Maritime Intelligence Network
One Account. Three Powerful Platforms.
TrustedDocks ACTIVE New-Ships PortTracker

Container Ship Emissions & Retrofit Radar

Ships ranked by AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) — grams of CO₂ emitted per tonne of deadweight carried one nautical mile (g CO₂/dwt·nm), the IMO carbon-intensity metric behind the CII rating — from official EU MRV emissions data for reporting year 2024. Lower is greener. Pick a segment and size class to see the greenest vessels first.

Segment rank (2024)
#2,014 of 2,098 container ships
CO₂ intensity
23.9 g CO₂/dwt·nm
vs segment average (10.38)
+130% higher
E

CII band distribution

1,081 at D/E
A 310B 415C 704D 602E 479

2,510 rated vessels · 463 of the D/E set dock within 12 months

Docking pipeline — D/E vessels per quarter

96
Q3
99
Q4
87
'27 Q1
77
'27 Q2
58
'27 Q3
73
'27 Q4
112
'28 Q1
77
'28 Q2

Windows estimated from the class-expiry docking model, not bookings.

Top eligible retrofit measures for this segment

MeasureEligible CO₂ reductionCapex band PaybackConfidence
Turbocharger cut-out 1,485 1–3% €80k–250k vendor claim
Propeller redesign / replacement 1,440 5–10% €400k–1,200k vendor claim
Bulbous bow reprofiling 1,344 2–6% €300k–900k vendor claim
Methanol dual-fuel conversion 965 5–15% €8,000k–20,000k vendor claim
LNG dual-fuel conversion 795 15–25% €15,000k–35,000k vendor claim
Shaft generator / PTO 360 3–6% €500–1,500/kW vendor claim

Capex bands are indicative vendor/literature priors. Payback appears once price parameters are configured.

Retrofit opportunity in this segment

624
D/E vessels with at least one eligible measure
€3,295–7,790M
capex range, top measure per vessel (624 of 624 with computable scaling)
1.48–2.63 Mt
annual CO₂ reduction available (vendor-claimed ranges × reported emissions)

Retrofit prospects — worst band first

VesselBand Age Drop year
HANSA AFRICA · 25-60k E 16y 2026
SEPELU · <25k E 26y 2026
MSC SABRINA III · <25k E 37y 2026
NILEDUTCH LION · 100-200k E 18y 2026
HAMBURG TRADER · <25k E 21y 2026
See all 2,510 rated container ships with exposure and dock windows. Sign in →

Note: Container/ro-ro cargo ship vessels are excluded from this ranking — their CII type is a per-vessel flag-state determination, so no valid comparison metric exists for them.

2,076
vessels ranked
2.25
greenest (g CO₂/dwt·nm)
8.4
segment median
# Vessel Size (TEU) Built Carbon intensity — AER (g CO₂/dwt·nm) Grade
2001 PAFILIA
IMO 9322853
712 TEU 2006
25.1
E
2002 VERONICA B
IMO 9436305
803 TEU 2011
25.1
E
2003 MACARENA B
IMO 9277400
864 TEU 2003
25.3
E
2004 LOUISE BORCHARD
IMO 9336294
660 TEU 2006
25.3
E
2005 ILHA DA MADEIRA
IMO 9202077
712 TEU 1999
25.3
E
2006 X-PRESS ELBE
IMO 9483669
1,036 TEU 2010
25.5
E
2007 EMILIA
IMO 9197521
700 TEU 2010
25.6
E
2008 MSC LENA F
IMO 9347762
916 TEU 2006
25.7
E
2009 ENCOUNTER
IMO 9255775
750 TEU 2004
25.7
E
2010 SKY LIGHT
IMO 9118513
1,042 TEU 1996
25.7
E
2011 SVEN-D
IMO 9302243
809 TEU 2005
25.7
E
2012 ELBE
IMO 9244180
660 TEU 2001
25.7
E
2013 ENERGY
IMO 9255787
750 TEU 2004
25.7
E
2014 K-RIVER
IMO 9138355
700 TEU 1997
25.7
E
2015 STAR COMET
IMO 9242596
735 TEU 2002
25.8
E
2016 ENFORCER
IMO 9255737
750 TEU 2003
25.9
E
2017 WEGA
IMO 9141118
749 TEU 1996
25.9
E
2018 MAX
IMO 9351098
724 TEU 2006
26.0
E
2019 MEDKON LUNA
IMO 9341976
698 TEU 2007
26.0
E
2020 SALGUEIRO
IMO 9301562
1,100 TEU 2005
26.0
E
2021 CONTSHIP IVY
IMO 9371402
925 TEU 2007
26.1
E
2022 FENJA
IMO 9287716
864 TEU 2003
26.1
E
2023 X-PRESS MULHACEN
IMO 9365960
767 TEU 2008
26.2
E
2024 HANNI
IMO 9188506
658 TEU 1998
26.3
E
2025 ALOPO
IMO 9329564
698 TEU 2004
26.3
E
2026 NJORD
IMO 9349227
809 TEU 2007
26.3
E
2027 SCARLETTA
IMO 9449699
916 TEU 2008
26.3
E
2028 CONTSHIP SKY
IMO 9403449
1,118 TEU 2008
26.4
E
2029 PANTONIO
IMO 9440576
698 TEU 2007
26.4
E
2030 REBECCA S
IMO 9428205
698 TEU 2007
26.4
E
2031 PACIFIC DALIAN
IMO 9339090
698 TEU 2008
26.4
E
2032 CONTSHIP VIE
IMO 9434802
1,100 TEU 2007
26.4
E
2033 HELENE
IMO 9362956
916 TEU 2007
26.6
E
2034 SKOGAFOSS
IMO 9375252
698 TEU 2007
26.6
E
Page 41 of 41 — 2,034 vessels
Engine intelligence

Which engines power the greenest fleets?

The main engine is the single largest CO₂ source on board — typically well over 80% of a ship's emissions come from propulsion. We aggregated this ranking the other way around: every engine design is scored by the measured carbon intensity of the vessels carrying it, licensee-built units merged under their design brand. The verdict from the 2024 data — modern dual-fuel designs like MAN B&W's ME-GI and WinGD's X-DF families, together with EGR/SCR-abated and ultra-long-stroke G-type engines, consistently power the most emission-friendly ships in service.

Emission-friendly engine ranking

AER (Annual Efficiency Ratio) = annual CO₂ emissions ÷ (deadweight × distance sailed), the IMO carbon-intensity metric used for CII ratings. It is built only from measured CO₂, distance and deadweight — not the self-reported cargo transport-work figure, which is unreliable. Implausible outliers (top 2% per segment) are excluded. Grade A–E reflects each vessel's rank within its segment. Source: EMSA THETIS-MRV.