Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#1,788 of 3,531 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
4.6 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.87)
-5% greener
C

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 765E 536

4,717 rated vessels · 560 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
123
Q4
133
'27 Q1
76
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
106
'27 Q4
102
'28 Q1
83
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,938 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,887 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 3,009 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 2,539 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 2,443 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 2,432 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,097
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,987–11,902M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,097 of 1,097 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,604
vessels ranked
1.42
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.65
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1751 NORD SINGAPORE
IMO 9913535
42,904 2022
4.6
C
1752 STAR ANTARES
IMO 9712694
61,258 2015
4.6
C
1753 LIBERTY
IMO 9423542
58,679 2009
4.6
C
1754 COMMON LUCK
IMO 9617741
58,756 2012
4.6
C
1755 UNITY N
IMO 9490466
79,642 2011
4.6
C
1756 POCHARD
IMO 9960162
37,991 2023
4.6
C
1757 TAXIDIARA
IMO 9331919
56,049 2007
4.6
C
1758 HEROIC STRIKER
IMO 9493676
56,820 2010
4.6
C
1759 AMIS LEADER
IMO 9520819
58,107 2010
4.6
C
1760 KONYA
IMO 9657789
63,200 2013
4.6
C
1761 MAHA YAYA
IMO 9525613
84,108 2013
4.6
C
1762 VALENCIA EAGLE
IMO 9699311
63,556 2015
4.6
C
1763 FEDERAL PASSION
IMO 9926049
42,692 2022
4.6
C
1764 MAMA STRENGTH
IMO 9673525
75,610 2014
4.6
C
1765 TWIN DELIGHT
IMO 9984481
40,656 2024
4.6
C
1766 STAR GENESIS
IMO 9457464
80,671 2010
4.6
C
1767 LAKER
IMO 9581368
57,399 2011
4.6
C
1768 LUMINA
IMO 9690509
55,865 2015
4.6
C
1769 KMAX VISION
IMO 9436654
91,913 2009
4.6
C
1770 XO COPENHAGEN
IMO 9520780
58,107 2010
4.6
C
1771 CETUS OMURA
IMO 9670781
43,532 2016
4.6
C
1772 EPIC TRADER
IMO 9551698
56,778 2012
4.6
C
1773 LYRIC POET
IMO 9590577
81,276 2012
4.6
C
1774 AVON TRADER
IMO 9566849
79,452 2012
4.6
C
1775 SAMSUN
IMO 9657777
63,200 2013
4.6
C
1776 LILA SEOUL
IMO 9566837
79,454 2012
4.6
C
1777 TRAPEZITZA
IMO 9968499
45,189 2024
4.6
C
1778 SPAR RIGEL
IMO 9557111
58,000 2010
4.6
C
1779 NING TAI HAI
IMO 9751341
63,474 2017
4.6
C
1780 LAGONDA
IMO 9456549
55,733 2011
4.6
C
1781 KN FUTURE
IMO 9558270
57,999 2013
4.6
C
1782 DAMON
IMO 9575187
63,301 2012
4.6
C
1783 ERNEST VINBERG
IMO 9707649
63,411 2015
4.6
C
1784 GENCO HUNTER
IMO 9368871
57,982 2007
4.6
C
1785 BRIGHT
IMO 9240794
50,363 2002
4.6
C
1786 OBE GRANDE
IMO 9615731
58,613 2012
4.6
C
1787 THOR CONFIDENCE
IMO 9403023
58,781 2008
4.6
C
1788 FEDERAL INDIANA
IMO 9975387
34,763 2024
4.6
C
1789 CRIMSON QUEEN
IMO 9465174
58,140 2014
4.6
C
1790 ANGELINA THE GREAT N
IMO 9593725
55,768 2012
4.6
C
1791 THE GIVER
IMO 9310537
75,726 2006
4.6
C
1792 K.RUBY
IMO 9514042
55,688 2011
4.6
C
1793 JOSCO RUNZHOU
IMO 9459644
58,722 2011
4.6
C
1794 AEOLOS
IMO 9670901
63,434 2015
4.6
C
1795 ELIM BOUNCE
IMO 9515096
61,616 2012
4.6
C
1796 ALEXIS
IMO 9609158
81,623 2012
4.6
C
1797 AYTEN CEBI
IMO 9802243
63,913 2018
4.6
C
1798 SSI DAUNTLESS
IMO 9637428
57,200 2013
4.6
C
1799 ELIM COURAGE
IMO 9425760
58,163 2009
4.6
C
1800 FEDERAL TIBER
IMO 9644483
55,160 2013
4.6
C
Page 36 of 71 — 3,531 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.