Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#740 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
9.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-6% greener
C

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.79
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
701 LIBERA
IMO 9293973
40,102 2006
8.9
C
702 CHEM SCEPTRUM
IMO 9731793
27,130 2017
8.9
C
703 MTM TORTOLA
IMO 9742065
22,396 2016
8.9
C
704 NCC YANBU
IMO 9458808
45,553 2010
8.9
C
705 HAFNIA TORRES
IMO 9729283
39,067 2016
8.9
C
706 KATSUYAMA
IMO 9274678
36,809 2005
8.9
C
707 DELPHI
IMO 9283796
37,432 2004
8.9
C
708 PACIFICO
IMO 9876830
22,554 2022
8.9
C
709 MTM SAVANNAH
IMO 9726750
22,430 2015
8.9
C
710 ARDMORE CHEYENNE
IMO 9707857
25,217 2013
8.9
C
711 BHARAT
IMO 9253595
40,128 2003
8.9
C
712 BLUE ROSE
IMO 9335915
38,402 2007
8.9
C
713 HTM WARRIOR
IMO 9399911
50,576 2009
8.9
C
714 BERNICE
IMO 9220926
42,721 2001
9.0
C
715 CHEM RANGER
IMO 9490296
26,198 2010
9.0
C
716 EK-STREAM
IMO 9808261
19,881 2018
9.0
C
717 SAKURA BELLE
IMO 9568500
26,960 2011
9.0
C
718 FAIRCHEM ALDEBARAN
IMO 9552666
19,697 2017
9.0
C
719 FAIRCHEM TRIUMPH
IMO 9758038
22,354 2017
9.1
C
720 CHEM NEON
IMO 9815264
19,972 2018
9.1
C
721 FAIRCHEM SUCCESS
IMO 9758090
22,346 2017
9.1
C
722 PORTARIA
IMO 9464326
36,677 2010
9.1
C
723 MOUNT EVEREST
IMO 9470985
37,817 2010
9.1
C
724 ALFRED N
IMO 9749324
25,161 2016
9.1
C
725 EASTERLY CANYON
IMO 9383974
36,677 2009
9.1
C
726 STOLT TENACITY
IMO 9680102
38,907 2017
9.1
C
727 EASTERLY SIRIUS
IMO 9455052
36,677 2010
9.1
C
728 BOW JAGUAR
IMO 9989209
25,877 2024
9.1
C
729 MTM AMSTERDAM
IMO 9776444
21,176 2018
9.2
C
730 CIELO DI CAPRI
IMO 9717278
39,043 2016
9.2
C
731 SFL ARUBA
IMO 9919761
33,325 2022
9.2
C
732 BOURDA
IMO 9252448
47,323 2003
9.2
C
733 RF STELLA
IMO 9580998
19,132 2011
9.2
C
734 NOREASTER
IMO 9350642
37,412 2007
9.2
C
735 PS VANCOUVER
IMO 9379337
50,922 2007
9.2
C
736 STOLT BISMUTH
IMO 9739290
27,570 2016
9.2
C
737 TRUST GALAXY
IMO 9860192
21,020 2019
9.2
C
738 GINGA LIGER
IMO 9893448
25,064 2021
9.2
C
739 PROSPERO
IMO 9876828
22,543 2021
9.3
C
740 GINGA OCELOT
IMO 9581423
26,063 2013
9.3
C
741 STOLT ACER
IMO 9272668
29,709 2004
9.3
C
742 FAIRCHEM MAKO
IMO 9826574
25,169 2018
9.3
C
743 ZAGARA
IMO 9231171
37,320 2002
9.3
C
744 LOYAL
IMO 9345881
23,322 2006
9.3
C
745 GULF FANATIR
IMO 9359868
45,920 2008
9.3
C
746 PRABHU PARVATI
IMO 9423621
19,918 2008
9.3
C
747 CIELO DI GAETA
IMO 9669653
39,990 2014
9.3
C
748 SFL BONAIRE
IMO 9919773
33,338 2023
9.3
C
749 STOLT OCELOT
IMO 9459539
23,324 2008
9.3
C
750 GEORGIA
IMO 9302683
40,327 2006
9.3
C
Page 15 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.