Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#2,965 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
6.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+34% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2951 CLIPPER SPEY
IMO 9587219
33,985 2011
6.5
E
2952 WESTERN MAPLE
IMO 9587154
32,493 2010
6.5
E
2953 NEW LIBERTY
IMO 9221645
28,471 2002
6.5
E
2954 AQUA REGIA
IMO 9199842
29,952 1999
6.5
E
2955 ALLEGRA
IMO 9519169
35,118 2011
6.5
E
2956 UBC THESSALONIKI
IMO 9718454
37,567 2015
6.5
E
2957 DARYA SATI
IMO 9752424
64,000 2018
6.5
E
2958 DSM NORWICH
IMO 9274551
32,754 2004
6.5
E
2959 AP DRZIC
IMO 9331684
53,414 2009
6.5
E
2960 INASE
IMO 9445148
28,429 2008
6.5
E
2961 AG VALOR
IMO 9312327
28,510 2004
6.5
E
2962 NYMPHI
IMO 9615030
28,214 2012
6.5
E
2963 SEA FAITH
IMO 9655420
33,343 2014
6.5
E
2964 VEGA CAROLINE
IMO 9587166
32,491 2011
6.5
E
2965 CHARILAOS S
IMO 9493925
75,039 2011
6.5
E
2966 BELASITZA
IMO 9498262
30,696 2011
6.5
E
2967 SATURNIA
IMO 9725380
38,947 2015
6.6
E
2968 IVORY GULL
IMO 9475715
32,929 2009
6.6
E
2969 MALLIKA NAREE
IMO 9354739
30,195 2008
6.6
E
2970 SEALION
IMO 9598282
32,860 2012
6.6
E
2971 NOTA APP
IMO 9249271
53,098 2003
6.6
E
2972 JASMUND
IMO 9696840
38,868 2015
6.6
E
2973 JAOHAR UK
IMO 9302463
27,112 2003
6.6
E
2974 AT 27
IMO 9136539
26,551 1997
6.6
E
2975 JULIETTA D
IMO 9590618
37,202 2010
6.6
E
2976 LEFKES
IMO 9658783
33,398 2014
6.6
E
2977 LILA NOLA
IMO 9621041
35,501 2012
6.6
E
2978 STRATEGIC SYNERGY
IMO 9648087
40,000 2011
6.6
E
2979 FEDERAL YELLOWSTONE
IMO 9609653
37,153 2013
6.6
E
2980 URSA MINOR
IMO 9711767
40,097 2013
6.6
E
2981 ARKLOW SPIRIT
IMO 9649536
34,905 2013
6.6
E
2982 SERENITY
IMO 9544762
36,599 2011
6.6
E
2983 AP SVETI VLAHO
IMO 9331696
53,529 2009
6.6
E
2984 ACACIA
IMO 9597642
33,677 2011
6.6
E
2985 OSLEEN
IMO 9278739
33,658 2004
6.6
E
2986 CHIOS VICTORY
IMO 9680243
36,612 2015
6.6
E
2987 NIKATOR
IMO 9544372
28,336 2009
6.6
E
2988 SIGMA PIONEER
IMO 9543249
31,800 2011
6.6
E
2989 PUCK
IMO 9594250
37,930 2012
6.6
E
2990 IRYDA
IMO 9180384
34,946 1999
6.6
E
2991 RESOLUTE BAY
IMO 9626314
36,798 2012
6.6
E
2992 PORT ALICE
IMO 9311402
33,505 2005
6.6
E
2993 FOUR TURANDOT
IMO 9480710
36,460 2007
6.6
E
2994 TRANSMERIDIAN
IMO 9577757
35,853 2011
6.6
E
2995 REK GRACE
IMO 9445203
28,342 2008
6.6
E
2996 SF CHALISA
IMO 9502726
35,283 2009
6.6
E
2997 UBC TACOMA
IMO 9737888
37,332 2018
6.6
E
2998 ATLANTIS DISCOVERY
IMO 9544736
36,781 2010
6.6
E
2999 WU YI HAI
IMO 9488217
53,443 2008
6.6
E
3000 ORIENT PACE
IMO 9450753
34,390 2007
6.6
E
Page 60 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.