Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

General Cargo Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2025. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2025)
#333 of 2,380 general cargos
CO₂ intensity
6.4 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (13.95)
-54% greener
A

CII band distribution

516 at D/E
A 1,027B 685C 507D 261E 255

2,735 rated vessels · 242 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

43
Q3
45
Q4
41
'27 Q1
38
'27 Q2
35
'27 Q3
33
'27 Q4
29
'28 Q1
33
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,466 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Rotor sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,500k–3,500k vendor claim
Suction wing sails (per unit) 631 route-dependent €1,000k–2,500k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 572 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Turbocharger cut-out 530 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 101 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

245
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€95–286M
capex range, top measure per vessel (245 of 245 with computable scaling)
0.06–0.11 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
PACIFIC INTEGRITY · <25k E 15y 2026
CLAUDIO CUCCO · <25k E 40y 2026
GINO CUCCO · <25k E 39y 2026
GIUSEPPE CUCCO · <25k E 49y 2026
LADY OF CHICHESTER · <25k E 56y 2026
See all 2,735 rated general cargos with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →
2,429
vessels ranked
3.13
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
14.48
segment median
# Vessel Size (DWT) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
301 V TAURUS
IMO 9496161
33,193 2010
6.2
A
302 LADY SERRA
IMO 9449883
30,124 2011
6.2
A
303 IRON LADY
IMO 9385099
32,283 2009
6.2
A
305 SAGA VIKING
IMO 9233466
46,901 2002
6.2
A
304 REESTBORG
IMO 9592563
23,296 2013
6.2
A
306 21 HONOR
IMO 9495363
37,155 2012
6.2
A
307 BERGE ANNUPURI
IMO 9713193
34,536 2016
6.2
A
308 UBC SALAVERRY
IMO 9426881
33,305 2010
6.2
A
310 ACACIA
IMO 9597642
33,677 2011
6.2
A
309 SWORD LION
IMO 9136785
27,919 1996
6.2
A
311 FU HAI
IMO 9766657
31,777 2016
6.3
A
312 PATRIA
IMO 9580053
32,069 2014
6.3
A
314 MELOI
IMO 9392119
33,355 2009
6.3
A
313 ATHENA SAN
IMO 9623659
38,503 2011
6.3
A
315 SEA FAITH
IMO 9655420
33,343 2014
6.3
A
317 ECO MONEGASQUE
IMO 9701011
33,190 2015
6.3
A
316 V LYRA
IMO 9539444
33,628 2012
6.3
A
318 ZIMRIDA
IMO 9380817
37,296 2008
6.3
A
319 TIAN XI
IMO 9704764
38,098 2016
6.3
A
322 NORDIC MALMOE
IMO 9602679
35,038 2012
6.4
A
321 TIAN LE
IMO 9722730
37,993 2016
6.4
A
320 ARIANDA
IMO 9537276
37,495 2010
6.4
A
324 AMELIE
IMO 9647289
34,650 2013
6.4
A
323 COOL BREEZE
IMO 9400930
32,283 2010
6.4
A
325 LADY ZEHRA
IMO 9309617
31,734 2006
6.4
A
326 SATURN J
IMO 9546174
33,477 2010
6.4
A
327 ECO NEMESIS
IMO 9711913
33,375 2015
6.4
A
328 TAN BINH 299
IMO 9459149
33,132 2011
6.4
A
329 UBC TAMPA
IMO 9416707
37,724 2009
6.4
A
332 SSI MERAL HANIM
IMO 9491678
37,238 2011
6.4
A
331 SHAMAN WISDOM
IMO 9563407
35,052 2010
6.4
A
330 GRAIN WAY
IMO 9545560
23,000 2009
6.4
A
333 K BEREKET
IMO 9370408
33,225 2008
6.5
A
334 CORINTHIAN SPIRE
IMO 9478482
32,155 2009
6.5
A
335 KAMENARI
IMO 9400942
32,326 2010
6.5
A
336 BC LARA
IMO 9598024
38,494 2011
6.5
A
338 ERNA OLDENDORFF
IMO 9717670
38,330 2016
6.5
A
337 EKATERINA
IMO 9641807
38,182 2013
6.5
A
339 V CETUS
IMO 9370381
33,401 2008
6.5
A
340 IWAMI
IMO 9414981
20,142 2009
6.5
A
341 PLUTO
IMO 9432531
32,092 2014
6.5
A
344 NORDIC OSLO
IMO 9626601
35,866 2012
6.5
A
345 FIRST BROTHER
IMO 9266140
32,385 2003
6.5
A
343 AMIRA MARYANA
IMO 9379650
32,029 2007
6.5
A
342 KERASIA S
IMO 9496185
33,170 2011
6.5
A
349 SIROCO
IMO 9317705
37,534 2006
6.6
A
348 NANAMI FORTUNE
IMO 9712656
33,421 2014
6.6
A
347 NOVI
IMO 9424120
34,044 2011
6.6
A
346 GLOBAL ARSENAL
IMO 9363302
32,313 2008
6.6
A
350 SUNSET
IMO 9402122
37,334 2009
6.6
A
Page 7 of 48 — 2,380 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2025 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.