Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#3,332 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
7.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+60% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3301 GOLDEN MALAK
IMO 9578995
30,361 2010
7.6
E
3302 DELTA
IMO 9595395
35,147 2012
7.6
E
3303 EAST AYUTTHAYA
IMO 9584293
32,770 2010
7.6
E
3304 KOCATEPE S
IMO 9470143
16,988 2008
7.6
E
3305 MARIS WHISPER
IMO 9437517
32,688 2009
7.7
E
3306 BERNIS
IMO 9498298
35,995 2011
7.7
E
3307 LILA INCHEON
IMO 9571272
32,401 2010
7.7
E
3308 DENIZ M
IMO 9450703
37,983 2007
7.7
E
3309 STAMFORD PIONEER
IMO 9636943
32,211 2012
7.7
E
3310 ITHACA PATIENCE
IMO 9550199
28,349 2010
7.7
E
3311 V UNO
IMO 9698214
37,888 2015
7.7
E
3312 RACOON
IMO 9597989
32,519 2011
7.7
E
3313 BLUEBILL
IMO 9263306
37,332 2004
7.7
E
3314 MAJESTIC VERA
IMO 9474230
34,999 2011
7.7
E
3315 PACIFIC OCEAN
IMO 9467562
36,009 2011
7.7
E
3316 COMMANDER K
IMO 9650494
35,207 2012
7.7
E
3317 AETERNO
IMO 9474228
34,954 2011
7.7
E
3318 CLIPPER CLYDE
IMO 9455911
31,639 2012
7.7
E
3319 ATHOS
IMO 9320336
30,618 2007
7.7
E
3320 DSM EVERTON
IMO 9250701
32,474 2002
7.7
E
3321 MIEDWIE
IMO 9393448
30,481 2010
7.8
E
3322 DSM LONDON
IMO 9481946
36,489 2010
7.8
E
3323 MOTTLER
IMO 9477828
30,807 2009
7.8
E
3324 JULIETTE
IMO 9459113
34,398 2012
7.8
E
3325 LU YANG SHUN
IMO 9634880
29,061 2012
7.8
E
3326 SAINT VASSILIOS
IMO 9486403
33,889 2007
7.8
E
3327 SAFI FORTUNE
IMO 9550321
28,467 2009
7.8
E
3328 ZEYNEP KIRAN
IMO 9015577
29,330 2001
7.8
E
3329 AMIRA SARA
IMO 9691503
28,339 2014
7.8
E
3330 YANGTZE DIGNITY
IMO 9584217
32,414 2012
7.8
E
3331 MJ MASSA
IMO 9224867
29,944 2002
7.8
E
3332 LILLY BOLTEN
IMO 9406063
30,765 2009
7.8
E
3333 CINNAMON
IMO 9239800
26,737 2003
7.8
E
3334 RUDDY
IMO 9459981
30,930 2009
7.8
E
3335 SPRING SEA
IMO 9639751
35,280 2013
7.8
E
3336 GOKOVA-M
IMO 9243526
52,512 2002
7.8
E
3337 VEGA DABLAM
IMO 9643790
35,000 2011
7.8
E
3338 RED LION
IMO 9159062
26,566 1997
7.8
E
3339 LV DAISY
IMO 9597991
32,580 2011
7.8
E
3340 DU AN CHENG
IMO 9484039
31,775 2011
7.8
E
3341 SEA BRIDLE
IMO 9047001
26,446 1993
7.8
E
3342 BAM ARION
IMO 9414450
30,000 2012
7.8
E
3343 GRANDMA LILA
IMO 9450820
34,372 2011
7.8
E
3344 ALEA
IMO 9550266
28,319 2009
7.8
E
3345 LUBIE
IMO 9441984
30,210 2011
7.8
E
3346 SEAGLASS II
IMO 9498925
29,124 2008
7.8
E
3347 VEGA EVEREST
IMO 9602693
35,304 2011
7.8
E
3348 ZOI
IMO 9608697
32,178 2012
7.9
E
3349 LOUISA BOLTEN
IMO 9406049
30,765 2009
7.9
E
3350 ORIENT PRIDE
IMO 9450739
34,402 2010
7.9
E
Page 67 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.