Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,062 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-9% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1051 ARK
IMO 9313486
105,804 2008
4.6
C
1052 DIYYINAH - I
IMO 9487251
74,954 2011
4.6
C
1053 BOTAFOGO
IMO 9395329
106,892 2006
4.6
C
1054 SUNNY APATITE
IMO 9721891
49,999 2016
4.6
C
1055 MINERVA LISA
IMO 9276597
103,755 2004
4.6
C
1056 NORD MIRAI
IMO 9890939
49,995 2021
4.6
C
1057 TORM HELLERUP
IMO 9798002
114,951 2018
4.6
C
1058 ADVANTAGE SUN
IMO 9513141
156,644 2012
4.6
C
1059 ADVANTAGE SUMMER
IMO 9419890
156,527 2010
4.6
C
1060 TORM EMMA
IMO 9592680
75,022 2012
4.6
C
1061 TORM INTEGRITY
IMO 9602710
73,811 2013
4.6
C
1062 NISSOS KOUFONISSI
IMO 9895214
157,447 2021
4.6
C
1063 PGC MARINA
IMO 9299563
72,807 2005
4.6
C
1064 KMARIN RIGOUR
IMO 9683049
109,475 2016
4.6
C
1065 STAVANGER POSEIDON
IMO 9839105
49,999 2020
4.6
C
1066 MINERVA PISCES
IMO 9410179
105,475 2006
4.6
C
1067 SOLAR MADELEIN
IMO 9882413
49,990 2020
4.6
C
1068 EMERALD SPIRIT
IMO 9422005
109,144 2006
4.7
C
1069 LILLESAND
IMO 9336397
105,786 2007
4.7
C
1070 TORM TIMOTHY
IMO 9726487
49,757 2015
4.7
C
1071 ECLIPSE I
IMO 9301536
158,933 2006
4.7
C
1072 TORM SUPREME
IMO 9797735
49,999 2015
4.7
C
1073 HAFNIA NANJING
IMO 9863235
74,999 2021
4.7
C
1074 TORM EMILIE
IMO 9592692
75,013 2013
4.7
C
1075 SUEZ ICE SUPREME
IMO 9296418
146,356 2007
4.7
C
1076 ZENOVIA LADY
IMO 9389277
109,999 2009
4.7
D
1077 NORDTOKYO
IMO 9859208
50,192 2020
4.7
D
1078 NAVIG8 MONTIEL
IMO 9482861
75,571 2012
4.7
D
1079 OLYMPIC SKY
IMO 9489297
104,768 2008
4.7
D
1080 SEASENATOR
IMO 9304368
105,715 2003
4.7
D
1081 NORVIC MONIA
IMO 9404936
105,348 2008
4.7
D
1082 AFRAPEARL II
IMO 9437672
115,897 2010
4.7
D
1083 MARE NOSTRUM
IMO 9346885
110,295 2009
4.7
D
1084 RAINBOW SPIRIT
IMO 9837171
129,734 2020
4.7
D
1085 TWERK
IMO 9379961
74,268 2008
4.7
D
1086 AEGEAN HARMONY
IMO 9338917
115,824 2007
4.7
D
1087 BAYOU SUN
IMO 9911537
49,999 2022
4.7
D
1088 PS STARS
IMO 9930519
49,999 2022
4.8
D
1089 JAG LAXMI
IMO 9568196
105,525 2012
4.8
D
1090 CHEMTRANS POLARIS
IMO 9308998
72,291 2005
4.8
D
1091 TORM EVA
IMO 9577109
74,552 2011
4.8
D
1092 ST.NIKOLAI
IMO 9788485
50,129 2018
4.8
D
1093 YELLOW STARS
IMO 9913626
49,999 2021
4.8
D
1094 MINERVA CLARA
IMO 9297333
103,231 2002
4.8
D
1095 AFRAMAX RIVIERA
IMO 9282912
104,250 2005
4.8
D
1096 MERBABU
IMO 9388364
105,746 2008
4.8
D
1097 ALTERA WIND
IMO 9863560
103,118 2021
4.8
D
1098 SAKURA PRINCESS
IMO 9358541
105,365 2007
4.8
D
1099 TP ENDURANCE
IMO 9895197
49,999 2020
4.8
D
1100 NOUNOU
IMO 9960980
115,322 2023
4.8
D
Page 22 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.