B
563 SEAWAYS COLORADO
IMO 9594767
158,614 2010
3.4
B
565 PROMETHEUS LIGHT
IMO 9801976
114,601 2019
3.4
B
564 OCEAN BLUE
IMO 9955997
113,385 2021
3.4
B
571 ARDAS I
IMO 9930624
115,335 2023
3.4
B
570 OSLO TS
IMO 9737383
112,949 2017
3.4
B
569 SEAGALAXY
IMO 9847231
114,426 2015
3.4
B
568 CAP FELIX
IMO 9380738
158,765 2008
3.4
B
567 RELIABLE WARRIOR
IMO 9753557
159,058 2014
3.4
B
566 ON PRECIOUS
IMO 9893216
114,623 2021
3.4
B
572 STI SLOANE
IMO 9690808
114,000 2013
3.4
B
576 ANTARCTIC
IMO 9315185
163,216 2007
3.4
B
578 PISSIOTIS
IMO 9509023
149,998 2006
3.4
B
574 STI MADISON
IMO 9688831
109,999 2013
3.4
B
573 FLAVIN
IMO 9787912
115,125 2015
3.4
B
577 TATAKI
IMO 9410210
162,187 2006
3.4
B
575 FRONT ALTAIR
IMO 9745902
109,894 2014
3.4
B
580 HAFNIA TRITON
IMO 9800336
109,990 2019
3.4
B
579 METRO AEGEAN
IMO 9973640
114,934 2024
3.4
B
581 DELTA SUPREME
IMO 9585895
159,031 2012
3.4
B
582 RIVERA
IMO 9777943
113,000 2015
3.4
B
583 YAMATO SPIRIT
IMO 9414503
107,617 2008
3.4
B
587 STI ROSE
IMO 9696682
109,999 2015
3.4
B
586 MARAN PYTHIA
IMO 9402902
158,266 2009
3.4
B
585 IONIC ARTEMIS
IMO 9426441
107,605 2009
3.4
B
584 ESTRELLA
IMO 9696761
106,282 2014
3.4
B
589 DELTA HARMONY
IMO 9408463
157,410 2009
3.4
B
592 VST ELECTRA
IMO 9784611
109,986 2017
3.4
B
594 LOVELY LADY
IMO 9960978
115,322 2023
3.4
B
591 MARITIME GLORY
IMO 9863429
114,122 2021
3.4
B
595 PARTHENON TS
IMO 9724348
113,554 2016
3.4
B
590 PROMETHEUS ENERGY
IMO 9801988
114,459 2019
3.4
B
588 SEASCOUT
IMO 9997957
113,814 2025
3.4
B
593 YUAN TANG WAN
IMO 9846005
113,684 2020
3.4
B
600 PHAETHON
IMO 9412098
158,267 2009
3.4
B
599 CAPTAIN JOHN
IMO 9692832
113,876 2013
3.4
B
598 FRONT CASTOR
IMO 9780251
111,088 2015
3.4
B
597 MARAN PLATO
IMO 9399507
158,267 2009
3.4
B
596 GEMINI SUN
IMO 9343340
115,577 2008
3.4
B
Page 12 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.