Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Bulk Carrier Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#1,052 of 3,436 bulk carriers
CO₂ intensity
3.8 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (4.7)
-20% greener
B

CII band distribution

1,301 at D/E
A 1,145B 954C 1,317D 767E 534

4,717 rated vessels · 519 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

124
Q4
136
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
107
'27 Q4
103
'28 Q1
90
'28 Q2
82
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 4,883 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 4,833 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 3,664 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k — vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 3,455 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 2,973 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

1,119
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€4,917–11,737M
capex range, top measure per vessel (1,119 of 1,119 with computable scaling)
0.25–0.47 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
STAITHES · 25-60k E 12y 2026
LANNA NAREE · 25-60k E 14y 2026
MAGNOLIA · 25-60k E 15y 2026
ASIAN PRIDE · 60-100k E 9y 2026
PERSEUS · 60-100k E 11y 2026
See all 4,717 rated bulk carriers with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
3,507
vessels ranked
1.74
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
4.46
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
1043 MIM VANGELIS JR
IMO 9302786
76,619 2005
3.8
B
1057 ARTVIN
IMO 9595034
81,827 2011
3.8
B
1052 FLAG EVI
IMO 9619799
82,629 2014
3.8
B
1056 YUAN HANG CAI FU
IMO 9580481
76,037 2012
3.8
B
1058 LUVIA
IMO 9316220
55,317 2004
3.8
B
1055 CUI PING FENG
IMO 9523172
75,486 2011
3.8
B
1065 MINOAN FALCON
IMO 9605841
92,700 2011
3.8
B
1064 LV STAR
IMO 9553218
79,252 2012
3.8
B
1054 NS NINGBO
IMO 9954979
64,129 2021
3.8
B
1063 BELFUJI
IMO 9860661
63,468 2020
3.8
B
1062 NOVA CAELI
IMO 9836414
81,612 2019
3.8
B
1061 CORONA
IMO 9391971
83,688 2009
3.8
B
1060 VELSHEDA
IMO 9494008
82,172 2012
3.8
B
1059 DSI ALTAIR
IMO 9749245
60,309 2016
3.8
B
1053 PIAVIA
IMO 9570864
93,296 2011
3.8
B
1066 SEABISCUIT
IMO 9619787
82,624 2014
3.8
B
1071 NORDIC ORION
IMO 9529463
75,603 2011
3.8
B
1070 MARIETTA C
IMO 9281437
73,641 2002
3.8
B
1072 PROPEL WEALTH
IMO 9736353
80,868 2015
3.8
B
1069 ULTRA COURAGE
IMO 9856256
63,646 2019
3.8
B
1080 DESPINA V
IMO 9727986
81,200 2018
3.8
B
1073 YUN MI FENG
IMO 9523196
75,421 2011
3.8
B
1068 DEE4 OAK
IMO 9790854
63,490 2017
3.8
B
1079 MYKONOS WAVE
IMO 9453406
87,340 2012
3.8
B
1078 HUA XING HAI
IMO 9758583
81,108 2017
3.8
B
1077 ALMA
IMO 9706530
81,947 2017
3.8
B
1076 GOLDEN FREEZE
IMO 9849904
81,135 2021
3.8
B
1075 S SAMBA
IMO 9712486
84,867 2013
3.8
B
1074 SANTA ACE
IMO 9951977
63,725 2022
3.8
B
1067 MEHMET AKSOY
IMO 9607502
81,490 2012
3.8
B
1081 TAI STRIDE
IMO 9926001
64,539 2022
3.8
B
1084 HARRIER S
IMO 1082809
40,563 2025
3.8
B
1088 JAG AARATI
IMO 9478200
80,323 2011
3.8
B
1085 BULK ATACAMA
IMO 9683130
61,384 2008
3.8
B
1083 ATMOSPHERE
IMO 9527283
76,606 2009
3.8
B
1094 FE MAGICIAN
IMO 9660633
70,776 2011
3.8
B
1092 KAVO ALKYON
IMO 9291121
75,300 2005
3.8
B
1093 EQUINOX DAWN II
IMO 9725457
60,456 2015
3.8
B
1091 SEAJOY II
IMO 9870874
61,331 2019
3.8
B
1090 MARVELOUS STAR
IMO 9864095
81,980 2020
3.8
B
1082 DARYA SATI
IMO 9752424
64,000 2014
3.8
B
1089 GISELA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9702601
80,839 2015
3.8
B
1087 CL CHENZHOU
IMO 9953339
64,741 2023
3.8
B
1086 WADI ALKARNAK
IMO 9127136
70,090 1997
3.8
B
1097 KYPROS SPIRIT
IMO 9717436
77,998 2016
3.8
B
1096 JOANNA
IMO 9473183
76,000 2010
3.8
B
1095 CHILOE ISLAND
IMO 9610755
58,044 2010
3.8
B
1100 XIN HAI TONG 23
IMO 9453236
56,708 2010
3.8
B
1099 KOBAYASHI MARU
IMO 9847011
60,397 2019
3.8
B
1098 YILDIZLAR 3
IMO 9370795
49,507 2008
3.8
B
Page 22 of 69 — 3,436 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.