Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Chemical Tanker Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#756 of 1,422 chemical tankers
CO₂ intensity
8.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (9.4)
-8% greener
C

CII band distribution

414 at D/E
A 388B 445C 451D 293E 121

1,698 rated vessels · 175 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

34
Q3
23
Q4
46
'27 Q1
33
'27 Q2
32
'27 Q3
37
'27 Q4
31
'28 Q1
28
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,299 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 968 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 929 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 882 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 696 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

262
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€693–1,706M
capex range, top measure per vessel (262 of 262 with computable scaling)
0.09–0.20 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
MEHTAP · 25-60k E 18y 2026
MARIA IMMACULATA · <25k E 14y 2026
HARBOUR PROGRESS · <25k E 16y 2026
HERCULES SKY · <25k E 5y 2026
NAVE ATRIA · 25-60k E 14y 2026
See all 1,698 rated chemical tankers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
1,451
vessels ranked
3.48
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.28
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
751 VELOS TOPAZ
IMO 9360441
39,808 2007
8.5
C
752 MTM ROTTERDAM
IMO 9477567
21,144 2011
8.6
C
753 NAEBA GALAXY
IMO 9791169
26,196 2018
8.6
C
754 MISTRAL WIND
IMO 9907005
33,293 2022
8.6
C
755 GC SAPPHIRE
IMO 9924924
19,993 2022
8.6
C
756 BOCHEM GHENT
IMO 9565649
33,628 2011
8.6
C
757 BOCHEM BUCEPHALAS
IMO 9760550
25,087 2017
8.6
C
758 FAIRCHEM PRESTIGE
IMO 9984261
26,328 2024
8.6
C
759 ESENTEPE
IMO 9247508
40,250 2004
8.6
C
760 CHEM STELLAR
IMO 9731755
25,196 2016
8.6
C
761 KRITI JADE
IMO 9391311
50,563 2008
8.6
C
762 MALBEC LEGEND
IMO 9732814
37,596 2016
8.6
C
763 SEA ALTUS
IMO 9724570
39,999 2017
8.7
C
764 LYDIA KA
IMO 9314844
37,258 2007
8.7
C
765 EDGE GALAXY
IMO 9788954
19,946 2017
8.7
C
766 MARIE C
IMO 9749348
25,161 2014
8.7
C
767 ORCHID MADEIRA
IMO 9367401
21,205 2009
8.7
C
768 OGINO PARK
IMO 9725873
19,992 2017
8.7
C
769 HAFNIA SOYA
IMO 9729271
39,067 2015
8.7
C
770 BOW LION
IMO 9952177
26,021 2023
8.7
C
771 CHEM RANGER
IMO 9490296
26,198 2010
8.7
C
772 STOLT SYCAMORE
IMO 9198563
37,622 2000
8.7
C
773 TIVY GOLD
IMO 9251559
39,999 2003
8.8
C
774 SEASALVIA
IMO 9629550
50,660 2013
8.8
C
775 HAKUBA GALAXY
IMO 9804916
25,182 2021
8.8
C
776 PROSPERO
IMO 9876828
22,543 2021
8.8
C
777 NORDIC MASA
IMO 9451410
20,819 2009
8.8
C
778 MARINER A
IMO 9288954
40,099 2005
8.8
C
779 STOLT VISION
IMO 9274329
25,147 2005
8.8
C
780 GEORGIA
IMO 9302683
40,327 2006
8.8
C
781 CAPELLA
IMO 9278650
32,315 2003
8.8
C
782 KATSUYAMA
IMO 9274678
36,809 2005
8.8
C
783 EVA TRUST
IMO 9986037
19,913 2025
8.8
C
784 UOG KORTHI
IMO 9458808
45,553 2010
8.8
C
785 TAKAO GALAXY
IMO 9920069
26,374 2022
8.8
C
786 LUCKY LADY
IMO 9288796
37,432 2005
8.8
C
787 SEA STRATUS
IMO 9724556
39,999 2017
8.8
C
788 SOLAR NESRIN
IMO 9877626
25,039 2020
8.9
C
789 PRELUDE
IMO 9360439
39,988 2007
8.9
C
790 ULUS
IMO 9314806
37,311 2006
8.9
C
791 ARDMORE CHEROKEE
IMO 9707845
25,215 2015
8.9
C
792 BOW LEOPARD
IMO 9952165
26,004 2023
8.9
C
793 STOLT KIRI
IMO 9266231
19,508 2003
8.9
C
794 ORIENTAL IXIA
IMO 9924728
16,298 2023
8.9
C
795 MOUNT KIBO
IMO 9470997
37,843 2010
9.0
C
796 SEYCHELLES PRELUDE
IMO 9365623
45,680 2007
9.0
C
797 CUTLASS GALAXY
IMO 9746164
19,985 2015
9.0
C
798 STOLT BOBCAT
IMO 9511167
23,432 2009
9.0
C
799 GINGA PUMA
IMO 9343780
26,046 2006
9.0
C
800 SEA TRADER
IMO 9742077
22,423 2016
9.0
C
Page 16 of 29 — 1,422 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.