Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#3,334 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
7.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
+60% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
3301 TBC PRAISE
IMO 9595151
36,699 2012
7.6
E
3302 EAST AYUTTHAYA
IMO 9584293
32,770 2010
7.6
E
3303 GOLDEN MALAK
IMO 9578995
30,360 2010
7.6
E
3304 DELTA
IMO 9595395
35,147 2012
7.6
E
3305 KOCATEPE S
IMO 9470143
16,988 2008
7.6
E
3306 MARIS WHISPER
IMO 9437517
32,688 2009
7.7
E
3307 BERNIS
IMO 9498298
35,995 2011
7.7
E
3308 LILA INCHEON
IMO 9571272
32,401 2010
7.7
E
3309 DENIZ M
IMO 9450703
37,983 2007
7.7
E
3310 STAMFORD PIONEER
IMO 9636943
32,211 2012
7.7
E
3311 ITHACA PATIENCE
IMO 9550199
28,349 2010
7.7
E
3312 V UNO
IMO 9698214
37,888 2015
7.7
E
3313 RACOON
IMO 9597989
32,519 2011
7.7
E
3314 BLUEBILL
IMO 9263306
37,332 2004
7.7
E
3315 MAJESTIC VERA
IMO 9474230
34,999 2011
7.7
E
3316 PACIFIC OCEAN
IMO 9467562
36,009 2011
7.7
E
3317 COMMANDER K
IMO 9650494
35,207 2012
7.7
E
3318 AETERNO
IMO 9474228
34,954 2011
7.7
E
3319 CLIPPER CLYDE
IMO 9455911
31,639 2012
7.7
E
3320 ATHOS
IMO 9320336
30,618 2007
7.7
E
3321 AKSON SANDRA
IMO 9537264
37,506 2010
7.7
E
3322 DSM EVERTON
IMO 9250701
32,474 2002
7.7
E
3323 DSM LONDON
IMO 9481946
36,489 2010
7.8
E
3324 MIEDWIE
IMO 9393448
30,481 2010
7.8
E
3325 MOTTLER
IMO 9477828
30,807 2009
7.8
E
3326 JULIETTE
IMO 9459113
34,398 2012
7.8
E
3327 LU YANG SHUN
IMO 9634880
29,061 2012
7.8
E
3328 SAINT VASSILIOS
IMO 9486403
33,889 2007
7.8
E
3329 SAFI FORTUNE
IMO 9550321
28,467 2009
7.8
E
3330 AMIRA SARA
IMO 9691503
28,339 2014
7.8
E
3331 YANGTZE DIGNITY
IMO 9584217
32,414 2012
7.8
E
3332 MJ MASSA
IMO 9224867
29,944 2002
7.8
E
3333 ZEYNEP KIRAN
IMO 9015577
29,330 2001
7.8
E
3334 LILLY BOLTEN
IMO 9406063
30,765 2009
7.8
E
3335 CINNAMON
IMO 9239800
26,737 2003
7.8
E
3336 VEGA DABLAM
IMO 9643790
35,112 2011
7.8
E
3337 RUDDY
IMO 9459981
30,930 2009
7.8
E
3338 GOKOVA-M
IMO 9243526
52,512 2002
7.8
E
3339 SPRING SEA
IMO 9639751
35,200 2013
7.8
E
3340 DU AN CHENG
IMO 9484039
31,775 2011
7.8
E
3341 SC DALLAS
IMO 9587180
32,491 2011
7.8
E
3342 RED LION
IMO 9159062
26,566 1997
7.8
E
3343 LV DAISY
IMO 9597991
32,581 2011
7.8
E
3344 SEA BRIDLE
IMO 9047001
26,446 1993
7.8
E
3345 GRANDMA LILA
IMO 9450820
34,372 2011
7.8
E
3346 BAM ARION
IMO 9414450
30,000 2012
7.8
E
3347 SEAGLASS II
IMO 9498925
29,124 2008
7.8
E
3348 VEGA EVEREST
IMO 9602693
35,304 2011
7.8
E
3349 ALEA
IMO 9550266
28,319 2009
7.8
E
3350 LOUISA BOLTEN
IMO 9406049
30,765 2009
7.9
E
Page 67 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.