Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#117 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
2.1 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
-58% greener
A

CII band distribution

552 at D/E
A 412B 557C 554D 355E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 268 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

39
Q3
49
Q4
65
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
40
'27 Q4
48
'28 Q1
42
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,872 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,753 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,191 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,157 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 886 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 776 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

388
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,607–3,828M
capex range, top measure per vessel (388 of 388 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
101 NISSOS KEA
IMO 9920758
300,323 2022
2.0
A
103 SEAWAYS DIAMOND HEAD
IMO 9727039
301,037 2016
2.0
A
102 COSFLYING LAKE
IMO 9698771
310,421 2015
2.0
A
104 EAGLE VICTORIA
IMO 9739513
299,392 2016
2.0
A
105 AMORE MIO
IMO 9926685
299,847 2022
2.0
A
109 FOLEGANDROS
IMO 9793753
159,221 2018
2.1
A
108 NEW CONSTANT
IMO 9708514
318,625 2016
2.1
A
107 AGITOS
IMO 9830824
320,784 2019
2.1
A
106 SEADUCHESS
IMO 9876440
313,164 2022
2.1
A
110 NEW COURAGE
IMO 9686352
318,989 2015
2.1
A
111 ALMI HERCULES
IMO 9583732
319,359 2014
2.1
A
112 KALLIOPI
IMO 9508859
296,659 2010
2.1
A
113 MAXIM
IMO 9604079
296,887 2011
2.1
A
116 ILMA
IMO 9588392
314,000 2012
2.1
A
115 PERTAMINA PRIME
IMO 9888508
301,781 2021
2.1
A
114 SEAWAYS TRITON
IMO 9734654
300,932 2016
2.1
A
117 CELESTE NOVA
IMO 9534054
318,510 2013
2.1
A
120 CYPRES
IMO 9907445
158,388 2022
2.1
A
119 FRONT PRINCE
IMO 9788899
301,187 2017
2.1
A
118 TEXAS
IMO 9623685
299,999 2012
2.1
A
121 BABYLON
IMO 9878826
299,700 2020
2.1
A
123 PACIFIC
IMO 9912141
158,405 2022
2.1
A
122 FRONT PRINCESS
IMO 9788904
301,575 2018
2.1
A
127 ARZANAH
IMO 9928023
299,425 2023
2.2
A
126 SUR
IMO 9870824
299,997 2020
2.2
A
125 ANDROMEDA
IMO 9352561
321,300 2008
2.2
A
124 FRONT TWEED
IMO 9920784
299,986 2022
2.2
A
128 AEGEAN VISION
IMO 9645437
158,888 2015
2.2
A
129 BRUGGE
IMO 9941855
157,138 2023
2.2
A
131 OLYMPIC LIGHT
IMO 9424273
317,106 2011
2.2
A
130 HORTEN
IMO 9740342
297,670 2018
2.2
A
132 SEAWAYS HENDRICKS
IMO 9727015
301,014 2016
2.2
A
134 SONANGOL NJINGA MBANDE
IMO 9938494
157,663 2023
2.2
A
133 EAGLE SAN FRANCISCO
IMO 9795127
157,512 2018
2.2
A
135 AS SUWAYQ
IMO 9500728
319,478 2012
2.2
A
136 SEADUKE
IMO 9890965
313,051 2021
2.2
A
141 SEAWAYS CAPE HENRY
IMO 9727003
300,932 2013
2.2
A
140 MARAN ATHENA
IMO 9770505
319,398 2016
2.2
A
139 ADVANTAGE VALUE
IMO 9376749
297,556 2009
2.2
A
138 GREENWAY
IMO 9900796
157,327 2022
2.2
A
137 AZURE NOVA
IMO 9602631
319,743 2012
2.2
A
142 DHALKUT
IMO 9888601
300,000 2021
2.2
A
144 DHT AMAZON
IMO 9528794
318,130 2011
2.2
A
145 AMPHION
IMO 9830795
320,784 2019
2.2
A
143 YASA SCORPION
IMO 9643271
313,998 2013
2.2
A
147 VL BRILLIANT
IMO 9683673
319,300 2014
2.3
A
146 XIN DAN YANG
IMO 9614048
322,610 2013
2.3
A
149 NEW TREASURE
IMO 9799214
307,105 2019
2.3
A
148 BREST
IMO 9941867
157,071 2023
2.3
A
150 HAFEET
IMO 9928009
299,425 2023
2.3
A
Page 3 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.