Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#503 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
9.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
-15% greener
C

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 275 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

46
Q4
56
'27 Q1
56
'27 Q2
36
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
56
'28 Q1
44
'28 Q2
34
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,462 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 772 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 772 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 668 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 566 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 97 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
501 ATLANTIC SPIRIT II
IMO 9594509
33,200 2012
9.3
C
502 BASEL ATHENA
IMO 9164809
20,730 1999
9.3
C
503 FISHER
IMO 9177791
12,974 1999
9.3
C
504 TRANSEUROPE
IMO 9586588
25,000 2010
9.3
C
505 FIVELBORG
IMO 9419307
14,575 2010
9.4
C
506 CS FLOURISH
IMO 9438365
34,022 2010
9.4
C
507 BLAIR MCKEIL
IMO 9546045
14,906 2010
9.4
C
508 ARKLOW WAVE
IMO 9818931
16,861 2018
9.5
C
509 XING FU SONG
IMO 9608958
27,292 2012
9.5
C
510 BC RAEDA
IMO 9487598
24,959 2011
9.5
C
511 ARKLOW WILLOW
IMO 9818955
16,861 2019
9.5
C
512 PATAGONMAN
IMO 9521851
18,858 2012
9.6
C
513 AAL SINGAPORE
IMO 9498365
32,134 2011
9.6
C
514 APHRODITE I
IMO 9372468
10,353 2006
9.6
C
515 NORDIC MALMOE
IMO 9602679
35,843 2012
9.6
C
516 NORD LOTUS
IMO 9742390
16,963 2015
9.6
C
517 BULKER BEE 10
IMO 9507087
13,784 2010
9.6
C
518 DA CUI YUN
IMO 9451329
28,341 2011
9.6
C
519 EKMEN ROYAL
IMO 9165865
10,334 2005
9.6
C
521 MU DAN SONG
IMO 9608831
27,411 2012
9.6
C
520 TOI CHALLENGER
IMO 9151515
21,146 1997
9.6
C
522 SAPIENZA
IMO 9413066
18,917 2009
9.7
C
523 ADAMAR
IMO 9515280
17,660 2009
9.7
C
524 COMPADRE
IMO 9506100
23,003 2009
9.7
C
525 YM SAMSUN
IMO 9584982
8,716 2011
9.7
C
526 TIBERBORG
IMO 9546473
21,301 2013
9.7
C
528 KING JOY
IMO 9537472
16,807 2009
9.7
C
527 ROYAL II
IMO 9355109
13,721 2007
9.7
C
529 HOPTERIX
IMO 9645841
8,813 2012
9.8
C
530 MATTEO BR
IMO 9556844
25,000 2010
9.8
C
531 K.DADAYLI
IMO 9513191
9,293 2009
9.8
C
532 HANA H
IMO 9143855
8,104 1998
9.8
C
533 BAHRI DIRIYAH
IMO 9498482
32,241 2014
9.8
C
534 FWN ATLANTIC
IMO 9931472
12,575 2023
9.8
C
535 GOLDEN BIRD
IMO 8517580
12,342 1986
9.9
C
536 SOPHIA I
IMO 9546007
12,952 2011
9.9
C
538 DANILA BAGROV
IMO 9458420
28,309 2012
9.9
C
537 FRASERBORG
IMO 9419319
14,583 2011
9.9
C
539 FENG HUANG SONG
IMO 9416757
27,300 2009
9.9
C
540 TAAGBORG
IMO 9546461
21,338 2013
10.0
C
541 FLEVOBORG
IMO 9419292
14,603 2010
10.0
C
542 CONDOR BILBAO
IMO 9473250
17,287 2012
10.0
C
543 SIYA
IMO 9442108
10,475 2007
10.1
C
545 ANNETTA
IMO 9396543
11,732 2007
10.1
C
544 PEACE
IMO 9553983
16,817 2012
10.1
C
548 MIKAWA
IMO 9354208
14,078 2006
10.1
C
547 ADAROSE
IMO 9392107
12,497 2009
10.1
C
546 ADAPEARL
IMO 9539432
12,427 2011
10.1
C
549 SIENNA
IMO 9353022
8,163 2005
10.1
C
550 ARIANNA
IMO 9406702
11,731 2007
10.1
C
Page 11 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.