Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#776 of 1,350 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
9.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.91)
-3% greener
C

CII band distribution

415 at D/E
A 388B 447C 448D 293E 122

1,698 rated vessels · 169 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

21
Q4
46
'27 Q1
34
'27 Q2
29
'27 Q3
36
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
30
'28 Q2
23
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,272 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,234 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 1,077 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 915 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 686 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

278
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€647–1,598M
capex range, top measure per vessel (278 of 278 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.19 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 18y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,378
vessels ranked
3.64
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.82
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
751 ANTARES
IMO 9723019
37,867 2015
9.3
C
752 SERENA M
IMO 9444508
34,999 2010
9.4
C
753 ASTERION
IMO 9595125
37,583 2011
9.4
C
754 STOLT SEQUOIA
IMO 9235062
37,620 2003
9.4
C
755 LYDIA KA
IMO 9314844
37,258 2007
9.4
C
756 NORDIC MASA
IMO 9451410
20,819 2009
9.4
C
757 STROMBOLI M
IMO 9595137
37,583 2011
9.4
C
758 OASIS
IMO 9512173
26,199 2011
9.4
C
759 ARDMORE CHIPPEWA
IMO 9707871
25,211 2013
9.4
C
760 BIXBITE
IMO 9316610
39,999 2009
9.4
C
761 FUTURA
IMO 9293961
40,085 2006
9.4
C
762 SHENGHUI GLORY
IMO 9724037
19,883 2015
9.5
C
763 PVT JUPITER
IMO 9408803
20,832 2008
9.5
C
764 FAIRCHEM HAWK
IMO 9804813
19,956 2019
9.5
C
765 GINGA ENDURANCE
IMO 9800441
25,986 2020
9.5
C
766 BOW EXCELLENCE
IMO 9828223
38,235 2020
9.5
C
767 MAGIC STAR
IMO 9420253
38,423 2009
9.5
C
768 MARVEA
IMO 9301897
39,999 2006
9.5
C
769 BOW PANTHER
IMO 9952153
26,001 2022
9.5
C
770 LILAC RAY
IMO 9883481
21,028 2020
9.5
C
771 CUTLASS GALAXY
IMO 9746164
19,985 2015
9.5
C
772 PURPLE RAY
IMO 9804899
19,987 2020
9.5
C
773 CAPIBARA
IMO 9267027
38,877 2004
9.6
C
774 STOLT SYCAMORE
IMO 9198563
37,622 2000
9.6
C
775 EASTERLY JUPITER
IMO 9383962
36,677 2009
9.6
C
776 THUN LONDON
IMO 9828986
18,684 2019
9.6
C
777 RF MARINA
IMO 9580986
19,100 2011
9.6
C
778 RADIANT RAY
IMO 9749697
19,974 2018
9.6
C
779 DM BEA
IMO 9674763
25,932 2013
9.6
C
780 INDIGO RAY
IMO 9716016
19,989 2016
9.6
C
781 SEYCHELLES PIONEER
IMO 9255517
37,500 2005
9.6
C
782 BIT WAVE
IMO 9904041
13,822 2022
9.6
C
783 CHEM SILICON
IMO 9829681
19,977 2018
9.6
C
784 STOLT BASUTO
IMO 9351543
25,197 2006
9.7
C
785 MARQUETTE
IMO 9732785
37,596 2016
9.7
C
786 GINGA BOBCAT
IMO 9472737
25,954 2010
9.7
C
787 STOLT ZULU
IMO 9351531
25,197 2006
9.7
C
788 STOLT LOTUS
IMO 9617648
30,345 2014
9.7
C
789 HAZAR
IMO 9290830
37,270 2005
9.7
C
790 EASTERLY EAGLE
IMO 9423750
25,390 2010
9.7
C
791 MTM HOUSTON
IMO 9505924
19,741 2010
9.8
C
792 CHEM BARCELONA
IMO 9725835
19,997 2016
9.8
C
793 RUDOLF SCHULTE
IMO 9576765
25,581 2011
9.8
C
794 EVA TOKYO
IMO 9865520
19,841 2019
9.8
C
795 TERN SEA
IMO 9747974
14,878 2016
9.8
C
796 FAIRCHEM SABRE
IMO 9657478
19,994 2013
9.8
C
797 KOMODO PARK
IMO 9981465
19,981 2024
9.8
C
798 CHEM NEW ORLEANS
IMO 9705756
19,996 2015
9.8
C
799 CHEMICAL HUNTER
IMO 9758789
16,081 2015
9.9
C
800 CHEM COBALT
IMO 9740770
19,990 2016
9.9
C
Page 16 of 27 — 1,350 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.