Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,513 of 1,789 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
7.3 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.1)
+44% higher
E

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,826
vessels ranked
1.36
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.12
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1501 VISION
IMO 9295347
37,343 2006
7.2
E
1502 STI CAMDEN
IMO 9688386
38,734 2014
7.2
E
1503 CECH
IMO 9617442
42,150 2011
7.2
E
1504 M BRIGIT
IMO 9340582
29,017 2006
7.3
E
1505 KRITI STATE
IMO 9324289
76,565 2006
7.3
E
1506 HISTRIA TIGER
IMO 9396335
40,420 2008
7.3
E
1507 HAFNIA SUNDA
IMO 9725639
39,067 2015
7.3
E
1508 ROSE M
IMO 9311000
45,838 2005
7.3
E
1509 HISTRIA AGATA
IMO 9357559
40,440 2007
7.3
E
1510 ASPHALT SPLENDOR
IMO 9763332
36,962 2015
7.3
E
1511 ATLAS T
IMO 9441855
47,987 2010
7.3
E
1512 SEACLIPPER
IMO 9570101
48,554 2013
7.3
E
1513 COSMOGRAPH
IMO 9324459
47,326 2005
7.3
E
1514 OCEAN VENTURE
IMO 9660657
49,995 2014
7.3
E
1515 ASPHALT SYNERGY
IMO 9794159
36,771 2018
7.4
E
1516 SEA ALTUS
IMO 9724570
39,999 2017
7.4
E
1517 KANALA
IMO 9425552
49,997 2010
7.4
E
1518 BITU ATLANTIC
IMO 9382085
45,986 2008
7.4
E
1519 VELOS FORZA
IMO 9561370
48,008 2010
7.4
E
1520 MAERSK ADRIATIC
IMO 9636632
37,538 2012
7.4
E
1521 MAERSK BERING
IMO 9299422
29,057 2005
7.4
E
1522 TIGER EYE
IMO 9746255
49,990 2013
7.4
E
1523 TWINKLE STAR
IMO 9363780
45,750 2006
7.5
E
1524 RITA M
IMO 9414278
45,997 2009
7.5
E
1525 CLEAN NIRVANA
IMO 9308168
50,359 2008
7.5
E
1526 HISTRIA PERLA
IMO 9301287
39,999 2005
7.6
E
1527 STI HACKNEY
IMO 9686883
38,734 2014
7.6
E
1528 MAERSK AEGEAN
IMO 9636644
37,538 2013
7.6
E
1529 NAVE TITAN
IMO 9487469
49,996 2013
7.6
E
1530 LANIKAI
IMO 9240897
46,342 2002
7.7
E
1531 HISTRIA AZURE
IMO 9357561
40,394 2007
7.7
E
1532 MYKLEBUST
IMO 9914632
29,649 2022
7.7
E
1533 MINERVA JOANNA
IMO 9380386
46,924 2008
7.8
E
1534 MARIANNA V.V.
IMO 9259707
84,999 2001
7.8
E
1535 STI FULHAM
IMO 9688374
38,734 2014
7.8
E
1536 MINERVA JOY
IMO 9363479
45,990 2008
7.8
E
1537 HISTRIA CORAL
IMO 9301299
39,999 2006
7.8
E
1538 KIRSTEN MAERSK
IMO 9431264
39,729 2010
7.8
E
1539 HISTRIA GIADA
IMO 9396323
40,448 2007
7.8
E
1540 PACCHA
IMO 9512185
50,091 2009
7.9
E
1541 SIMOON
IMO 9274525
151,174 2004
7.9
E
1542 MANILA I
IMO 9242326
46,839 2000
7.9
E
1543 STONE I
IMO 9380582
37,889 2008
7.9
E
1544 BOW HECTOR
IMO 9363493
33,694 2008
7.9
E
1545 ETHERA
IMO 9387279
46,606 2008
7.9
E
1546 OSCAR
IMO 9365386
49,995 2007
8.0
E
1547 VS SPIRIT
IMO 9339636
34,671 2007
8.0
E
1548 PIONEER
IMO 9260079
40,055 2001
8.0
E
1549 BITU EXPRESS
IMO 9265689
49,282 2003
8.0
E
1550 BRITISH CAPTAIN
IMO 9724685
45,999 2013
8.0
E
Page 31 of 36 — 1,789 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.