Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#950 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
4.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-16% greener
C

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
901 JAARLI
IMO 9892432
112,459 2021
4.2
C
902 DUBAI ATTRACTION
IMO 9422536
115,459 2011
4.2
C
903 EUROINTEGRITY
IMO 9410648
105,291 2009
4.2
C
904 KMARIN RENOWN
IMO 9683013
109,693 2016
4.2
C
905 MAERSK CYPRUS
IMO 9786217
49,919 2020
4.2
C
906 NISSOS SERIFOS
IMO 9592264
115,688 2010
4.2
C
907 PALLADIUM
IMO 9773923
113,221 2017
4.2
C
908 ADVANTAGE START
IMO 9466570
156,644 2011
4.2
C
909 STI ELYSEES
IMO 9688829
109,999 2013
4.2
C
910 AEGEAN NOBILITY
IMO 9345441
115,814 2007
4.2
C
911 MAERSK CANCUN
IMO 9786138
49,919 2018
4.2
C
912 AQUALEGACY
IMO 9601833
115,763 2010
4.2
C
913 INDIGO SUN
IMO 9592288
115,724 2012
4.2
C
914 STI GAUNTLET
IMO 9717137
109,999 2017
4.2
C
915 TOVE KNUTSEN
IMO 9868376
152,868 2020
4.2
C
916 GLADIATOR
IMO 9378864
149,944 2008
4.2
C
917 FPMC P IDEAL
IMO 9459709
109,994 2006
4.3
C
918 ANIKITOS
IMO 9953444
50,113 2023
4.3
C
919 KMARIN RESPECT
IMO 9683001
109,584 2016
4.3
C
920 TORM EVELYN
IMO 9456927
74,606 2011
4.3
C
921 CABO MISAKI
IMO 9755062
74,177 2017
4.3
C
922 JAG SPARROW
IMO 9297412
74,999 2005
4.3
C
923 KMARIN RESOURCE
IMO 9683037
109,483 2016
4.3
C
924 ADVANTAGE SPRING
IMO 9466582
156,596 2010
4.3
C
925 BAYOU SUN
IMO 9911537
49,999 2022
4.3
C
926 PHOENIX ADMIRAL
IMO 9482603
114,024 2007
4.3
C
927 PACIFIC NAFSIKA
IMO 9732278
109,999 2016
4.3
C
928 MARCILIO DIAS
IMO 9453858
157,055 2009
4.3
C
929 OLIB
IMO 9334739
108,433 2009
4.3
C
930 HOVDEN SPIRIT
IMO 9596997
105,276 2010
4.3
C
931 STI SYMPHONY
IMO 9719692
109,999 2015
4.3
C
932 NORDIC LIGHT
IMO 9436446
158,555 2010
4.3
C
933 HAFNIA ANDREA
IMO 9688415
50,040 2013
4.3
C
934 TP AFFINITY
IMO 9645401
114,070 2016
4.3
C
935 LUZON SPIRIT
IMO 9572276
109,581 2008
4.3
C
936 CAPE BILBAO
IMO 1035052
50,606 2023
4.3
C
937 SEA VALIANT
IMO 9420629
107,488 2010
4.3
C
938 YASA GOLDEN DARDANELLES
IMO 9339985
110,828 2008
4.3
C
939 FOSSIL
IMO 9379624
115,760 2009
4.3
C
940 DELTA STAR
IMO 9458016
115,618 2013
4.3
C
941 BLUE PRINCE
IMO 9429182
109,010 2009
4.3
C
942 STELLATA
IMO 9732230
109,991 2016
4.3
C
943 LADY HENRIETTA
IMO 9604380
111,815 2012
4.3
C
944 KMARIN RESOLUTION
IMO 9683051
109,484 2016
4.3
C
945 CABO FROWARD
IMO 9311359
74,543 2006
4.3
C
946 SAGA
IMO 9528031
115,739 2008
4.3
C
947 CLIO
IMO 9396660
112,705 2008
4.3
C
948 CALYPSO
IMO 9899296
111,930 2021
4.3
C
949 NORTHERNLIGHT
IMO 9577123
74,565 2012
4.3
C
950 CALIDA
IMO 9522128
115,812 2008
4.3
C
Page 19 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.