Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#957 of 1,190 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
15.2 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.9)
+39% higher
E

CII band distribution

509 at D/E
A 1,033B 687C 506D 258E 251

2,735 rated vessels · 274 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

47
Q4
56
'27 Q1
59
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
38
'27 Q4
55
'28 Q1
45
'28 Q2
32
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 789 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 789 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 681 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 570 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 102 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

246
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€96–287M
capex range, top measure per vessel (246 of 246 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.12 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
KOKODA CHIEF · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,215
vessels ranked
3.23
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
11.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
951 SLUISGRACHT
IMO 9202522
21,449 2001
15.1
D
952 TURAN C
IMO 9558490
18,429 2010
15.1
D
953 RAMA H
IMO 8105404
8,214 1982
15.2
E
954 AZOV CONCEPT
IMO 9345726
8,048 2006
15.2
E
955 KRIS
IMO 9408889
8,678 2007
15.2
E
956 KAREWOOD STAR
IMO 9363986
6,315 2007
15.2
E
957 AZZARO
IMO 9213727
8,733 2000
15.2
E
958 PRETTY AYA
IMO 9581710
8,397 2012
15.2
E
959 UKPIK
IMO 9468114
12,575 2011
15.2
E
960 VECHTBORG
IMO 9160334
9,567 1998
15.2
E
961 ONEGO OTRA
IMO 9535606
10,872 2010
15.2
E
962 WILSON NEWCASTLE
IMO 9431006
8,701 2011
15.2
E
963 HOUTMANGRACHT
IMO 9435765
12,635 2009
15.2
E
964 JUTLAND
IMO 9277345
7,870 2004
15.2
E
965 BEAUTRIDENT
IMO 9369306
7,223 2008
15.3
E
966 LOVISA
IMO 9957397
7,896 2023
15.3
E
967 IJSSELBORG
IMO 9456745
12,016 2010
15.3
E
968 TRADE NAVIGATOR
IMO 9631371
8,095 2013
15.3
E
969 O7 LAFITE
IMO 9534482
10,049 2013
15.3
E
970 ONEGO GLOMMA
IMO 9294977
10,649 2004
15.3
E
971 ROGALAND
IMO 9505596
9,734 2011
15.3
E
972 WILSON NANTES
IMO 9430973
8,709 2011
15.3
E
973 OCEAN CARRIER
IMO 9349435
9,653 2010
15.3
E
974 WILSON NARVIK
IMO 9430961
8,724 2011
15.4
E
975 SPRING
IMO 8408650
8,881 1985
15.4
E
976 ONEGO OLZA
IMO 9511648
10,500 2010
15.4
E
977 TITTERI
IMO 9685085
11,815 2016
15.4
E
978 KAREWOOD GLORY
IMO 9281504
6,315 2006
15.4
E
979 FRANZISKA
IMO 9535618
10,872 2011
15.4
E
980 MARIETJE DEBORAH
IMO 9481594
8,486 2011
15.4
E
981 ANNA
IMO 9631345
8,096 2013
15.4
E
982 HAPPY ROVER
IMO 9139309
15,443 1997
15.4
E
983 O7 GAJA
IMO 9273791
12,767 2006
15.5
E
984 BEAUTRADER
IMO 9428657
7,211 2009
15.5
E
985 WILSON NANJING
IMO 9431018
8,703 2012
15.5
E
986 JAMTLAND
IMO 9277319
7,755 2003
15.5
E
987 OCEAN TRADER
IMO 9349461
9,705 2011
15.5
E
988 UGAH DISCOVERY
IMO 9823871
6,004 2019
15.5
E
989 ABANA
IMO 9158070
8,362 1998
15.5
E
990 EBRU
IMO 9235490
9,623 2000
15.5
E
991 AK HAMZA
IMO 9338125
8,710 2005
15.6
E
992 OPPLAND
IMO 9505613
9,744 2011
15.6
E
993 FAGELGRACHT
IMO 9428425
12,191 2011
15.6
E
994 FLEVOGRACHT
IMO 9509956
12,086 2011
15.6
E
995 SEA DISCOVERY
IMO 9516131
9,732 2012
15.6
E
996 MEDEMBORG
IMO 9142514
9,769 1997
15.6
E
997 KLAUS
IMO 9570632
7,909 2011
15.6
E
998 JUNO
IMO 9421154
7,807 2009
15.6
E
999 BBC ROSARIO
IMO 9337224
12,873 2007
15.7
E
1000 ARGO
IMO 9421128
7,816 2009
15.7
E
Page 20 of 24 — 1,190 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.