Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#2,014 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
23.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+130% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,079 at D/E
A 312B 412C 707D 598E 481

2,510 rated vessels · 551 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q4
101
'27 Q1
72
'27 Q2
77
'27 Q3
95
'27 Q4
118
'28 Q1
105
'28 Q2
94
'28 Q3

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,640 1–3% €80k–250k — vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,427 5–10% €400k–1,200k — vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,330 2–6% €300k–900k — vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 933 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k — vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 763 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k — vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 348 3–6% €500–1,500/kW — vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

623
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,176–7,513M
capex range, top measure per vessel (623 of 623 with computable scaling)
1.44–2.55 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
MSC ANNAMARIA · <25k E 1y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
C LION · 100-200k E 21y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.41
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2001 VERONICA B
IMO 9436305
812 TEU 2011
25.1
E
2002 STEEN
IMO 9360996
905 TEU 2008
25.1
E
2003 MSC MANON
IMO 9435820
312 TEU 2008
25.2
E
2004 MSC AMIHAN F
IMO 9449687
957 TEU 2008
25.2
E
2005 MACARENA B
IMO 9277400
822 TEU 2003
25.3
E
2006 LOUISE BORCHARD
IMO 9336294
228 TEU 2006
25.3
E
2007 ILHA DA MADEIRA
IMO 9202077
712 TEU 1999
25.3
E
2008 X-PRESS ELBE
IMO 9483669
1,036 TEU 2010
25.5
E
2009 EMILIA
IMO 9197521
700 TEU 2010
25.6
E
2010 MSC LENA F
IMO 9347762
916 TEU 2006
25.7
E
2011 SKY LIGHT
IMO 9118513
1,042 TEU 1996
25.7
E
2012 ENCOUNTER
IMO 9255775
750 TEU 2004
25.7
E
2013 SVEN-D
IMO 9302243
809 TEU 2005
25.7
E
2014 K-RIVER
IMO 9138355
700 TEU 1997
25.7
E
2015 ELBE
IMO 9244180
1,100 TEU 2001
25.8
E
2016 STAR COMET
IMO 9242596
735 TEU 2002
25.8
E
2017 ENFORCER
IMO 9255737
750 TEU 2003
25.9
E
2018 WEGA
IMO 9141118
749 TEU 1996
25.9
E
2019 MAX
IMO 9351098
712 TEU 2006
26.0
E
2020 MEDKON LUNA
IMO 9341976
698 TEU 2007
26.0
E
2021 SALGUEIRO
IMO 9301562
1,118 TEU 2005
26.0
E
2022 CONTSHIP IVY
IMO 9371402
925 TEU 2007
26.1
E
2023 ENERGY
IMO 9255787
750 TEU 2004
26.1
E
2024 NJORD
IMO 9349227
809 TEU 2007
26.1
E
2025 FENJA
IMO 9287716
822 TEU 2003
26.1
E
2026 X-PRESS MULHACEN
IMO 9365960
767 TEU 2008
26.2
E
2027 HANNI
IMO 9188506
658 TEU 1999
26.3
E
2028 ALOPO
IMO 9329564
698 TEU 2004
26.3
E
2029 SCARLETTA
IMO 9449699
957 TEU 2008
26.3
E
2030 CONTSHIP SKY
IMO 9403449
1,118 TEU 2008
26.4
E
2031 PANTONIO
IMO 9440576
698 TEU 2007
26.4
E
2032 REBECCA S
IMO 9428205
698 TEU 2007
26.4
E
2033 PACIFIC DALIAN
IMO 9339090
700 TEU 2008
26.4
E
2034 CONTSHIP VIE
IMO 9434802
1,114 TEU 2007
26.4
E
Page 41 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.