Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Oil Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#633 of 1,651 oil tankers
CO₂ intensity
3.5 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (5.18)
-32% greener
B

CII band distribution

551 at D/E
A 411B 557C 556D 354E 197

2,075 rated vessels · 250 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

51
Q4
64
'27 Q1
52
'27 Q2
27
'27 Q3
39
'27 Q4
54
'28 Q1
43
'28 Q2
30
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,790 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,674 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 1,267 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 1,163 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 1,129 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 1,052 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

392
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€1,483–3,536M
capex range, top measure per vessel (392 of 392 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.46 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PAULA GLORY · 25-60k E 3y 2026
OLYMPIC TROPHY · >200k E 16y 2026
SEALING · 25-60k E 23y 2026
EOS T · <25k E 20y 2026
HERCULES SUN · <25k E 4y 2026
See all 2,075 rated oil tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,685
vessels ranked
1.32
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.01
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
597 MARAN PLATO
IMO 9399507
158,267 2009
3.4
B
596 SONANGOL KALANDULA
IMO 9575553
157,955 2010
3.4
B
601 PHAETHON
IMO 9412098
158,267 2009
3.4
B
605 NAFSIKA
IMO 9913511
112,051 2022
3.5
B
604 IONIC ARIADNE
IMO 9856555
112,007 2020
3.5
B
606 HAFNIA LARISSA
IMO 9800300
109,990 2019
3.5
B
607 TORM GITTE
IMO 9426312
119,456 2010
3.5
B
610 SFL THELON
IMO 9593000
159,500 2015
3.5
B
609 PACIFIC EMERALD
IMO 9893022
113,306 2021
3.5
B
611 EAGLE BINTULU
IMO 9795074
113,400 2015
3.5
B
608 PORTINARI
IMO 9547714
115,727 2008
3.5
B
616 PEACE VICTORIA
IMO 9771028
77,378 2019
3.5
B
613 DELTA IOS
IMO 9406685
157,484 2009
3.5
B
612 HAIFENG
IMO 9792840
109,898 2018
3.5
B
615 MARE SICULUM
IMO 9457892
158,466 2011
3.5
B
614 NAVIG8 PRESTIGE JKB
IMO 9831309
111,000 2015
3.5
B
617 ORPHEAS
IMO 9318149
167,282 2007
3.5
B
619 TORM GWENDOLYN
IMO 9428982
119,456 2010
3.5
B
618 STI PARK
IMO 9690793
109,999 2013
3.5
B
621 CLEAROCEAN APOLLON
IMO 9850707
113,252 2019
3.5
B
620 SEASENATOR
IMO 9304368
105,715 2003
3.5
B
623 ALMI VOYAGER
IMO 9579585
157,638 2014
3.5
B
622 STI GUIDE
IMO 9717113
109,999 2016
3.5
B
627 SPARTO
IMO 9865116
115,468 2020
3.5
B
626 LEONTIOS H
IMO 9724336
113,611 2016
3.5
B
625 ARCTIC
IMO 9315173
163,216 2004
3.5
B
624 CLEAROCEAN AJAX
IMO 9850692
113,252 2019
3.5
B
630 CARIBBEAN VOYAGER
IMO 9857860
115,165 2018
3.5
B
629 FEZZAN
IMO 9888730
114,243 2021
3.5
B
631 ADVANTAGE SWEET
IMO 9587192
159,058 2012
3.5
B
628 AL RUWAIS
IMO 9828405
114,695 2021
3.5
B
632 SAPPHIRA
IMO 9336983
149,876 2008
3.5
B
636 SEATRUST
IMO 9979993
115,000 2022
3.5
B
635 SPYROS K
IMO 9565948
157,648 2009
3.5
B
634 OTTOMAN INTEGRITY
IMO 9530618
149,999 2011
3.5
B
633 FRONT OCELOT
IMO 9726580
109,900 2016
3.5
B
638 NAVIG8 PRECISION
IMO 9831294
109,994 2015
3.5
B
637 ALFIOS I
IMO 9923009
115,351 2022
3.5
B
643 STRESA
IMO 9912866
115,335 2020
3.5
B
642 ELANDRA SOUND
IMO 9821706
115,666 2018
3.5
B
641 SEA DRAGON
IMO 9903918
114,217 2019
3.5
B
640 NEW VISION
IMO 9804459
157,617 2018
3.5
B
639 SEAODYSSEY
IMO 9740419
113,176 2013
3.5
B
646 KYRAKATINGO
IMO 9779965
113,563 2017
3.5
B
645 EAGLE KUANTAN
IMO 9417012
107,481 2010
3.5
B
644 SEABORN
IMO 9980007
115,000 2022
3.5
B
650 SANTHIA
IMO 9978705
115,062 2022
3.5
B
649 HAFNIA LOIRE
IMO 9941697
109,999 2023
3.5
B
648 ARETEA
IMO 9711456
113,969 2015
3.5
B
647 MINERVA BALTICA
IMO 9728241
113,172 2015
3.5
B
Page 13 of 34 — 1,651 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.